Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016

P5 is a technology I have been using for a long time in the 6G prototype, which is particularly brilliant, but which is so far back in the development cycle that I didn't even realize it was one of the "P" series of technologies. Technically, it's P1 or maybe P2, but it gets designated P5 because I just realized what it does to the effects of P4 and P3.

What does it do?

P3 takes WPS to the maximum possible. P4 scales it back to whatever is your optimal WPS at that moment. P5 then makes this value higher and more powerful and effective than P3 or P4, while maintaining the optimal effectiveness that P4 introduced for P3.

It's very hard to explain without giving away what is being done to achieve this goal, and I would understand if you either think it makes no sense, or if you don't believe it. When I first had the idea for P5, it excited the hell out of me and made me laugh because it seemed so preposterous that I didn't think it would work...

But it does.

P4 will be in DMSI 3.0.1. P5? Maybe, depending on whether or not it is disruptive to anything else. P5 will be in MIR2, though.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016

(10-04-2016, 12:35 PM)Travis Wrote: I'm glad to hear Overcome Approach Anxiety will be adde to DMSI v2.4. I had bought it and used it a couple times before realizing how stupid it was to do both.

As others have said, the attraction is clearly there but some people need the extra emphasis on AA.

Some people also need a reminder that the goal of the program is to get them to approach you. Wink

OAA will therefore be integrated in DMSI such that it affects both the user and the affected.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Blacksheep - 10-04-2016

I'm so very happy that Overcome Approach Anxiety will be added to v2.4. I bought OAA and used it for two days before realizing how stupid it is to mess with the programming. Frustrating to see obvious

Shannon says AM6 and DMSI will produce the same results if you keep your nose to the grindstone (At least in terms of women). Very interesting to me.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016

(10-04-2016, 12:53 PM)Travis Wrote: I'm so very happy that Overcome Approach Anxiety will be added to v2.4. I bought OAA and used it for two days before realizing how stupid it is to mess with the programming. Frustrating to see obvious

Shannon says AM6 and DMSI will produce the same results if you keep your nose to the grindstone (At least in terms of women). Very interesting to me.

I do?

They're very different programs, and they have very different goals. The results with women will not be the same. Generally, women will be much less likely to act on their attraction without you initiating, from AM6. They'll be attracted and they'll want you, if you've achieved alpha male. But they'll also expect you to do the footwork most of the time. What the goal of DMSI is, is to take anyone - alpha or not - and make them their best most sexually irresistible self, and then make that so intense that others actually initiate and then have physical sex with you as much as you allow.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Blacksheep - 10-04-2016

(10-04-2016, 01:12 PM)Shannon Wrote: I do?

They're very different programs, and they have very different goals. The results with women will not be the same. Generally, women will be much less likely to act on their attraction without you initiating, from AM6. They'll be attracted and they'll want you, if you've achieved alpha male. But they'll also expect you to do the footwork most of the time. What the goal of DMSI is, is to take anyone - alpha or not - and make them their best most sexually irresistible self, and then make that so intense that others actually initiate and then have physical sex with you as much as you allow.

My fault, I thought you said something to this effect. I can't remember where and I can't find it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016

No sweat. Just don't want misunderstandings, because they spread like wildfire. Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Blink - 10-04-2016

(10-04-2016, 12:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: P3 takes WPS to the maximum possible. P4 scales it back to whatever is your optimal WPS at that moment. P5 then makes this value higher and more powerful and effective than P3 or P4, while maintaining the optimal effectiveness that P4 introduced for P3.

It's very hard to explain without giving away what is being done to achieve this goal, and I would understand if you either think it makes no sense, or if you don't believe it. When I first had the idea for P5, it excited the hell out of me and made me laugh because it seemed so preposterous that I didn't think it would work...

Yea this didn't make sense to me Tongue How can you make an optimal value higher, yet have the end result be more powerful and effective? Wouldn't that mean that it wasn't optimal to begin with?

Any example that's more concrete than that? Or would that give away too much?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 10-04-2016

(10-04-2016, 12:53 PM)Travis Wrote: I'm so very happy that Overcome Approach Anxiety will be added to v2.4.

Technically, OAA will be in V3.0.1.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016

(10-04-2016, 01:57 PM)Blink Wrote:
(10-04-2016, 12:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: P3 takes WPS to the maximum possible. P4 scales it back to whatever is your optimal WPS at that moment. P5 then makes this value higher and more powerful and effective than P3 or P4, while maintaining the optimal effectiveness that P4 introduced for P3.

It's very hard to explain without giving away what is being done to achieve this goal, and I would understand if you either think it makes no sense, or if you don't believe it. When I first had the idea for P5, it excited the hell out of me and made me laugh because it seemed so preposterous that I didn't think it would work...

Yea this didn't make sense to me Tongue How can you make an optimal value higher, yet have the end result be more powerful and effective? Wouldn't that mean that it wasn't optimal to begin with?

Any example that's more concrete than that? Or would that give away too much?

Two words for you. This is all I can say.

Reality bending.

Beyond that you'll just have to trust me on this...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 10-04-2016

Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016

(10-04-2016, 02:35 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/

There are various technologies that perform reality bending. They work together to form a greater influence.

You haven't noticed it because it's not supposed to be noticed in and of itself. And, you're also new to the game... most guys require a month on 2.4 to start seeing it.

Ask Chaos if he's noticed its effects yet Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 10-04-2016

(10-04-2016, 02:38 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-04-2016, 02:35 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/

There are various technologies that perform reality bending. They work together to form a greater influence.

You haven't noticed it because it's not supposed to be noticed in and of itself. And, you're also new to the game... most guys require a month on 2.4 to start seeing it.

Ask Chaos if he's noticed its effects yet Smile

B-but... I thought I was getting fast results? Tongue

jk. I understand.

Chaos, you're free to interject here, but am I correct to assume it was the sudden tinder and online dating interest?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016

(10-04-2016, 02:50 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(10-04-2016, 02:38 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-04-2016, 02:35 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/

There are various technologies that perform reality bending. They work together to form a greater influence.

You haven't noticed it because it's not supposed to be noticed in and of itself. And, you're also new to the game... most guys require a month on 2.4 to start seeing it.

Ask Chaos if he's noticed its effects yet Smile

B-but... I thought I was getting fast results? Tongue

jk. I understand.

Chaos, you're free to interject here, but am I correct to assume it was the sudden tinder and online dating interest?

You are getting fast results, and ironically, part of that is because of reality bending. It's like autopilot, though: you won't see it at work until you're looking back at what it has done.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 10-04-2016

(10-04-2016, 02:52 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-04-2016, 02:50 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(10-04-2016, 02:38 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-04-2016, 02:35 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/

There are various technologies that perform reality bending. They work together to form a greater influence.

You haven't noticed it because it's not supposed to be noticed in and of itself. And, you're also new to the game... most guys require a month on 2.4 to start seeing it.

Ask Chaos if he's noticed its effects yet Smile

B-but... I thought I was getting fast results? Tongue

jk. I understand.

Chaos, you're free to interject here, but am I correct to assume it was the sudden tinder and online dating interest?

You are getting fast results, and ironically, part of that is because of reality bending. It's like autopilot, though: you won't see it at work until you're looking back at what it has done.

Fair enough. And good to know. Smile