Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 07-08-2016

I want medium and hard haha.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-08-2016

(07-08-2016, 08:00 PM)RisingSon Wrote: The models are going absolutely savage. Smile

I, too, feel like my problem has been being too soft as of late. I also wonder how much is nature vs nurture. Fascinating data which reconfirms my own.

Can you clarify what you mean by this?

(07-08-2016, 08:01 PM)FrostedFake Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 07:57 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I'm wondering if AM 6 is making me too "soft".

Lol, if you're worried about that don't run WM.

Don't plan to. Cool


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 07-08-2016

(07-08-2016, 06:54 PM)Shannon Wrote: Then you have your "hard" types, who tend to want extreme treatment from men, and this includes (surprisingly) most teenage girls, porn stars, some randomly encountered "bored housewives" you might meet while shopping, most nude models for A/V modeling, bikini models, some women you would encounter at the beach, some teenage strippers, and some bartendresses. About 20% of virgins, and the ones who are most likely to become pregnant during defloration.

This seems to translate to "Manifest Your Inner Bad Boy 5.5G". The program I've theorised about for awhile, haha. I definitely seem to need that kind of "edge", I admit.

Seriously, the idea of two types of programs, medium and hard sounds intriguing, but maybe there is a way to give very high performance on both, if not optimal in one. Naturally, that's optimal for usage and for building sake. I'm sure you'd like to see the end of development on this program to move on to other issues, and are looking to get it as solid as possible asap to move on.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RisingSon - 07-08-2016

(07-08-2016, 08:46 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 08:00 PM)RisingSon Wrote: The models are going absolutely savage. Smile

I, too, feel like my problem has been being too soft as of late. I also wonder how much is nature vs nurture. Fascinating data which reconfirms my own.

Can you clarify what you mean by this?

Unlike Shannon the models didn't really surprise me that much, but certainly did clarify things. I've spent a lot of time reading and studying current gender issues and such. Why are teenage girls so darn mean? We may never know, but I do know that the teenage girl bullying videos I've seen are usually the most brutal. Just thinking about all the data I've compiled in my head while rummaging through the plights of modern day males and society, is all.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - sawell54 - 07-08-2016

(07-08-2016, 06:54 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 06:35 PM)maxx55 Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 06:21 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 05:54 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 05:50 PM)Shannon Wrote: Having a hard time narrowing the goal scripting down below three options.

Naive question inbound: Can't you just try each of them?

Well, that is an option... I could build all three, and it would cost me at least 72 hours of work to do so. Then I would have three valid products to offer: "Soft", "Medium" and "Hard". (Referring to the women who would respond to each.)

Then I could make them all available in the store, and give a description of what each is good for. Then you could choose for yourself.

But, this would inevitably lead to someone trying to take advantage of the refund policy by trying to "return" one and get another, or "trade in". Not good.

The options I have in response to that are, offer no refund at all, or make it a bundle pack, at triple the cost.

If I offer no refund, then I lose a lot of sales. If I do the triple pack, then someone's going to use it wrong, screw up their results and then ask for a refund.

So... I think I'll pass. You guys will get the single option that works best overall.

Can you describe the different types of women that would respond to each?

If you don't offer all 3 options in the final version, will it at least affect each type of woman?

There are a lot of different types of women I am testing this against, for the guys, and men for the ladies.

The women in particular who respond to Option 1 are generally "Soft" in that they are innocent, gentle, nice, normal, kind, sweet, etc. Generally skittish and relatively inexperienced. About 40% of virgins fall here.

"Medium" is women who are between soft and hard in terms of how they want to be treated. Surprisingly, most strippers in their teens and 20's fall here instead of "hard", while most teenage girls who are not strippers fall into "hard". In fact, unsurprisingly, it seems most women fall here (in medium). Most bartendresses, most waitresses, some teenage girls, most randomly encountered "bored housewives", most women you would encounter at the beach, and about 40% of virgins. This is the option leading the pack so far for successful responses for women.

Then you have your "hard" types, who tend to want extreme treatment from men, and this includes (surprisingly) most teenage girls, porn stars, some randomly encountered "bored housewives" you might meet while shopping, most nude models for A/V modeling, bikini models, some women you would encounter at the beach, some teenage strippers, and some bartendresses. About 20% of virgins, and the ones who are most likely to become pregnant during defloration.

All three will be affected by each option, but each option peaks for the types mentioned as being "most X".

