Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-01-2016

(08-01-2016, 03:39 PM)bogdy Wrote: Shannon since i dont have a jurnal and i dont intend making one i will tell you my observation on dmsi 2.2 testing.
First of all i've started v2.2 after 5 days of 2.1 so i'm not valid.
What i have observed about 2.2 is that when you need something to heal you project no aura, you only heal , i never felt the aura or anything , i even run 5 loops and nothing. I think all the results i see from v2.2 are from the healing modules since i've had few deep conversation with girls, in the last 4 years i only had basic, meaningless conversation with girls , i feel more secure in myself around girls and i had a masive drop in neediness. The manifestation part is there and it's working , i've had girls interested in me but poor response from my part . I got stares , butt presentation , touching , smiles , and one girl talked with me about sex ,when I tried something with her , she withdraws.
One think i need to add , when you resist you are a ghost , every time i had resistance i was (and felt) like i'm invisible.

When you resist, you're trying to hide. Of course you feel invisible. Just keep going.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-01-2016

(08-01-2016, 08:30 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: still looking forward to "dream your best solution' 5.5g/6g...well on can dream, cant He!?? :-) could have resisted da pun but I obviously didnt wanna! dreaming.

Good one. Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-01-2016

(08-01-2016, 08:10 PM)K-Train Wrote: Kicking the healing module may end up creating new issues such as guys not being able to capitalize on opportunities created due to guilt, shame, and fear. That said, without the healing module other shit may kick in from DMSI and this may increase the opportunities presented perhaps by a significant margin for most users.

Depending on how things work out, DMSI may have to operate on its own with the singular focus being on getting you sex, with healing being a goal reserved exclusively for E2. But we're entering into week 3 of DMSI for most people so we still have until late August/early September before most guys reach 6 weeks.

I'm thinking that maybe what we need to do is have two versions - one with, and one without the healing modules. Perhaps "Healing" and "Hunting". Or Stage 1 and 2.

But I still need to learn a few things before I'm sure what to do next. I do have a lot of interesting ideas though.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 08-01-2016

(08-01-2016, 08:20 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-31-2016, 07:23 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(07-29-2016, 05:47 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-29-2016, 11:39 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I have a question about autopilot. Basically it's this: whenever I just act without thinking, I get bad results/reactions/everything. Whenever I consciously focus on what I';m doing, I get good results/reactions/everything. What's going on there? Is my subconscious faulty?

If memory serves, you are not using DMSI, correct?

If that is correct, then you're not going to get program induced autopiloting. You'll have times where you naturally experience the same phenomenon, but if it leads to negative outcomes, then it's because the "autopilot" (your subconscious) is running faulty programming. I.e., erroneous beliefs are being expressed.

Now if you are running DMSI, and you're still having this problem, then you've got a situation in which your old beliefs are trying to dominate your incoming beliefs and express themselves instead. It will take time.

Your subconscious is not faulty, but what it believes to be true is. You just need to change that.

I didn't see this till just now.

I'm not using DMSI, that is correct.

If what I'm believing is incorrect, then how can I believe otherwise, especially if a new belief won't "work" because I don't believe it?

Isn't that how it works? Beliefs only work if you believe them?

Beliefs only work if you believe them? Beliefs are what you believe. You cannot not believe them, because they are beliefs.

If what you are believing is incorrect, then as Chaos stated, the program code (belief) needs to be replaced with a new section of code. When this is done, it becomes the belief, and you execute it just as you did the previous section of code, and execution makes it real by acting on it and acting as if it is real in the ways that make it real, both internally and externally.

The purpose of subs, of course, is to rewrite sections of code in your "operating system" (subconscious), and in the equivalent of "userland programs" (conscious).

Well that's my point: If I believe X but am supposed to believe Y, how can I ever believe Y? X tells me that Y doesn't work, so whenever I try Y, Y doesn't work because I believe X does.

Furthermore, how come believing X doesn't make X happen?

I still don't understand apparently. Undecided


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-01-2016

(08-01-2016, 10:40 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(08-01-2016, 08:20 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-31-2016, 07:23 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(07-29-2016, 05:47 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-29-2016, 11:39 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I have a question about autopilot. Basically it's this: whenever I just act without thinking, I get bad results/reactions/everything. Whenever I consciously focus on what I';m doing, I get good results/reactions/everything. What's going on there? Is my subconscious faulty?

If memory serves, you are not using DMSI, correct?

