(07-10-2016, 10:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: The scripting is as done as it needs to be for my purpose of figuring out what is what beyond the two things that have been major issues in 2.1. I need them dealt with before I can see what else it needs done.

By the way, v3 is several months away, not years.

(07-10-2016, 11:03 PM)lokko Wrote: I really hope ASC is the first 6G product.

(07-10-2016, 10:56 PM)CatMan Wrote:

(07-10-2016, 10:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: The scripting is as done as it needs to be for my purpose of figuring out what is what beyond the two things that have been major issues in 2.1. I need them dealt with before I can see what else it needs done.

By the way, v3 is several months away, not years.

This is surprising to hear. I thought V3 would be the 6G version, WAY down the road.

Does this mean V3 will be 5.5G? Or that 6G research is much further along than I thought, and that MSI will be the first 6G in a few months?

(07-10-2016, 11:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: It means that, while I have other things I need to do also, I an fascinated by the potential this program and technology (energy flooding) has. I want to continue to develop it.

Developing anything in 5.5g is developing the 5.5g skeleton script, and advancing it to the 6g skeleton script. But 6g isn't finished being developed itself and I haven't been working on it since I have to get this right.

6g is still looking like late this year or sometime next year. The first 6g program is still most likely going to be ASC.

(07-10-2016, 11:31 PM)CatMan Wrote:

(07-10-2016, 11:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: It means that, while I have other things I need to do also, I an fascinated by the potential this program and technology (energy flooding) has. I want to continue to develop it.

Developing anything in 5.5g is developing the 5.5g skeleton script, and advancing it to the 6g skeleton script. But 6g isn't finished being developed itself and I haven't been working on it since I have to get this right.

6g is still looking like late this year or sometime next year. The first 6g program is still most likely going to be ASC.

Okay, things are as I thought then. That's cool, no worries. This program sounds intriguing, I look forward to using it. ASC 6G, and 6G itself, will be awesome. I figured 2017-2018 for any chance of AM7/SM4 anyway.

So V3 will be in 5.5G, wow. To be a new version series, it must be a substantial update. Seeing as how much is already in there, that's fascinating to me as well.

(07-10-2016, 11:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have a laundry list of updates to make to it and improvements as well including new technologies and new things for it to be doing so it definitely will deserve the version 3.0 upgrade status.

(07-10-2016, 11:51 PM)CatMan Wrote:

(07-10-2016, 11:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have a laundry list of updates to make to it and improvements as well including new technologies and new things for it to be doing so it definitely will deserve the version 3.0 upgrade status.

Haha, I'm already excited for 3.0.

It sounds like it will be worth the purchase for me, 100%. Fantastic.

(07-10-2016, 11:54 PM)Shannon Wrote: I think it would be best if you waited until I do create version 3 before you use it not only for the extra time on E2 but because I'm going to try to make version 3 deals specifically with the sort of reasons why you and guys like you have trouble with women and of course the same thing for women with guys. I think version 3 would be much more effective for you for that reason. I don't know how many months away it's going to be that will depend on how long it takes me to do the other stuff in the meantime and build it of course but I think that's the wisest course of action for you.

(07-11-2016, 12:11 AM)CatMan Wrote:

(07-10-2016, 11:54 PM)Shannon Wrote: I think it would be best if you waited until I do create version 3 before you use it not only for the extra time on E2 but because I'm going to try to make version 3 deals specifically with the sort of reasons why you and guys like you have trouble with women and of course the same thing for women with guys. I think version 3 would be much more effective for you for that reason. I don't know how many months away it's going to be that will depend on how long it takes me to do the other stuff in the meantime and build it of course but I think that's the wisest course of action for you.

Oh?

I purchased this program already before as I promised.

It'd be a shame to not use it. I was thinking that I'd try 2.2 perhaps when it debuts. I've seen some changes in the area of women, and would like a more focused approach to get me making progress. I've had decreased motivation to write in my journal for awhile, and I'm told that's typical of users on this program.

Also, I understand that you have other things on the go, and potentially it can be several months before V3 debuts. And of course, the free upgrades only cover 2.x, so I'd be buying the program twice. Which I'd have no trouble with, as long as I used both. This news of V3 coming soonish is a bit of a surprise. A good one overall of course. I guess it goes to show how well R&D is progressing, which is amazing news for us all.

(07-11-2016, 12:35 AM)Shannon Wrote: That is true, I forgot you bought it already. Alright, then, I'll add that module to 2.2 for you so you can use 2.2 and get the most out of what you paid for.

(07-11-2016, 12:44 AM)CatMan Wrote:

(07-11-2016, 12:35 AM)Shannon Wrote: That is true, I forgot you bought it already. Alright, then, I'll add that module to 2.2 for you so you can use 2.2 and get the most out of what you paid for.

I knew E2 first was best for me as you recommended, so I stuck with it. Regardless of how much I pined for AOSI.

However, I also promised I'd support you by buying AOSI, so I kept my word, knowing full well I wouldn't even be able to use it for awhile.

That really warms my heart, Shannon. Thank you for the extra gesture in return.

One entrepreneur, to another.