Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 07-16-2016

Shannon,

Thank you for the clarification about the classifications.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 07-16-2016

(07-16-2016, 07:01 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-16-2016, 08:54 AM)dissonance Wrote:
(07-15-2016, 08:59 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-15-2016, 08:06 AM)dissonance Wrote: Is the ASRB a very important aspect of the 5.5? What's the possibility of removing it, so that it can be listened to without requiring several hours straight of uninterrupted listening? I understand people are willing to put in the work and effort to listen to subs, but I feel like this requirement of listening uninterrupted for several hours is hard to achieve and structure around daily life.

ASRB is a technology that required 6 months to develop. If it wasn't solving a serious issue, why would I do that?

ASRB takes about an hour to calculate and implement at the end of a very long, very intricate build process. Why would I do that if it wasn't important?

You guys ask for miracles and when I give you what you ask for, you decide it's not good enough or you want it to be easier or more convenient. Well thete are limits to what is possible. You want to get the results? You want to be safe? Do it my way.

Don't change the subs.

Got it. Didn't know these things, that's why I asked, sorry. And I didn't mean to sounds like I was trying to "decide it's not good enough", I apologize if I did.

By the way, are MYP subs 5.5G compatible? If so, is MYP Stunningly Beautiful and Physically Gorgeous Girlfriend 5.5G a possibility? (and/or any of the variants, blonde, mixed race, brunette, etc, including just Perfect Girlfriend with no prefix)?

It's been relatively stressful for me lately to try so hard to create programs to achieve virtually impossible goals (DMSI) and then observe the response it gets. Very frustrating. It has also left me somewhat short of patience. So if my response is not appropriate, just take it with a grain of salt.

I haven't finished figuring out how to make manifestation all it can be in subliminals.

Theoretically, all I need to do is pop the core statement from a MYP 5G in the 5.5G skeleton script and away we go. Realistically, nothing is ever that simple.

All good! I gotchu. Well lets have this be an official request for future endeavors... MYP Stunningly Beautiful and Physically Gorgeous Girlfriend 5.5G. Big Grin


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 07-16-2016

(07-16-2016, 06:56 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-15-2016, 11:42 PM)heavysm Wrote: So for my example of 80 days versus 96, would 80 days be the same as 64 days in terms of our brains assimilating the extra listening time?

This makes no sense to me.

Ok, for example we're supposed to listen for 32 days starting out. Not 20 days, or 15, but 32 with consistent listening for each day (ideally).

If we don't listen for 32 days it's considered a waste since it takes the full 32 to assimilate changes (more permanent effect).

For the 96 day thing, since that's 3 x 32 days, I'm wondering if cutting it short to like 80 days means we technically only listened for 64 days (2 complete cycles, and not 3)?

I was under the impression that our brains sort of reset if we don't complete any given cycle of 32 days. So we literally waste our time even if we listen for 31 days, stop, then our brains go back as if we didn't listen at all.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-16-2016

(07-16-2016, 09:23 PM)heavysm Wrote:
(07-16-2016, 06:56 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-15-2016, 11:42 PM)heavysm Wrote: So for my example of 80 days versus 96, would 80 days be the same as 64 days in terms of our brains assimilating the extra listening time?

This makes no sense to me.

Ok, for example we're supposed to listen for 32 days starting out. Not 20 days, or 15, but 32 with consistent listening for each day (ideally).

If we don't listen for 32 days it's considered a waste since it takes the full 32 to assimilate changes (more permanent effect).

For the 96 day thing, since that's 3 x 32 days, I'm wondering if cutting it short to like 80 days means we technically only listened for 64 days (2 complete cycles, and not 3)?

I was under the impression that our brains sort of reset if we don't complete any given cycle of 32 days. So we literally waste our time even if we listen for 31 days, stop, then our brains go back as if we didn't listen at all.

Okay, I understand.

No you get "credit" for every day listened, because every repetition builds the strength of the relevant neural pathways.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 07-16-2016

(07-16-2016, 07:02 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-16-2016, 09:40 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(07-15-2016, 09:29 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: I wonder if anyone had some strange reaction to V2.2. Did it yesterday for one loop. After almost an hour my heart was beating like crazy and I felt a pain in my chest but I finished the loop. Today I started listening and had the same after not even 20min so I stopped here. It has been four days since stopping V2.1, so not a valid tester. However, interested if anyone experienced similar things.

Ok, looks like nobody else has problems like these mentioned above. Today I did one loop again. Almost no pain in my chest but felt completely overwhelmed afterwards. Went swimming later, but had to go home soon. Felt panic and like almost collapsed. Don't know why this is happening. Either I am not able to adjust myself to these high energy levels or my subconscious would rather knock me out than making me irresistibly. Didn't experienced something like that with previous versions, just slightly increased heartbeat.

