Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-09-2016

(10-09-2016, 12:58 AM)Barba Wrote: Shannon, what are you working on at the moment (besides DMSI) and if/when next verions of AM, SM, WM can be expected?

Thanks.

I am working on overcoming the oddly high level of exhaustion I feel all the time lately... trying to work on 6G prototype, DMSI, MIR2... not getting very far very fast. I wake up feeling like I need to go to sleep lately. I think this may be the aftermath of the chickenpox, but I don't know why that would be.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-09-2016

(10-09-2016, 01:24 AM)ffaux Wrote: Does anything in AM deal directly with giving myself unconditional approval and letting go of disapproval of myself and others?

If memory serves, it deals directly with giving self unconditional approval and letting go of self disapproval, but does nothing about disapproval of others.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-09-2016

(10-09-2016, 07:07 AM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: When you say you're not going to add additional energy sources do you mean you're not going to seek out any additional energy sources that we haven't previously tried? Or that re-enabling the energy sources that were in versions 2.2 and 2.3 are difficult?

I mean I am going to leave the script alone except to disable the clearing aspects. It's not a matter of re-enabling old sources, it's a matter of re-working the entire script to include and handle them. Energy sourcing is a very deeply rooted and complex part of the script. Each such change requires a LOT of modeling and script work. So between that and the information loss by changing it... I am not going to change it in 2.4/2.5


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bookstacks DC737 - 10-09-2016

(10-09-2016, 11:14 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-09-2016, 07:07 AM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: When you say you're not going to add additional energy sources do you mean you're not going to seek out any additional energy sources that we haven't previously tried? Or that re-enabling the energy sources that were in versions 2.2 and 2.3 are difficult?

I mean I am going to leave the script alone except to disable the clearing aspects. It's not a matter of re-enabling old sources, it's a matter of re-working the entire script to include and handle them. Energy sourcing is a very deeply rooted and complex part of the script. Each such change requires a LOT of modeling and script work. So between that and the information loss by changing it... I am not going to change it in 2.4/2.5

Ah okay, gotcha. I was under the assumption that the energy sourcing was just an on/off thing like the clearing.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Duke.Togo - 10-09-2016

Shannon, quick question for you. How much of a difference would 2.3 and a possible 2.5 have if you were to disable the healing scripts from 2.4?

Also, if you were to release a 2.5, when would you be considering it for release?

I've had the plan to stay on DMSI 2.4 for up to 45 days, so I have 10 days left before I re-evaluate whether I stay on it or go back to 2.3. I was just curious about the differences because if you are going to release a 2.5, and the scripting would be fairly different than 2.3, than I will probably move to that rather than go back to 2.3 after my 45 day run.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 10-09-2016

What's the point of no healing modules, again? Didn't we already do that for the "I told you so" no-healing-module-version V2.3?

If people aren't getting the results in V2.4, V2.5 with no healing as the only difference, isn't likely to change that. If V2.5 only has no healing as the sole difference, I don't see the benefit in switching to it. Seems like a waste of time when I may be at least able to get some healing benefits continuing on V2.4 to make the next version work properly. I'm not getting the program goal on V2.4 with healing, so I doubt without healing I'll fare any better.

There are like two people here who are anti-healing, one of whom has left the forum it seems, sadly. But, it doesn't seem reasonable or beneficial to shortchange everyone else here just to make a second "I told you so" version. Especially when V2.3 already exists for them to use if they're so dead set on no healing, so tell them to put their money where their mouth is and use it. It's strange to see such resistance to healing modules, especially since they are short circuiting in nature when not needed, so they literally aren't impeding you in any way. This could all just be them trying to resist dealing with whatever they have buried underneath, though.

Let's not waste yet another month or more on a *second* "I told you so" version of the program, just to bare out what almost all of us already know.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Duke.Togo - 10-09-2016

(10-09-2016, 11:45 AM)CatMan Wrote: What's the point of no healing modules, again? Didn't we already do that for the "I told you so" no-healing-module-version V2.3?

If people aren't getting the results in V2.4, V2.5 with no healing as the only difference, isn't likely to change that. If V2.5 only has no healing as the sole difference, I don't see the benefit in switching to it. Seems like a waste of time when I may be at least able to get some healing benefits continuing on V2.4 to make the next version work properly. I'm not getting the program goal on V2.4 with healing, so I doubt without healing I'll fare any better.

