Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 08:11 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: Still thinking about releasing it early to people that skipped v2? If so, I'm in on Wednesday, Thursday or both.

We shall see about that when I have had a little sleep. Brain is mush right now. Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 07-11-2016

It'd be awesome. I have a date on Wednesday and a meetup on Thursday (the same one I went to when I first started running v1). Plan on doing Uber after both... that is, unless Wednesday's date ends with me reaching the "program's goal."

That means f*ckin' -- for the youngins. Wink


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-11-2016

I still have to calculate usage patterns. Too tired for that right now. These 5.5G programs are getting to be so complex that just building the script into a completed program may start being a multi-day process if this keeps up!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 07-11-2016

I coulda sworn Shannon reiterated no 5G and up are to be used together, period?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-11-2016

I'm sure Chaos won't be the only one to volunteer for demonstrating why it's a bad idea...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 08:21 PM)RTBoss Wrote: I coulda sworn Shannon reiterated no 5G and up are to be used together, period?

Person #1: Hey man, I heard chaosvrgn's about to break the rules, not follow instructions, expose himself to a dangerous situation and just live life with no limits. Again.

Person #2: In other news, water is wet.

That didn't stop ya'll from enjoying my v1 antics. Let's not get pious now.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 09:26 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon, do you think it'd be more effective to rotate AM6 and E2 (6 months)? Or do you think it would be more effective to run E2 for a long time like a year and then just run AM6 after that for awhile?

Do you think it's a good thing to let a program have a solid focus for a long time to go deeper or do you think it's good to just rotate every so often so things don't get too stale and also to not let things become unbalanced?

Edit: also this question could be posed for SM3 and AM6. Should you run AM6 for a long time and then work on SM3 for a long time? Or should you rotate them and work on them together?

Good question for the BASE users as well. If it is best to do 6 months BASE 1 month E 2, and do that over and over then I'd definitely be up for that.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Vincent_Vega - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 08:17 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: It'd be awesome. I have a date on Wednesday and a meetup on Thursday (the same one I went to when I first started running v1). Plan on doing Uber after both... that is, unless Wednesday's date ends with me reaching the "program's goal."

That means f*ckin' -- for the youngins. Wink

Prom&gratuduation night on saturday (not mine) and didn't use v2.1 for a few days already. So good testing ground for DMSI v2.2. Early release would be appreciatedTongue


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Natious - 07-12-2016

Would testosterone supplement usage conflict with E2? To me it seems like they wouldn't align very well.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 07-12-2016

Testosterone supplements?
How old are you?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 07-12-2016

(07-11-2016, 08:28 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 08:21 PM)RTBoss Wrote: I coulda sworn Shannon reiterated no 5G and up are to be used together, period?

Person #1: Hey man, I heard chaosvrgn's about to break the rules, not follow instructions, expose himself to a dangerous situation and just live life with no limits. Again.

Person #2: In other news, water is wet.

That didn't stop ya'll from enjoying my v1 antics. Let's not get pious now.

Nice leap of logic, calling me pious because I made an observation. Even if it worked for you, n=1 doesn't mean shit. All it's going to do is amp others up to run two 5G+ programs simultaneously, possibly ruin their runs, and set a poor precedent for the future. Do it if you want after it's released, but getting special treatment to do something - wait for the piousness - *stupid!* (that's a limit by the way) - is something else.

And yeah, it is interesting to see people line up in anticipation of possibly watching you hurt yourself. Nice.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 07-12-2016

(07-12-2016, 04:36 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 08:28 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 08:21 PM)RTBoss Wrote: I coulda sworn Shannon reiterated no 5G and up are to be used together, period?

Person #1: Hey man, I heard chaosvrgn's about to break the rules, not follow instructions, expose himself to a dangerous situation and just live life with no limits. Again.

Person #2: In other news, water is wet.

That didn't stop ya'll from enjoying my v1 antics. Let's not get pious now.

Nice leap of logic, calling me pious because I made an observation. Even if it worked for you, n=1 doesn't mean shit. All it's going to do is amp others up to run two 5G+ programs simultaneously, possibly ruin their runs, and set a poor precedent for the future. Do it if you want after it's released, but getting special treatment to do something - wait for the piousness - *stupid!* (that's a limit by the way) - is something else.

And yeah, it is interesting to see people line up in anticipation of possibly watching you hurt yourself. Nice.

I have a dope, fat @$$ officer's commission waiting for me in the Air Force reserve if I choose to take it. Rank of Captain, student loan forgiveness, intelligence MOS. It's pretty bad@$$. But... every time I tell someone about I'm considering taking it, they get this sh*t eating grin and say:

"You're gonna get deployed."
To which I reply: "No sh*t, that's the prime function of the military."

P.S. I never asked for "special treatment." Shannon mentioned a few pages back that he's considering releasing it early for people who didn't do v2--

Ohhhhh wait. I know what this is.

If you have a problem with what he's considering, make your arguments to him. Don't try to use me as your whipping boy to get a point across. If he releases it and my date comes through, I'm running it and I'm journaling about it. It's going to happen. It's an inevitability. There's no use in even arguing it with me. Do you argue with the sun for rising in the morning?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Raz - 07-12-2016

Guys, why does it only take some words to get you all worked up? As much as I appreciate all the points of view you roll out when you get going, it needlessly roughs you up and divides you. There are guidelines laid out here to get the most out of the subs, but they do not bind anyone to follow them like they are natural law. Anyone wants to take a sidetrack to check out something? So what? It will alter the intended result, sure. As long as you are aware of it, no problem.

There is no need to reiterate the same flaming discussion over and over again. Live and let live. And curiously observe whatever happens.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Roy - 07-12-2016

Please keep the discussion civilized and relevant.