I am lost.. so you are now adjusting the scripting to tweak the aura into attracting different types of women?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-08-2016

(07-08-2016, 08:57 PM)RisingSon Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 08:46 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 08:00 PM)RisingSon Wrote: The models are going absolutely savage. Smile

I, too, feel like my problem has been being too soft as of late. I also wonder how much is nature vs nurture. Fascinating data which reconfirms my own.

Can you clarify what you mean by this?

Unlike Shannon the models didn't really surprise me that much, but certainly did clarify things. I've spent a lot of time reading and studying current gender issues and such. Why are teenage girls so darn mean? We may never know, but I do know that the teenage girl bullying videos I've seen are usually the most brutal. Just thinking about all the data I've compiled in my head while rummaging through the plights of modern day males and society, is all.

It's not so much surprise really, I have been around the block a few times. It's just that it never fails to amaze me the complete dissonance between a woman's conscious and subconscious desires. I have been seeing these results in modeling runs that touch on this for more than 6 years now. Perfect consistency.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-08-2016

(07-08-2016, 09:03 PM)sawell54 Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 06:54 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 06:35 PM)maxx55 Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 06:21 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 05:54 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Naive question inbound: Can't you just try each of them?

Well, that is an option... I could build all three, and it would cost me at least 72 hours of work to do so. Then I would have three valid products to offer: "Soft", "Medium" and "Hard". (Referring to the women who would respond to each.)

Then I could make them all available in the store, and give a description of what each is good for. Then you could choose for yourself.

But, this would inevitably lead to someone trying to take advantage of the refund policy by trying to "return" one and get another, or "trade in". Not good.

The options I have in response to that are, offer no refund at all, or make it a bundle pack, at triple the cost.

If I offer no refund, then I lose a lot of sales. If I do the triple pack, then someone's going to use it wrong, screw up their results and then ask for a refund.

So... I think I'll pass. You guys will get the single option that works best overall.

Can you describe the different types of women that would respond to each?

If you don't offer all 3 options in the final version, will it at least affect each type of woman?

There are a lot of different types of women I am testing this against, for the guys, and men for the ladies.

The women in particular who respond to Option 1 are generally "Soft" in that they are innocent, gentle, nice, normal, kind, sweet, etc. Generally skittish and relatively inexperienced. About 40% of virgins fall here.

"Medium" is women who are between soft and hard in terms of how they want to be treated. Surprisingly, most strippers in their teens and 20's fall here instead of "hard", while most teenage girls who are not strippers fall into "hard". In fact, unsurprisingly, it seems most women fall here (in medium). Most bartendresses, most waitresses, some teenage girls, most randomly encountered "bored housewives", most women you would encounter at the beach, and about 40% of virgins. This is the option leading the pack so far for successful responses for women.

Then you have your "hard" types, who tend to want extreme treatment from men, and this includes (surprisingly) most teenage girls, porn stars, some randomly encountered "bored housewives" you might meet while shopping, most nude models for A/V modeling, bikini models, some women you would encounter at the beach, some teenage strippers, and some bartendresses. About 20% of virgins, and the ones who are most likely to become pregnant during defloration.

All three will be affected by each option, but each option peaks for the types mentioned as being "most X".

I am lost.. so you are now adjusting the scripting to tweak the aura into attracting different types of women?

I am modeling several options for what type of people the program aims to attract sexually. We are looking for one option that attracts the most of the best of them for the most possible users.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 07-08-2016

(07-08-2016, 08:57 PM)RisingSon Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 08:46 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 08:00 PM)RisingSon Wrote: The models are going absolutely savage. Smile

I, too, feel like my problem has been being too soft as of late. I also wonder how much is nature vs nurture. Fascinating data which reconfirms my own.

Can you clarify what you mean by this?

Unlike Shannon the models didn't really surprise me that much, but certainly did clarify things. I've spent a lot of time reading and studying current gender issues and such. Why are teenage girls so darn mean? We may never know, but I do know that the teenage girl bullying videos I've seen are usually the most brutal. Just thinking about all the data I've compiled in my head while rummaging through the plights of modern day males and society, is all.

I have to agree with you. I'm surprised Shannon was surprised to be honest, lol.

Teenage girls have been addicted to loser bad boys, or "extreme treatment", for as long as I've known and beyond. No surprise to me at all, it's as clear as day to me my whole life. It's mystified me about WHY often, but I can't deny the reality of it playing out constantly. I also agree with how petty and superficial etc. they can be.

