Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - alphabeta35 - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 02:33 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 02:32 PM)swisston Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 02:13 PM)Shannon Wrote: That is taken care of by the Optimus Engine, which basically says, "Hey, subconscious mind! Everything you know will make me sexier? Let's do that."
Does that require an initial understanding of what makes us sexy though? If I've never felt sexy or desirable before, does my subconscious actually know what to do? Can I educate myself somehow?

It already knows or has access to everything you need to know. Believe it.

hi Shannon,
i tried to search for SM 3.0 in the thread but the system found it too short!! of a term to search for.
i wanted to learn how this new DMSI relates to SM 3.0. i am in the fifth stage of AM 6 and starting the last stage 5 days later (the change is unbelievable, btw.).
i was thinking of purchasing the SM 3.0 set for afterwards, however this new program caught my attention, mostkly because of the new methods you are using in it. i was prepared to purchase the sm 3.0 so, without regards to the price, what should be the next step? is it possible to use DMSI 2.2 along with SM 3.0, maybe one or two loops a day (which the answer will probably be no, but i did not come across with a discussion of this in the 30+ pages i browsed)?
i hope i have not asked a question that was asked before, but did not find anything related in the last 30 or so pages i went back.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 02:44 PM)dissonance Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 02:15 PM)Kurohawk Wrote: Since we are all opening up let me share my first sexual experiance. It was at one of the first parties i've ever went on because i was very shy and did not know how to deal with people but inspite of that i was very alpha in my core i just could not bring it out, after getting drunk i was the center of the party my confidence and humor are unparrareld when im drunk. So one Polish girl got very interisted in me and kept following me around. I was so drunk i just grabbed her and started to make out, then immediatly i took her by the hand to the shower room and we did it there, i was so drunk i kept """" her but could not orgasm. honestly speaking all i remember are 2D memories and its so long ago.
So yeah alcohol did help me lose my v card, then i stopped taking women as seriously as i did before.
Yeah and all my life i thought i had a small d but the next day apperantly she told everyone all the girls at the party what happend and that i have a huge d. So yeah that was it i guess.

Edit: forgot to mention the next day she wanted to do it again but i was so scared i pretended that she is not hot enough for me , she was tho actually


lmao how old were you? and how old are you now?

I was 19 back then , im 21 now!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 03:05 PM)Hercules Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 02:16 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 02:14 PM)Hercules Wrote: Going back to Soul mates I'll elaborate on what Shannon means by twin flames. Twin Flames are 2 halves of soul where one is the masculine polarity and the other is the feminine. It is the exact opposite of you and you won't meet your twin flame without significant spiritual growth.

Hercules, you have to remember that that is one point of view on the matter. Other points of view state that there is no "masculine and feminine" for the soul, because the soul is not a body and does not require gender for reproductive purposes.

According to that point of view, "twin flames" are, depending on who you ask, two fragments of the same original soul, or two souls who were "created to be together".

But we don't have any real way of knowing what or how much of this is accurate.

The Universal law of Gender cannot be broken so anothing in creation must have a Masculine and Feminine polarity.

I would have to disagree, my friend. There are exceptions.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 03:05 PM)alphabeta35 Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 02:33 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 02:32 PM)swisston Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 02:13 PM)Shannon Wrote: That is taken care of by the Optimus Engine, which basically says, "Hey, subconscious mind! Everything you know will make me sexier? Let's do that."
Does that require an initial understanding of what makes us sexy though? If I've never felt sexy or desirable before, does my subconscious actually know what to do? Can I educate myself somehow?

It already knows or has access to everything you need to know. Believe it.

hi Shannon,
i tried to search for SM 3.0 in the thread but the system found it too short!! of a term to search for.
i wanted to learn how this new DMSI relates to SM 3.0. i am in the fifth stage of AM 6 and starting the last stage 5 days later (the change is unbelievable, btw.).
i was thinking of purchasing the SM 3.0 set for afterwards, however this new program caught my attention, mostkly because of the new methods you are using in it. i was prepared to purchase the sm 3.0 so, without regards to the price, what should be the next step? is it possible to use DMSI 2.2 along with SM 3.0, maybe one or two loops a day (which the answer will probably be no, but i did not come across with a discussion of this in the 30+ pages i browsed)?
i hope i have not asked a question that was asked before, but did not find anything related in the last 30 or so pages i went back.

You absolutely cannot use them together. They definitely and very strongly conflict, and they will severely damage each other's programming.

Remember that SM3 is designed specifically to extend the effects of AM6 into a primal, sexual alpha. DMSI is designed to take a person and get them laid.

They both have the goal of getting you laid, and they both use auras, but they have very different ways of getting you there.

SM3 will grow you and make you a better man. DMSI will heal you to the extent that you need healing to express and act out it's program. Otherwise, no growth.

One is trying to make a huge change in you as a being; one is only trying to get you to project sexualized energy and then act on any sexual results.

Which one you pick is up to you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Vincent_Vega - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 01:49 PM)ALI6NMENT Wrote: Muscles is a big one for me, I only strength train because it makes me feel good, which makes me feel more attractive, which makes me feel more confident which attracts certain type of women.

If I decided one-day I don't want to do this no more then what the women found attractive about me in the first place won't be there, so what's the point doing it in the first place.

I want to be my pure basic self and be OK with being that, then no matter where I go or what I do, I always have my self as I am. I won't need a gym, I won't need to eat enough, I won't feel less confident or less attractive, because I am attractive, confident as I am, my pure basic self.