If that is correct, then you're not going to get program induced autopiloting. You'll have times where you naturally experience the same phenomenon, but if it leads to negative outcomes, then it's because the "autopilot" (your subconscious) is running faulty programming. I.e., erroneous beliefs are being expressed.

Now if you are running DMSI, and you're still having this problem, then you've got a situation in which your old beliefs are trying to dominate your incoming beliefs and express themselves instead. It will take time.

Your subconscious is not faulty, but what it believes to be true is. You just need to change that.

I didn't see this till just now.

I'm not using DMSI, that is correct.

If what I'm believing is incorrect, then how can I believe otherwise, especially if a new belief won't "work" because I don't believe it?

Isn't that how it works? Beliefs only work if you believe them?

Beliefs only work if you believe them? Beliefs are what you believe. You cannot not believe them, because they are beliefs.

If what you are believing is incorrect, then as Chaos stated, the program code (belief) needs to be replaced with a new section of code. When this is done, it becomes the belief, and you execute it just as you did the previous section of code, and execution makes it real by acting on it and acting as if it is real in the ways that make it real, both internally and externally.

The purpose of subs, of course, is to rewrite sections of code in your "operating system" (subconscious), and in the equivalent of "userland programs" (conscious).

Well that's my point: If I believe X but am supposed to believe Y, how can I ever believe Y? X tells me that Y doesn't work, so whenever I try Y, Y doesn't work because I believe X does.

Furthermore, how come believing X doesn't make X happen?

I still don't understand apparently. Undecided

While X is dominant, Y will fail because X will derail it. In most people, simply listening to Y enough times will overwrite X. In some rare cases, the conscious mind is too invested in reinforcing X. This is likely why you have so much trouble.

5.5g/6G should significantly help with the process though.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 08-01-2016

(08-01-2016, 10:44 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(08-01-2016, 10:40 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(08-01-2016, 08:20 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-31-2016, 07:23 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(07-29-2016, 05:47 PM)Shannon Wrote: If memory serves, you are not using DMSI, correct?

If that is correct, then you're not going to get program induced autopiloting. You'll have times where you naturally experience the same phenomenon, but if it leads to negative outcomes, then it's because the "autopilot" (your subconscious) is running faulty programming. I.e., erroneous beliefs are being expressed.

Now if you are running DMSI, and you're still having this problem, then you've got a situation in which your old beliefs are trying to dominate your incoming beliefs and express themselves instead. It will take time.

Your subconscious is not faulty, but what it believes to be true is. You just need to change that.

I didn't see this till just now.

I'm not using DMSI, that is correct.

If what I'm believing is incorrect, then how can I believe otherwise, especially if a new belief won't "work" because I don't believe it?

Isn't that how it works? Beliefs only work if you believe them?

Beliefs only work if you believe them? Beliefs are what you believe. You cannot not believe them, because they are beliefs.

If what you are believing is incorrect, then as Chaos stated, the program code (belief) needs to be replaced with a new section of code. When this is done, it becomes the belief, and you execute it just as you did the previous section of code, and execution makes it real by acting on it and acting as if it is real in the ways that make it real, both internally and externally.

The purpose of subs, of course, is to rewrite sections of code in your "operating system" (subconscious), and in the equivalent of "userland programs" (conscious).

Well that's my point: If I believe X but am supposed to believe Y, how can I ever believe Y? X tells me that Y doesn't work, so whenever I try Y, Y doesn't work because I believe X does.

Furthermore, how come believing X doesn't make X happen?

I still don't understand apparently. Undecided

While X is dominant, Y will fail because X will derail it. In most people, simply listening to Y enough times will overwrite X. In some rare cases, the conscious mind is too invested in reinforcing X. This is likely why you have so much trouble.

5.5g/6G should significantly help with the process though.

That's good.

But what about the other issue? Why doesn't believing in X make X real?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Hold007 - 08-02-2016

shannon you never gave feedback on my product idea.

I wanted to know now that technology is better than 2011 can you now make a sub to:

win the lottery jackpot 5.5g/6g

or make a sub to see into the future for things like sports games so you can make bets and make bank. so something like:

view the future 5.5g/6g

or even make a sub like Luck Magnifier 5.5g/6g

please get back to me


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 08-02-2016

(08-01-2016, 08:48 PM)RTBoss Wrote:
(08-01-2016, 06:48 PM)bogdy Wrote: I did 208 days of E2 before DMSI

You must be including time with E1. E2 was only released in early March...

