Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 09-23-2016

I knew I had it I just thought it was easing up. Thanks Shannon.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 09-23-2016

(09-22-2016, 02:53 PM)Shannon Wrote: The sniper effect is based on the concept of focusing on specific attributes that you find attractive, and according to how attractive you find them. So when you come across a woman who has a stunning body, that's what will be the basis for the auric sniping. If she's plain, but has what you consider a sexy brain, then her brain will be the basis for the auric sniping. The more types of things about her that you find sexually attractive, and the more sexually attractive you find them, the more powerful the sniping effect becomes. It's not narrowing anything; all women get baseline aura effect. But a woman who has any trait you find attractive will get more for each such trait, and more according to how attractive it is to you.

This makes perfect sense. The chick from last week -- I didn't find her THAT physically attractive. I mean, she's pretty, but I don't really prefer skinny and blonde. If I saw her out in the street, I'd gloss over her like she didn't even exist. However, she possessed that natural, free-spirited feminine energy that I absolutely go bonkers for, one that most women have allowed society to suppress. And that's what attracted me to her so hard.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - THolt - 09-23-2016

(09-23-2016, 04:56 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(09-23-2016, 04:48 AM)THolt Wrote: "Beast 8 has a Minimum Time Of Singular Expression (MTOSE) of fully 20 minutes. That means that, to express the whole script at least once, it requires 20 minutes of exposure. Definitely time to re-compress. I like to keep the MTOSE down to a maximum of 5-10 minutes if possible."

Shannon,
Will this result in lower listening times for 6G programs if everything goes right?

I think I forgot to put this into perspective.

If it were not compressed to the degree that it is, that 20 minutes would be 16 hours plus of audio. It would take more than 16 hours of listening to hear the entire script just once. That's how beastly long the damned thing is.

So the fact that it's 20 minutes long and still comprehensible is amazing, but for my purposes, 20 minutes is the outer limits. I have to achieve the goals of the 6G prototype within 20 minutes, or the test fails.

So to answer your question, yes. Higher compression means faster input means lower listening times. Although that by itself is not the reason why it would require lower listening times; there are two other things along with compression that I use that, taken as a whole, result in these very low listening time requirements.

Wow 16 hours in 20 minutes. That would save us a lot of time in terms of listening of you are successful in the tests.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 09-23-2016

(09-23-2016, 06:44 AM)THolt Wrote:
(09-23-2016, 04:56 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(09-23-2016, 04:48 AM)THolt Wrote: "Beast 8 has a Minimum Time Of Singular Expression (MTOSE) of fully 20 minutes. That means that, to express the whole script at least once, it requires 20 minutes of exposure. Definitely time to re-compress. I like to keep the MTOSE down to a maximum of 5-10 minutes if possible."

Shannon,
Will this result in lower listening times for 6G programs if everything goes right?

I think I forgot to put this into perspective.

If it were not compressed to the degree that it is, that 20 minutes would be 16 hours plus of audio. It would take more than 16 hours of listening to hear the entire script just once. That's how beastly long the damned thing is.

So the fact that it's 20 minutes long and still comprehensible is amazing, but for my purposes, 20 minutes is the outer limits. I have to achieve the goals of the 6G prototype within 20 minutes, or the test fails.

So to answer your question, yes. Higher compression means faster input means lower listening times. Although that by itself is not the reason why it would require lower listening times; there are two other things along with compression that I use that, taken as a whole, result in these very low listening time requirements.

Wow 16 hours in 20 minutes. That would save us a lot of time in terms of listening of you are successful in the tests.

Reaction after reading this whole thing: Deeee-ammm!!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 09-23-2016

(09-23-2016, 12:08 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote:
(09-23-2016, 06:44 AM)THolt Wrote:
(09-23-2016, 04:56 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(09-23-2016, 04:48 AM)THolt Wrote: "Beast 8 has a Minimum Time Of Singular Expression (MTOSE) of fully 20 minutes. That means that, to express the whole script at least once, it requires 20 minutes of exposure. Definitely time to re-compress. I like to keep the MTOSE down to a maximum of 5-10 minutes if possible."

Shannon,
Will this result in lower listening times for 6G programs if everything goes right?

I think I forgot to put this into perspective.

If it were not compressed to the degree that it is, that 20 minutes would be 16 hours plus of audio. It would take more than 16 hours of listening to hear the entire script just once. That's how beastly long the damned thing is.

So the fact that it's 20 minutes long and still comprehensible is amazing, but for my purposes, 20 minutes is the outer limits. I have to achieve the goals of the 6G prototype within 20 minutes, or the test fails.

So to answer your question, yes. Higher compression means faster input means lower listening times. Although that by itself is not the reason why it would require lower listening times; there are two other things along with compression that I use that, taken as a whole, result in these very low listening time requirements.

Wow 16 hours in 20 minutes. That would save us a lot of time in terms of listening of you are successful in the tests.

Reaction after reading this whole thing: Deeee-ammm!!

Yeah it's impressive isn't it ?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Blink - 09-23-2016

Hey Shannon. Not sure where else to post this.

Other members feel free to chime in as well.