It sounds like you are experiencing a reaction to extreme fear being triggered by the program's instruction set. I would suggest no more than one loop a day, and at a moderate to low volume, until this reaction fades.

Yeah, I suspect something like this. It probably fits well with my outer experience. Until now it's more like aura of invisibility. Children were almost running into me a few times, customers who came after me at the supermarket were almost served first, and even if I was alone at the service point, stuff isn't noticing me forever (or just doesn't care, don't know). I feel a bit like a ghost.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-16-2016

(07-16-2016, 10:27 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(07-16-2016, 07:02 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-16-2016, 09:40 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(07-15-2016, 09:29 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: I wonder if anyone had some strange reaction to V2.2. Did it yesterday for one loop. After almost an hour my heart was beating like crazy and I felt a pain in my chest but I finished the loop. Today I started listening and had the same after not even 20min so I stopped here. It has been four days since stopping V2.1, so not a valid tester. However, interested if anyone experienced similar things.

Ok, looks like nobody else has problems like these mentioned above. Today I did one loop again. Almost no pain in my chest but felt completely overwhelmed afterwards. Went swimming later, but had to go home soon. Felt panic and like almost collapsed. Don't know why this is happening. Either I am not able to adjust myself to these high energy levels or my subconscious would rather knock me out than making me irresistibly. Didn't experienced something like that with previous versions, just slightly increased heartbeat.

It sounds like you are experiencing a reaction to extreme fear being triggered by the program's instruction set. I would suggest no more than one loop a day, and at a moderate to low volume, until this reaction fades.

Yeah, I suspect something like this. It probably fits well with my outer experience. Until now it's more like aura of invisibility. Children were almost running into me a few times, customers who came after me at the supermarket were almost served first, and even if I was alone at the service point, stuff isn't noticing me forever (or just doesn't care, don't know). I feel a bit like a ghost.

Are you saying the program makes you feel like a ghost, or you used to before it?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 07-17-2016

(07-16-2016, 11:04 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-16-2016, 10:27 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(07-16-2016, 07:02 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-16-2016, 09:40 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(07-15-2016, 09:29 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: I wonder if anyone had some strange reaction to V2.2. Did it yesterday for one loop. After almost an hour my heart was beating like crazy and I felt a pain in my chest but I finished the loop. Today I started listening and had the same after not even 20min so I stopped here. It has been four days since stopping V2.1, so not a valid tester. However, interested if anyone experienced similar things.

Ok, looks like nobody else has problems like these mentioned above. Today I did one loop again. Almost no pain in my chest but felt completely overwhelmed afterwards. Went swimming later, but had to go home soon. Felt panic and like almost collapsed. Don't know why this is happening. Either I am not able to adjust myself to these high energy levels or my subconscious would rather knock me out than making me irresistibly. Didn't experienced something like that with previous versions, just slightly increased heartbeat.

It sounds like you are experiencing a reaction to extreme fear being triggered by the program's instruction set. I would suggest no more than one loop a day, and at a moderate to low volume, until this reaction fades.

Yeah, I suspect something like this. It probably fits well with my outer experience. Until now it's more like aura of invisibility. Children were almost running into me a few times, customers who came after me at the supermarket were almost served first, and even if I was alone at the service point, stuff isn't noticing me forever (or just doesn't care, don't know). I feel a bit like a ghost.

Are you saying the program makes you feel like a ghost, or you used to before it?

The last time I was almost invisible was before AM6. This "invisibility" occurred only with V2.2. So this could be an extreme fear trying to hide me, or even a conflict with V2.1 as there was only a 4 days gap between both of them.

With V1 I got extreme outer effects after not even a whole loop, but the results decreased fast, with every day more. With V2.1 not many IOIs, but got some here and there (also this extreme one with the 15 year old teen) as well as really good inner effects. V2.2 feels just extreme intense and overwhelming until now, so maybe it's like with too many mones, don't know (no, I didn't use mones).

Today the loop seem to go better but can't tell about outer effects. Anyway, still contemplating about a break and either continue with E2, because I wasn't done as I stopped, just wanted to experience what DMSI is doing at the current state. Or doing V2.1 for a month (because of the good inner effects I noticed) and then continue E2 until December before I try V2.2 again.

EDIT: Went for a walk at the park. Many people were there, but no looks or IOIs. But nobody was running into me or something.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 07-17-2016

Shannon to who would you generaly recommend E6?
So that after E2 they should fully accept and act on other subs like SM3!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Natious - 07-17-2016

(07-17-2016, 02:35 AM)Kurohawk Wrote: Shannon to who would you generaly recommend E6?
So that after E2 they should fully accept and act on other subs like SM3!

