Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 09-28-2016

Thanks!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 09-28-2016

Hey Shannon, I hope you get over your cold/flu! Maybe you can test out MIR2 if you finish it soon.

When you get a chance to respond, I'd like to hear what you have to say about this:

I'm still on E2 and I recently made the realization that when I feel attracted to a girl, I feel weak. Like there's nothing/little I can do to make the feeling go away. I just feel that I'm in a losing position if I'm attracted to her but I don't know she's attracted to me. I know E2 will probably handle this, but what is this caused by (past experiences of failure, fear...)?

Thank you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-28-2016

(09-28-2016, 03:01 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Hey Shannon, I hope you get over your cold/flu! Maybe you can test out MIR2 if you finish it soon.

When you get a chance to respond, I'd like to hear what you have to say about this:

I'm still on E2 and I recently made the realization that when I feel attracted to a girl, I feel weak. Like there's nothing/little I can do to make the feeling go away. I just feel that I'm in a losing position if I'm attracted to her but I don't know she's attracted to me. I know E2 will probably handle this, but what is this caused by (past experiences of failure, fear...)?

Thank you.

The worst part is, I'm usually not motivated to work on MIR unless I have a cold or flu, but while I do, I can only work veeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyyyyy slowly.

Could be a lot of things. The subconscious, or at least, some parts of it, are very irrational. So no logical analysis can answer all of the question or with certainly.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Lowe - 09-28-2016

Shannon, I have a few questions about the fragrances you are working on, especially the aphrodisiacs.

How powerful are they? You mentioned before that there are no pheromones in it but you hope to achieve the effects without it. Would you say you have succeeded? How does it compare to the effect of subliminals (particularly MSI) in attracting people?

What is the price range you are thinking of for these fragrances?

I'm looking forward to trying it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-29-2016

(09-28-2016, 09:50 PM)Lowe Wrote: Shannon, I have a few questions about the fragrances you are working on, especially the aphrodisiacs.

How powerful are they? You mentioned before that there are no pheromones in it but you hope to achieve the effects without it. Would you say you have succeeded? How does it compare to the effect of subliminals (particularly MSI) in attracting people?

What is the price range you are thinking of for these fragrances?

I'm looking forward to trying it.

How do I quantify how "powerful" they are? Shall I invent a new unit of measurement? I don't know what your measuring stick looks like, what you would compare it to, or how it would work for you with your skin chemistry, or how well the scent would match your personality, or how much you would use, or what the race(s) you would expose would best respond to, or how long after application you expose them, or if they are attracted to or repelled by certain components, or a number of other things.

Black Velvet Mark 4 is considered very sexy by a lot of women, and on some guys it gets a lot of compliments. Mark 8 is very polarizing, and on some guys, it produces immediate sexual wetness and arousal in the female. That doesn't mean she's going to tell you that, or act on it... but back when I had two girlfriends, they could always both tell which one I was wearing immediately because of that response. Will every woman respond that way? I don't know. But for them, it was so attractive that it made them more eager for sex, and more enthusiastic. I know it turns off some women just as well. It also has some benefits socially, but just as frequently polarizes people in the other direction.

Celestia is for women, very feminine. Whenever one of my girlfriends would wear it, I would almost always respond with arousal initiate sex with her if it was possible. Made me very touchy-feely and seductive, couldn't stop smelling her. Will it affect all guys that way? I'm sure it won't. Have we had women try it and re-order it because of that effect and the social bonuses it brings? Yes.

Aphrodisiac fragrances use the synergistic blending of perfumery components with some level of aphrodisiac properties, blended at the right concentrations and ratios, to maximize those effects. That doesn't mean you'll necessarily get more sex or even get compliments. It all depends on the people involved, the amount used, the distance, time of exposure, circumstances, activity, etc. very much like pheromones.

Are these as powerful as pheromones? I don't really know. You'll have to get a sample and decide for yourself.

As for the price range, we haven't yet calculated the final cost, and it may differ depending on fragrance, but the "good stuff", which is almost entirely what we are planning to offer, is being aimed at making you happy to pay over $100 US for 50 mLs. We're planning on taking a no holds barred approach to quality of ingredients, and of course that gets expensive, so presume "over $100 US for 50 mLs", but don't assume it will be $100.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - THolt - 09-29-2016

"Just as an experiment, I ran the Beast 9 script through the Language Tool grammar and spelling checker. This is the first time the 6G prototype has ever had a spell check or grammar check run.

Spelling: Corrected 2 genuine spelling mistakes, added 27 new words to the dictionary.
Grammar: Flawless.
Document length: 109,669 words.

Not too shabby."

109,669 words? That's like a 350 page book.
That's impressive.

I can't believe all that will be pumped into our head. Wow


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-29-2016

(09-29-2016, 06:25 AM)THolt Wrote: "Just as an experiment, I ran the Beast 9 script through the Language Tool grammar and spelling checker. This is the first time the 6G prototype has ever had a spell check or grammar check run.