"Hard" seems to be the best version to choose for me, seeing as I'm around mostly young women that would seem to respond best to it. Maybe Shannon will make an all rounder program that will work well in all situations. Or, two versions so we can really hone in on what we want. I almost want two versions, so I can really get the "edge" I feel I've needed all my life. I have the trust/comfort stuff already, but the sexual attraction has been my handicap, and I guess women have viewed me as "too nice", "boring", "no edge", what have you. "Hard" would no doubt fix that right quick! Seems like exactly what I've always wanted, "Manifest Your Inner Bad Boy 5.5G", lol!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RisingSon - 07-08-2016

Shannon is indeed the master of models... Here's something I just saw posted on another board I visit.

[Image: 1468041309376.jpg]


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-08-2016

(07-08-2016, 09:21 PM)CatMan Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 08:57 PM)RisingSon Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 08:46 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 08:00 PM)RisingSon Wrote: The models are going absolutely savage. Smile

I, too, feel like my problem has been being too soft as of late. I also wonder how much is nature vs nurture. Fascinating data which reconfirms my own.

Can you clarify what you mean by this?

Unlike Shannon the models didn't really surprise me that much, but certainly did clarify things. I've spent a lot of time reading and studying current gender issues and such. Why are teenage girls so darn mean? We may never know, but I do know that the teenage girl bullying videos I've seen are usually the most brutal. Just thinking about all the data I've compiled in my head while rummaging through the plights of modern day males and society, is all.

I have to agree with you. I'm surprised Shannon was surprised to be honest, lol.

Teenage girls have been addicted to loser bad boys, or "extreme treatment", for as long as I've known and beyond. No surprise to me at all, it's as clear as day to me my whole life. It's mystified me about WHY often, but I can't deny the reality of it playing out constantly. I also agree with how petty and superficial etc. they can be.

"Hard" seems to be the best version to choose for me, seeing as I'm around mostly young women that would seem to respond best to it. Maybe Shannon will make an all rounder program that will work well in all situations. Or, two versions so we can really hone in on what we want. I almost want two versions, so I can really get the "edge" I feel I've needed all my life. I have the trust/comfort stuff already, but the sexual attraction has been my handicap, and I guess women have viewed me as "too nice", "boring", "no edge", what have you. "Hard" would no doubt fix that right quick! Seems like exactly what I've always wanted, "Manifest Your Inner Bad Boy 5.5G", lol!

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-post-120063.html#pid120063

I'm trying to tune "Medium" to be the best all-rounder, since it wins the bell curve test.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RisingSon - 07-08-2016

Another note: A lot of this ties in, especially having a 'hungry' attitude or outlook on life. When we are hungry, our body is producing a hormone called "Ghrelin" which has some interesting effects. For that reason, I don't mind being ravenous like AOSI V1 stimulated in some testers!

Quote:Aside from increase GH levels–which can lead to muscle gain and fat loss–Ghrelin has numerous other benefits. For example, studies have shown that Ghrelin can have positive effects on learning and memory, and that learning may be best during the day when Ghrelin levels are high². Another potential benefit of Ghrelin is its ability to defend against symptoms related to anxiety/depression brought on by high levels of stress³.



RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-08-2016

(07-08-2016, 09:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 09:21 PM)CatMan Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 08:57 PM)RisingSon Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 08:46 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 08:00 PM)RisingSon Wrote: The models are going absolutely savage. Smile

I, too, feel like my problem has been being too soft as of late. I also wonder how much is nature vs nurture. Fascinating data which reconfirms my own.

Can you clarify what you mean by this?

Unlike Shannon the models didn't really surprise me that much, but certainly did clarify things. I've spent a lot of time reading and studying current gender issues and such. Why are teenage girls so darn mean? We may never know, but I do know that the teenage girl bullying videos I've seen are usually the most brutal. Just thinking about all the data I've compiled in my head while rummaging through the plights of modern day males and society, is all.

I have to agree with you. I'm surprised Shannon was surprised to be honest, lol.

Teenage girls have been addicted to loser bad boys, or "extreme treatment", for as long as I've known and beyond. No surprise to me at all, it's as clear as day to me my whole life. It's mystified me about WHY often, but I can't deny the reality of it playing out constantly. I also agree with how petty and superficial etc. they can be.

"Hard" seems to be the best version to choose for me, seeing as I'm around mostly young women that would seem to respond best to it. Maybe Shannon will make an all rounder program that will work well in all situations. Or, two versions so we can really hone in on what we want. I almost want two versions, so I can really get the "edge" I feel I've needed all my life. I have the trust/comfort stuff already, but the sexual attraction has been my handicap, and I guess women have viewed me as "too nice", "boring", "no edge", what have you. "Hard" would no doubt fix that right quick! Seems like exactly what I've always wanted, "Manifest Your Inner Bad Boy 5.5G", lol!

