+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 10-08-2016
(10-08-2016, 08:44 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have been thinking that given the extended time frame on building 3.0, I probably will build 2.5.
An additional energy source would be great in 2.5.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-09-2016
(10-08-2016, 09:00 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Two questions, Shannon.
1. Is there any kind of estimate of a DMSRI (Sexual and Romantic) release/testing phase in the forseeable future? I'd totally get this version if it was available within in the next 6 months, otherwise I'll just jump on DMSI.
DMSRI is not currently a definite for creation.
Quote:2. Will 2.5 just be 2.4 without healing or will it have some additions? And when do you plan on releasing it? Since I'm going to be on DMSI soon, I definitely want to purchase a version with healing.
Gracias, Shannon!
2.5 will be 2.4 without the clearing scripting activated. As to additions... the more of those I make, the longer it takes to create. Adding anything new means 3.0 takes longer to build. So there will probably not be any additions. I have not yet finalized my idea to build it, but it will be soon if I do.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-09-2016
(10-08-2016, 09:59 PM)sawell54 Wrote: The clearing in 2.4 is working I am responding much differently to rejections and I am feeling more motivated to approach pretty women. I was rejected last week, a pretty girl blatantly ignored me when she was in line ordering food in front of people and walked off and it did not faze me I felt some anxiety going up but after it happened I actually felt a rush to do it again. That tells me the clearing is doing something. In the past that rejection would have shut me down for a couple days mentally.
With that said I still feel V1 was the most powerful for the aura but the clearing and balance in 2.4 Is what i am most looking for
We will get there.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-09-2016
(10-08-2016, 10:29 PM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: Anyway another thing that I really curious until now.
A wonder where did Shannon put his actual photo himself in this forum. Shannon just well said it that he already.
I don't remember. Someone will probably link you, though.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-09-2016
(10-08-2016, 11:55 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:(10-08-2016, 08:44 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have been thinking that given the extended time frame on building 3.0, I probably will build 2.5.
An additional energy source would be great in 2.5.
It would also slow down development of 2.5 and 3.0, and deprive me of my ability to see the difference between with and without healing... probably not going to happen, even though I would like to.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AriGold - 10-09-2016
Is seek the challenge part of DMSI or will it be in future versions?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dr. Strangelove - 10-09-2016
Shannon, what are you working on at the moment (besides DMSI) and if/when next verions of AM, SM, WM can be expected?
Thanks.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ffaux - 10-09-2016
Does anything in AM deal directly with giving myself unconditional approval and letting go of disapproval of myself and others?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bookstacks DC737 - 10-09-2016
When you say you're not going to add additional energy sources do you mean you're not going to seek out any additional energy sources that we haven't previously tried? Or that re-enabling the energy sources that were in versions 2.2 and 2.3 are difficult?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 10-09-2016
(10-08-2016, 10:29 PM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: Anyway another thing that I really curious until now.
A wonder where did Shannon put his actual photo himself in this forum. Shannon just well said it that he already.
There is a link in this thread (somewhere around page 65), but for some reason it doesn't work anymore.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 10-09-2016
(10-09-2016, 07:07 AM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: When you say you're not going to add additional energy sources do you mean you're not going to seek out any additional energy sources that we haven't previously tried? Or that re-enabling the energy sources that were in versions 2.2 and 2.3 are difficult?
They simply aren't going into 2.5 for reasons he mentioned above but into V3.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bookstacks DC737 - 10-09-2016
Aw bummer
I feel that not having all the necessary energy is causing the slower results, and I certainly can't see a subliminal with this big of an energy requirement able to source it all from food alone.
The results of a 2.5 test would be interesting but I know that for me personally I have a ways to go with the healing and would prefer to continue healing because it's caused such a large shift in every other area of my life. I just can't shake the feeling that energy sourcing would increase the effects of the aura and help us reach our goal much faster.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 10-09-2016
I would also like the extra energy source. But, hey, if it will slow down 3.0 development significantly than it is ok. And either way, I need the healing, too, before I really get results.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-09-2016
(10-09-2016, 12:56 AM)AriGold Wrote: Is seek the challenge part of DMSI or will it be in future versions?
No. It is not part of DMSI because it presumes the goal is that the user is seeking the affected, when in fact the goal is that the affected seek out the user. It would therefore seem to have little value in such a program.