Spelling: Corrected 2 genuine spelling mistakes, added 27 new words to the dictionary.
Grammar: Flawless.
Document length: 109,669 words.

Not too shabby."

109,669 words? That's like a 350 page book.
That's impressive.

I can't believe all that will be pumped into our head. Wow

And that is after several compressions, with another major one forthcoming.

But not all of that will likely be appropriate for every title in 6G, so it's probably going to be less words for most titles. But, the smaller the word count, the better, because the faster the input happens. Beast 8 requires fully 20 minutes to input the whole script just once.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - THolt - 09-29-2016

(09-29-2016, 07:03 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(09-29-2016, 06:25 AM)THolt Wrote: "Just as an experiment, I ran the Beast 9 script through the Language Tool grammar and spelling checker. This is the first time the 6G prototype has ever had a spell check or grammar check run.

Spelling: Corrected 2 genuine spelling mistakes, added 27 new words to the dictionary.
Grammar: Flawless.
Document length: 109,669 words.

Not too shabby."

109,669 words? That's like a 350 page book.
That's impressive.

I can't believe all that will be pumped into our head. Wow

And that is after several compressions, with another major one forthcoming.

But not all of that will likely be appropriate for every title in 6G, so it's probably going to be less words for most titles. But, the smaller the word count, the better, because the faster the input happens. Beast 8 requires fully 20 minutes to input the whole script just once.

Wow. Okay. I thought all of these would have had that word count.

That would be hell to make haha


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Frosted - 09-29-2016

Shannon, I'm using sleephones now while I sleep instead of only speakers and I'm seeing way better results. Does this mean since I'm already two months through AM6 that it'll unbalance me or my results wont be as great since the first two months won't be as good as the later 4? Do you think I should just stick with what I was doing before and/or run AM6 again after this run using this better method for listening?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-29-2016

(09-29-2016, 08:14 AM)Frosted Wrote: Shannon, I'm using sleephones now while I sleep instead of only speakers and I'm seeing way better results. Does this mean since I'm already two months through AM6 that it'll unbalance me or my results wont be as great since the first two months won't be as good as the later 4? Do you think I should just stick with what I was doing before and/or run AM6 again after this run using this better method for listening?

Generally you should use the best listening device you can get your hands on. Phones are at the bottom of the list, and earphones/earbuds are best. Stick with what you're doing (better is always better) and then at the end, decide if you want to run it again or run refresher stage.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-29-2016

Just remembered something that sets my fragrances apart from others. Mine are designed to smell good on your skin, not from the bottle. Most fragrances are designed the reverse - they want you to impulse buy it based on your initial impression. Black Velvet Mark 4 and especially Mark 8 may take 20 to 45 minutes on skin to achieve the scent they are known and loved for. Not all of my fragrances take that long to achieve their goal scent, but the point is, I'm not interested in your impulse buy. I'm interested in whether or not it actually smells good on you for the longer period of time. So keep that in mind when you try my fragrances, and especially the unusual ones like Mark 8.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Frosted - 09-29-2016

Shannon, AM6 works to make us an "Ascendant Alpha" which I think can compared to the concept of a "sigma male" one who is independent from the group, yet strong. When you're more "alpha" but not the alpha of the group per se how do women react? Do they go for the "ascendant alpha" who is more developed or the guy who may be weaker but has more social status. I read somewhere that traditional alphas get the girl because of their status even if a sigma is stronger and more alpha, what is your take Shannon?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-29-2016

(09-29-2016, 11:43 AM)Frosted Wrote: Shannon, AM6 works to make us an "Ascendant Alpha" which I think can compared to the concept of a "sigma male" one who is independent from the group, yet strong. When you're more "alpha" but not the alpha of the group per se how do women react? Do they go for the "ascendant alpha" who is more developed or the guy who may be weaker but has more social status. I read somewhere that traditional alphas get the girl because of their status even if a sigma is stronger and more alpha, what is your take Shannon?

First point. Every man, and every woman, is going to be unique. So even if you had 10 "ascendant alphas" at a table, they might all have entirely different styles and personalities within that designation. That alone de-rails your question, but the same is true for all of the women they encounter.

Generally people are clueless. Traditional alphas are more obviously alpha, and ascendant alphas are more alpha. In either case, the woman must be aware of the man's alphaness and such before it makes a difference. That depends on various factors that will be determined by the individuals in play.

A poor traditional alpha, for example, might lose out to a rich ascendant alpha simply because the female(s) in question know he's rich. If the tables are reversed, the outcome might also be. Most women are not looking past their own nose when it comes to really valuing any particular man, and why should they, when they have armies of Betas AND PUAs trying to drown her in attention all day every day?

So it's not a question that you can answer as if all women respond the same to all men of one type. They don't.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ffaux - 09-29-2016

(09-29-2016, 12:24 PM)Shannon Wrote: Most women are not looking past their own nose when it comes to really valuing any particular man, and why should they, when they have armies of Betas AND PUAs trying to drown her in attention all day every day?

So how the hell do you get a woman to value/respect you?