There are like two people here who are anti-healing, one of whom has left the forum it seems, sadly. But, it doesn't seem reasonable or beneficial to shortchange everyone else here just to make a second "I told you so" version. Especially when V2.3 already exists for them to use if they're so dead set on no healing, so tell them to put their money where their mouth is and use it. It's strange to see such resistance to healing modules, especially since they are short circuiting in nature when not needed, so they literally aren't impeding you in any way. This could all just be them trying to resist dealing with whatever they have buried underneath, though.

Let's not waste yet another month or more on a *second* "I told you so" version of the program, just to bare out what almost all of us already know.

I would like to know from Shannon what the differences in the script would be. I also don't agree with the fact that if people don't have the results with 2.4's current script that a version 2.5 without the clearing modules would be the same..

The way I understood v2.4 to work is that the clearing modules will be in effect until any blockages are removed. After that, the other areas of the script would take into effect.

Being that I started with 2.3 and was only 12 days into it before 2.4 was released, I would like to understand the key differences. If there aren't going to be very many key differences between a v2.3 and a v2.5, I agree, it's not worth loading up. If the differences are enough between the two programs, I'd be interested in trying it out.

And even if a v2.5 is released, it doesn't mean that everyone has to switch to it.

I would like to hear what Shannon has to say, as he knows more about this than all of us here. I'll go with whatever he advises.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 10-09-2016

Why do we even need V2.5 ?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 10-09-2016

(10-09-2016, 11:57 AM)Duke.Togo Wrote: I would like to know from Shannon what the differences in the script would be.

Just take a look to the product description at the product page. There are all changes hid did between 2.3 and 2.4. And the only difference between 2.4 and 2.5 would be the removed healing as he said at the last page.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 10-09-2016

Shannon was the one that resurrected 2.5 talk. He said he's thinking about building it due to the extended time between v2.4 and the 3-series. Could use the observations between healing in v2.4 and no healing in v2.5.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Duke.Togo - 10-09-2016

(10-09-2016, 12:03 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(10-09-2016, 11:57 AM)Duke.Togo Wrote: I would like to know from Shannon what the differences in the script would be.

Just take a look to the product description at the product page. There are all changes hid did between 2.3 and 2.4. And the only difference between 2.4 and 2.5 would be the removed healing as he said at the last page.

No, I understand that portion, but he also upgraded some of the technologies as well in 2.4 that 2.3 didn't have. My question is the overall changes in the program versions between 2.3 and 2.4, if the clearing modules are removed, how much of an overall difference would that make between a v2.3 and a v2.5.

I took on the DMSI test to be part of its "clinical trials". If the changes are significant enough between versions, it would be interesting to see what the differences are. I'm only raising these points because they were brought up yesterday and Shannon himself said he was considering it. I'm merely following up on the conversation.

We're not guaranteed that V3 will take us to the promised land either. Maybe closer, but, that's the whole point of developing an experimental technology isn't it? To test and continue to refine.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Weichi - 10-09-2016

(10-09-2016, 11:45 AM)CatMan Wrote: It's strange to see such resistance to healing modules, especially since they are short circuiting in nature when not needed, so they literally aren't impeding you in any way. This could all just be them trying to resist dealing with whatever they have buried underneath, though.

Unless those modules don't short circuiting and Shannon want to check that.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 10-09-2016

(10-09-2016, 12:15 PM)Duke.Togo Wrote: My question is the overall changes in the program versions between 2.3 and 2.4

From product page:
Quote:V2.4 Adjustments/additions:

Many tweaks in many different areas of the script and modules.
Added and optimized SEBAM tech module.
Added and optimized MAFE tech module.
Addedand optimized RIFX tech module.
Added added and optimized MIIX tech module.
Tripled the number of statements in the SATT module.
Enabled SVX and focused it on achieving the goals ofthe program.
Optimized ATMX module.
Enabled the OGSF module and all related sub-modules, and focused them on achieving the goals of the program.
Added the surprise.
Heavily modified and optimized the goal phrasing.

That's the technology and also why I mentioned the product page.

EDIT: The surprise is P3


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 10-09-2016

(10-09-2016, 12:16 PM)Weichi Wrote:
(10-09-2016, 11:45 AM)CatMan Wrote: It's strange to see such resistance to healing modules, especially since they are short circuiting in nature when not needed, so they literally aren't impeding you in any way. This could all just be them trying to resist dealing with whatever they have buried underneath, though.

Unless those modules don't short circuiting and Shannon want to check that.

Then V2.3 would've been a step forward in results, but it wasn't. So it seems the test was already done and feedback showed they weren't in the way. And the reason V2.2 failed was because of a discovered script error, not the healing modules. They were red herrings. So I just feel this test would be redundant, and am hesitant to go off the healing benefits of V2.4 due to that is all.