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-post-120063.html#pid120063

I'm trying to tune "Medium" to be the best all-rounder, since it wins the bell curve test.

That's too bad. I'd ask you to reconsider simply because if you make all your programs target the widest range, you will lose potency, but they're your subs, and I'm sure you've considered that.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-08-2016

(07-08-2016, 09:50 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 09:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 09:21 PM)CatMan Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 08:57 PM)RisingSon Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 08:46 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Can you clarify what you mean by this?

Unlike Shannon the models didn't really surprise me that much, but certainly did clarify things. I've spent a lot of time reading and studying current gender issues and such. Why are teenage girls so darn mean? We may never know, but I do know that the teenage girl bullying videos I've seen are usually the most brutal. Just thinking about all the data I've compiled in my head while rummaging through the plights of modern day males and society, is all.

I have to agree with you. I'm surprised Shannon was surprised to be honest, lol.

Teenage girls have been addicted to loser bad boys, or "extreme treatment", for as long as I've known and beyond. No surprise to me at all, it's as clear as day to me my whole life. It's mystified me about WHY often, but I can't deny the reality of it playing out constantly. I also agree with how petty and superficial etc. they can be.

"Hard" seems to be the best version to choose for me, seeing as I'm around mostly young women that would seem to respond best to it. Maybe Shannon will make an all rounder program that will work well in all situations. Or, two versions so we can really hone in on what we want. I almost want two versions, so I can really get the "edge" I feel I've needed all my life. I have the trust/comfort stuff already, but the sexual attraction has been my handicap, and I guess women have viewed me as "too nice", "boring", "no edge", what have you. "Hard" would no doubt fix that right quick! Seems like exactly what I've always wanted, "Manifest Your Inner Bad Boy 5.5G", lol!

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-post-120063.html#pid120063

I'm trying to tune "Medium" to be the best all-rounder, since it wins the bell curve test.

That's too bad. I'd ask you to reconsider simply because if you make all your programs target the widest range, you will lose potency, but they're your subs, and I'm sure you've considered that.

Wait. Let me get this straight.

If I make all my customers happy, I will be producing inferior products?

I don't think you understand what I'm doing here. It doesn't "lose potency" to pick the phrasing that produces the most happy customers.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-08-2016

(07-08-2016, 09:53 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 09:50 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 09:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 09:21 PM)CatMan Wrote:
(07-08-2016, 08:57 PM)RisingSon Wrote: Unlike Shannon the models didn't really surprise me that much, but certainly did clarify things. I've spent a lot of time reading and studying current gender issues and such. Why are teenage girls so darn mean? We may never know, but I do know that the teenage girl bullying videos I've seen are usually the most brutal. Just thinking about all the data I've compiled in my head while rummaging through the plights of modern day males and society, is all.

I have to agree with you. I'm surprised Shannon was surprised to be honest, lol.

Teenage girls have been addicted to loser bad boys, or "extreme treatment", for as long as I've known and beyond. No surprise to me at all, it's as clear as day to me my whole life. It's mystified me about WHY often, but I can't deny the reality of it playing out constantly. I also agree with how petty and superficial etc. they can be.

"Hard" seems to be the best version to choose for me, seeing as I'm around mostly young women that would seem to respond best to it. Maybe Shannon will make an all rounder program that will work well in all situations. Or, two versions so we can really hone in on what we want. I almost want two versions, so I can really get the "edge" I feel I've needed all my life. I have the trust/comfort stuff already, but the sexual attraction has been my handicap, and I guess women have viewed me as "too nice", "boring", "no edge", what have you. "Hard" would no doubt fix that right quick! Seems like exactly what I've always wanted, "Manifest Your Inner Bad Boy 5.5G", lol!

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-post-120063.html#pid120063

I'm trying to tune "Medium" to be the best all-rounder, since it wins the bell curve test.

That's too bad. I'd ask you to reconsider simply because if you make all your programs target the widest range, you will lose potency, but they're your subs, and I'm sure you've considered that.

Wait. Let me get this straight.

If I make all my customers happy, I will be producing inferior products?

I don't think you understand what I'm doing here. It doesn't "lose potency" to pick the phrasing that produces the most happy customers.

Yeah I probably don't. I'm thinking of the "if you try to please everybody, you end up pleasing nobody" principle. If that's not how it works with subs, then fair enough, my bad.