Yeah you actually right I did 116days :-) , sorry my bad.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 08-02-2016

(08-01-2016, 10:17 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(08-01-2016, 03:39 PM)bogdy Wrote: Shannon since i dont have a jurnal and i dont intend making one i will tell you my observation on dmsi 2.2 testing.
First of all i've started v2.2 after 5 days of 2.1 so i'm not valid.
What i have observed about 2.2 is that when you need something to heal you project no aura, you only heal , i never felt the aura or anything , i even run 5 loops and nothing. I think all the results i see from v2.2 are from the healing modules since i've had few deep conversation with girls, in the last 4 years i only had basic, meaningless conversation with girls , i feel more secure in myself around girls and i had a masive drop in neediness. The manifestation part is there and it's working , i've had girls interested in me but poor response from my part . I got stares , butt presentation , touching , smiles , and one girl talked with me about sex ,when I tried something with her , she withdraws.
One think i need to add , when you resist you are a ghost , every time i had resistance i was (and felt) like i'm invisible.

When you resist, you're trying to hide. Of course you feel invisible. Just keep going.

"If you're going through hell, keep going! ''

Thanks!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-02-2016

(08-02-2016, 02:23 AM)Hold007 Wrote: shannon you never gave feedback on my product idea.

I wanted to know now that technology is better than 2011 can you now make a sub to:

win the lottery jackpot 5.5g/6g

or make a sub to see into the future for things like sports games so you can make bets and make bank. so something like:

view the future 5.5g/6g

or even make a sub like Luck Magnifier 5.5g/6g

please get back to me

I can do a lot more than in 2011, but I don't think it will ever realistically be possible to make a sub that just wins you the lottery. And if it was, it would suddenly not be profitable for the house, and lotteries would disappear faster than lightning. They exist to make someone a profit, and it's not players.

Viewing the future might be possible, but I would have to do a lot of experimentation to see what is really possible. That takes a lot of time,which I don't have right now.

Luck Magnifier on the other hand, works on the difference in the perception of reality and time between the conscious and subconscious minds. I know I can make that, and as popular as it is, a 5.5 or 6g version is very likely.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - THolt - 08-02-2016

(08-01-2016, 10:12 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-31-2016, 05:50 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Shannon: I Know this was brougth up a while back ...but will BAMM be getting a 5.5/6g re-vamp,re-do and will it be LATER this year as in december sometime as a beginning of a re-do of BAMM in 6g or will that be next spring 2017 some time? forgive me coz Im know you've answered some such, two months ago,I forgot. sooo much has transpried and happened since then. thnx. Keith..

It will probably be re-done in 6G, sometime next year or in 2018.

That's sooner than I anticipated based off of your current workload

I'm really looking forward to it!!

How many 6G technologies do you anticipate being in BAMM 3.0?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Hold007 - 08-02-2016

also shannon why dont you make a sub to astral travel for us and yourself. I've tried loads of ways to astral travel and cant do it so maybe you can make a sub for it. You might be able to find the missing pieces for subs like dmsi. You could also add in protection and the ability to remember your astral travel experience.

Also please upgrade the eyesight sub, make it: restore eyesight back to 20/20 vision 5.5g/6g.

Thanks


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 08-02-2016

(08-01-2016, 10:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: I'm thinking that maybe what we need to do is have two versions - one with, and one without the healing modules. Perhaps "Healing" and "Hunting". Or Stage 1 and 2.

But I still need to learn a few things before I'm sure what to do next. I do have a lot of interesting ideas though.

If you make it two stage you should put something in the healing stage what lets you know when you are done with healing and can move on to stage 2.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Light - 08-02-2016

(08-02-2016, 10:46 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(08-01-2016, 10:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: I'm thinking that maybe what we need to do is have two versions - one with, and one without the healing modules. Perhaps "Healing" and "Hunting". Or Stage 1 and 2.

But I still need to learn a few things before I'm sure what to do next. I do have a lot of interesting ideas though.

If you make it two stage you should put something in the healing stage what lets you know when you are done with healing and can move on to stage 2.

I second here Anderson's, something that could tell us that we are done with the clearing and then move to the second stage which is all about the auras and scripting of sexual irresistability. I am quite content with version2.2 and thankful for it. But this new thought of two stages is a brilliant one Shannon and deserves a bit of your time.