Anyone who's not currently living an amazing life and consistently going for their dreams can benefit from E2 in my opinion.
How I see it is that someone healthy can already do all the things that the big programs guide you to do (SM, AM, BAMM). A healthy person already has boundaries, accepts his/her sexuality and goes for what they want! Even if it's seemingly impossible. Other subs just help you move there faster. BUT, without being healthy and having a strong base (that's the aim of E2), you will face a lot of negativity on your journey and possibly will miss all the amazing things on your journey.

Even worse, you might have gone for the wrong things for the wrong reasons. This will be very hard to admit to yourself, but it happens to everyone at some point. These are few of the reasons why I run E2.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bookstacks DC737 - 07-17-2016

Does DMSI have a tangible effect on confidence and socializing? I start a sales job next week and I have an interest in DMSI as well, would be great if the sub could assist in increasing my sales #s


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - jonathan4all - 07-17-2016

(07-17-2016, 10:29 AM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: Does DMSI have a tangible effect on confidence and socializing? I start a sales job next week and I have an interest in DMSI as well, would be great if the sub could assist in increasing my sales #s

You confidence and socializing will be towards your goal which is "sex" in DMSI. You should run a more general improvement sub like AM6 or ASC or BASE or exclusively AYPJ (Attract your perfect job) to fulfill your goal. Your endgame is more important than an instant gratification. Choose wisely.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - myth - 07-17-2016

(07-14-2016, 09:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: The new goal script may never be revealed. Probably will, but might not.

I'm not asking you to reveal the specific DMSI goal at all and am oddly fine not knowing what it is, but I was curious about something. Yesterday was my first real time spent around other people all week, and two extremely clear responders (one of whom was very open to me kissing her within minutes of having met me and asked me to bump into her at a future event) both mentioned their ages to me.

IIRC, you said that the "age of consent" component wasn't part of the winning version of DMSI 2.2's goal? I only wonder because the age admissions were unprompted by either side of the conversation. Admittedly, they also mentioned other non sequitur details that included fertility, outright attraction, and indirect admission of polyamory, so age could've just been another thing that went into their conversational personal ad. Still, if there's no explicit reference to age in 2.2, it makes me wonder if we elicit the specific details that might subconsciously matter to us or only the ones that they think might matter to us. I know that I look half my age, but they also looked young for theirs (they were both the same age) too, so I'm not sure whose list their age was on - mine or theirs. Maybe both.

Oh, also, while I seem to be providing DMSI feedback anyhow: While I didn't notice it with version 1 and could be completely wrong, I think that 2.2 (and 2.1 before it) may be manifesting others (assistants?) into helping me achieve the goal of becoming or being seen as sexier by others. I've seen at least four examples since 2.1 came out. No idea if it's just the OE doing its job or something else, but it's interesting.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - lokko - 07-17-2016

Shannon can you create a sub that focuses on Balancing The Autonomic Nervous System. I believe my sexual trauma comes from this issue and is why I have premature ejaculation. Maybe potentially can be added to Ephra v3? Or be added to the premature ejaculation sub that I am planning to run in 3 months.

Real reports:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23102443

Also I think balancing the autonomic system will also help people with other problems such as anxiety, excessive sweating (Which I have), panics, fear..etc


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-17-2016

(07-17-2016, 01:04 PM)myth Wrote:
(07-14-2016, 09:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: The new goal script may never be revealed. Probably will, but might not.

I'm not asking you to reveal the specific DMSI goal at all and am oddly fine not knowing what it is, but I was curious about something. Yesterday was my first real time spent around other people all week, and two extremely clear responders (one of whom was very open to me kissing her within minutes of having met me and asked me to bump into her at a future event) both mentioned their ages to me.

IIRC, you said that the "age of consent" component wasn't part of the winning version of DMSI 2.2's goal? I only wonder because the age admissions were unprompted by either side of the conversation. Admittedly, they also mentioned other non sequitur details that included fertility, outright attraction, and indirect admission of polyamory, so age could've just been another thing that went into their conversational personal ad. Still, if there's no explicit reference to age in 2.2, it makes me wonder if we elicit the specific details that might subconsciously matter to us or only the ones that they think might matter to us. I know that I look half my age, but they also looked young for theirs (they were both the same age) too, so I'm not sure whose list their age was on - mine or theirs. Maybe both.

Oh, also, while I seem to be providing DMSI feedback anyhow: While I didn't notice it with version 1 and could be completely wrong, I think that 2.2 (and 2.1 before it) may be manifesting others (assistants?) into helping me achieve the goal of becoming or being seen as sexier by others. I've seen at least four examples since 2.1 came out. No idea if it's just the OE doing its job or something else, but it's interesting.

The current goal phrasing does not limit by age directly.