I'm on E2, it's been about 2 months. I've lately realized that I've become way clumsier than usual. For example, I've dropped my more than a year old phone 6 times overall, 4 of which were in the past couple of weeks. I also make the effort to return everything to its place, but lately I'm not, without noticing that I'm doing it. I also feel a little disconnect with some of my best friends and sometimes girlfriend, which is a little scary.

How are these related to healing?

Thanks! Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AlphaScorpio - 09-23-2016

(09-23-2016, 02:10 PM)Blink Wrote: Hey Shannon. Not sure where else to post this.

Other members feel free to chime in as well.

I'm on E2, it's been about 2 months. I've lately realized that I've become way clumsier than usual. For example, I've dropped my more than a year old phone 6 times overall, 4 of which were in the past couple of weeks. I also make the effort to return everything to its place, but lately I'm not, without noticing that I'm doing it. I also feel a little disconnect with some of my best friends and sometimes girlfriend, which is a little scary.

How are these related to healing?

Thanks! Smile

I noticed when I was on E2 I was bumping into things, dropping my phone, dropping pans onto the kitchen floor etc. I thought I had something wrong with me, haven't been doing any of that since stopping E2...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 09-23-2016

(09-23-2016, 02:10 PM)Blink Wrote: Hey Shannon. Not sure where else to post this.

Other members feel free to chime in as well.

I'm on E2, it's been about 2 months. I've lately realized that I've become way clumsier than usual. For example, I've dropped my more than a year old phone 6 times overall, 4 of which were in the past couple of weeks. I also make the effort to return everything to its place, but lately I'm not, without noticing that I'm doing it. I also feel a little disconnect with some of my best friends and sometimes girlfriend, which is a little scary.

How are these related to healing?

Thanks! Smile

E2 seems to bring some insecurity toward the surface. This could show in different ways, probably this is one way.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - mat422 - 09-23-2016

(09-23-2016, 02:10 PM)Blink Wrote: Hey Shannon. Not sure where else to post this.

Other members feel free to chime in as well.

I'm on E2, it's been about 2 months. I've lately realized that I've become way clumsier than usual. For example, I've dropped my more than a year old phone 6 times overall, 4 of which were in the past couple of weeks. I also make the effort to return everything to its place, but lately I'm not, without noticing that I'm doing it. I also feel a little disconnect with some of my best friends and sometimes girlfriend, which is a little scary.

How are these related to healing?

Thanks! Smile

I think this is just a sign of overdoing it with e2. How many hours are you listening? I've had similar stuff happen and i imagine it's because E2 demands a lot of your brain and doesn't leave room for other stuff.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Blink - 09-23-2016

(09-23-2016, 02:55 PM)mat422 Wrote: I think this is just a sign of overdoing it with e2. How many hours are you listening? I've had similar stuff happen and i imagine it's because E2 demands a lot of your brain and doesn't leave room for other stuff.

Makes sense, I do around 12, about 8 ultrasonic and 4 masked. What was yours back then?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RisingSon - 09-23-2016

(09-23-2016, 06:04 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: Shannon,

I know this question have been answered in another thread but I want to ask this again for sureness.

Can I mixed your masked sub with another frequencies like 417 hz/528 hz all in one using audacity and make them into one mp3/flac file? Does it matter?

Thanks.

Interesting question that I wonder what tonal frequency the subs are set at. 432hz or 528hz would certainly make relaxation, healing, and overall enjoyment deeper while perhaps enhancing effectiveness.

And regarding that enormous sig, I'm starting to realize reality is so malleable that even the past can be re-imagined and all spent energy on things like worry can be commanded to return to us. Really empowering, just give it a shot. Hehe... Sounds crazy but what ya gonna do.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 09-23-2016

(09-22-2016, 11:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: How about we remember what DMSI is for - giving THEM the "balls to act", not you!

In my observations, that seems to be the one that is standing out most by its absence. It's tough because it's about women internally fighting with their conditioning, fears of what everyone will think of them, fears of rejection, feeling un-feminine by being the initiator, etc. You picked a tough challenge, Shannon.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 09-23-2016

(09-22-2016, 02:53 PM)Shannon Wrote: The sniper effect is based on the concept of focusing on specific attributes that you find attractive, and according to how attractive you find them. So when you come across a woman who has a stunning body, that's what will be the basis for the auric sniping. If she's plain, but has what you consider a sexy brain, then her brain will be the basis for the auric sniping. The more types of things about her that you find sexually attractive, and the more sexually attractive you find them, the more powerful the sniping effect becomes. It's not narrowing anything; all women get baseline aura effect. But a woman who has any trait you find attractive will get more for each such trait, and more according to how attractive it is to you.

This has nothing to do with the manifestation modules. Those are actually going to get a complete overhaul, since I want to get them to behave in a synergistic manner and aim more specifically to manifest sex.

I knew it! I wasn't hallucinating! That explains partly why there were these stunning women I talked with yet I felt very little attraction for them even if they were giving me IOIs.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ffaux - 09-23-2016

Are you familiar with this information?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit_self-esteem

It seems particularly relevant to developing self-esteem through subliminals.