I want to cut out all the added things, that can easily be lost. If I am confident, attractive and OK as I am, I will never need anything outside of myself and to me that is my genuine self.

If you only do something because of external validation, then it's a good idea to get rid of it. But if you like the gym and the feeling after a session, why stop it? Yes, you're more attractive to women, but you don't do it exclusively for them.
And a women won't stay with you for a long time just because you have a good body, so don't worry about her leaving you when you stop training.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - alphabeta35 - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 03:18 PM)Shannon Wrote: You absolutely cannot use them together. They definitely and very strongly conflict, and they will severely damage each other's programming.

Remember that SM3 is designed specifically to extend the effects of AM6 into a primal, sexual alpha. DMSI is designed to take a person and get them laid.

They both have the goal of getting you laid, and they both use auras, but they have very different ways of getting you there.

SM3 will grow you and make you a better man. DMSI will heal you to the extent that you need healing to express and act out it's program. Otherwise, no growth.

One is trying to make a huge change in you as a being; one is only trying to get you to project sexualized energy and then act on any sexual results.

Which one you pick is up to you.

i got my answer, and i wanted to keep in the direction of the AM 6 program. so it is obviously SM 3.0 that i will be going for. having the mindset is more important to me than physicality at this point.
once i am finished with the SM 3.0, i might be asking for your advice for the best way to continue considering the new products that will be available at that time.
now that you have the new generation out, i am sure there will be some interesting tangents to take in the very near future Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 03:13 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 03:05 PM)Hercules Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 02:16 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 02:14 PM)Hercules Wrote: Going back to Soul mates I'll elaborate on what Shannon means by twin flames. Twin Flames are 2 halves of soul where one is the masculine polarity and the other is the feminine. It is the exact opposite of you and you won't meet your twin flame without significant spiritual growth.

Hercules, you have to remember that that is one point of view on the matter. Other points of view state that there is no "masculine and feminine" for the soul, because the soul is not a body and does not require gender for reproductive purposes.

According to that point of view, "twin flames" are, depending on who you ask, two fragments of the same original soul, or two souls who were "created to be together".

But we don't have any real way of knowing what or how much of this is accurate.

The Universal law of Gender cannot be broken so anothing in creation must have a Masculine and Feminine polarity.

I would have to disagree, my friend. There are exceptions.

Any examples??


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 03:46 PM)Hercules Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 03:13 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 03:05 PM)Hercules Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 02:16 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 02:14 PM)Hercules Wrote: Going back to Soul mates I'll elaborate on what Shannon means by twin flames. Twin Flames are 2 halves of soul where one is the masculine polarity and the other is the feminine. It is the exact opposite of you and you won't meet your twin flame without significant spiritual growth.

Hercules, you have to remember that that is one point of view on the matter. Other points of view state that there is no "masculine and feminine" for the soul, because the soul is not a body and does not require gender for reproductive purposes.

According to that point of view, "twin flames" are, depending on who you ask, two fragments of the same original soul, or two souls who were "created to be together".

But we don't have any real way of knowing what or how much of this is accurate.

The Universal law of Gender cannot be broken so anothing in creation must have a Masculine and Feminine polarity.

I would have to disagree, my friend. There are exceptions.

Any examples??

Sure. In one case, there is the perfect balance of the two. in the other case, there is the situation in which they negate each other and form something beyond gender that is both and neither at once.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 03:40 PM)alphabeta35 Wrote:
(07-11-2016, 03:18 PM)Shannon Wrote: You absolutely cannot use them together. They definitely and very strongly conflict, and they will severely damage each other's programming.

Remember that SM3 is designed specifically to extend the effects of AM6 into a primal, sexual alpha. DMSI is designed to take a person and get them laid.

They both have the goal of getting you laid, and they both use auras, but they have very different ways of getting you there.

SM3 will grow you and make you a better man. DMSI will heal you to the extent that you need healing to express and act out it's program. Otherwise, no growth.

One is trying to make a huge change in you as a being; one is only trying to get you to project sexualized energy and then act on any sexual results.

Which one you pick is up to you.

i got my answer, and i wanted to keep in the direction of the AM 6 program. so it is obviously SM 3.0 that i will be going for. having the mindset is more important to me than physicality at this point.
once i am finished with the SM 3.0, i might be asking for your advice for the best way to continue considering the new products that will be available at that time.
now that you have the new generation out, i am sure there will be some interesting tangents to take in the very near future Smile

Most definitely. We are boldly going where no one has gone before!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-11-2016

Alright, we are getting close to finished with the primary audio processing, at which time I will be taking a dinner break and then come back and calculate and implement the ASRB ratio, and then the audio will be ready for encoding. May or may not do encoding, verification, tagging, upload today. ATM, we have three more short steps for the audio processing.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Vincent_Vega - 07-11-2016

@ Shannon: completely different topic: Did you read 'reality transsurfing' by Vadim Zeland? If yes, what do you think about it?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 04:17 PM)Vincent_Vega Wrote: @ Shannon: completely different topic: Did you read 'reality transsurfing' by Vadim Zeland? If yes, what do you think about it?

Have not read that one. Rather highly backlogged on reading lately, with all this new stuff going on. Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 07-11-2016

Shannon,

Are you ever going to build a subliminal of aura/energy/vibe of love, joy & gratitude ? That would be a great sub


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-11-2016

(07-11-2016, 04:39 PM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: Shannon,

Are you ever going to build a subliminal of aura/energy/vibe of love, joy & gratitude ? That would be a great sub

Probably. Make it an endo/exo, and blow the world away.