(08-31-2016, 06:33 AM)Steven Wrote: 6) I think women are more likely to run long term scenarios through their minds about “what it would be like to be with a man”, imagining a future and how all that meshes with their life plans and other relationships.

Shannon Wrote:Alright.

After considering, I have decided to build 2.4, but I have to calculate which of the healing modules will be included.

Then I'm going to spend September developing the foundation for future 6 stage sets in 5.5/6g. We'll observe what 2.4 does during September and build 3.0 as I have time.

Tonight I'll calculate the healing modules and start 2.4. Maybe I'll add in a surprise to spice things up some.

(08-31-2016, 06:26 AM)bogdy Wrote:

(08-30-2016, 08:57 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(08-30-2016, 08:35 PM)AriGold Wrote:

(08-30-2016, 08:05 PM)Shannon Wrote: The 2.x series is finished. I just need to have a little time and energy to get started working on 3.0. The additions to 3.0 are many, though, so it's reasonable to think it may take 4 to 6 weeks to finish.

I'm not entirely sure if I understand correctly:

Does that mean, there won't be a DMSI 2.4?
You wrote before the DMSI 3.0 will not be a free upgrade, is that correct?

There will not be a 2.4 because it is better for me to simply start working on 3.0. And I had originally been wanting to reserve 3.0 for making money on, but 2.x is not good enough for me to know that 3.0 will be sufficiently effective. So I concluded that it is better to set aside trying to make money in the short term, for achieving the goal faster in the long term, without pissing off my customers.

So no, there will be no charge for 3.0 if you have a paid copy of 1.0 or 2.x.

Will v3.0 still be gender neutral?
It will be based on physical sources of energy?
And the end goal will remain the same?
It will include healing modules?
And thank you for your decision to make it a free upgrade!

(08-31-2016, 10:06 AM)maxx55 Wrote: If Shannon ends up releasing a 2 stager for DMSI, he should mostly ignore people who skip a stage and complain of lackluster results. There will always be people who don't follow directions but if 2 stages are needed for it to work, then so be it.

I'm only curious how the 2 stage process would work. For six stagers, it's 32 days per stage. Would it be the same for DMSI's 2 stages or would people be able to complete stage 1 and then run stage 2 indefinitely?

(08-31-2016, 03:33 PM)dissonance Wrote: Shannon, what were the differences between 2.2 and 2.3 in all areas OTHER than the healing module removal?

(08-31-2016, 05:08 PM)THolt Wrote: In reference to this section
"Then I'm going to spend September developing the foundation for future 6 stage sets in 5.5/6g. We'll observe what 2.4 does during September and build 3.0 as I have time."

Which six stages will be in 5.5G vs 6G?

(08-31-2016, 05:34 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(08-31-2016, 05:08 PM)THolt Wrote: In reference to this section
"Then I'm going to spend September developing the foundation for future 6 stage sets in 5.5/6g. We'll observe what 2.4 does during September and build 3.0 as I have time."

Which six stages will be in 5.5G vs 6G?

My plans are to release nothing in 5.5G to the public as a six stage set. Everything released as a six stage set to the public will be in full 6G. That was not worded well.