Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-04-2016

(07-04-2016, 06:17 AM)Vincent_Vega Wrote:
(07-04-2016, 05:22 AM)bogdy Wrote: Aosi 2.1 + mones? Any1 tried them?

Try it yourself.

Please don't. You can't know which is doing what if you do that. We are testing DMSI right now.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-04-2016

(07-04-2016, 09:18 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: I just purchased DSMI but it says the status is on hold, how long is it going to be on hold ?

It depends on various factors. What country are you in? Are you using a credit card through paypal?

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 07-04-2016

Hye Fella... its ALREADY in da worx and no doubt will be further developed in the coming week and months.... take a look at whats IN E2(EPRHA).. its got 3 FULL PROGRAMS included in it, Positive thinking ,Positive Attitude,Over Come the Victim mentality,Over Guilt Shame and Fear,as well as parts of/tweaked version of overcome negativity within and without,externalizing them ect and goodness know what else is in the mix as well... IM on E2 since May 23 the day AFTER my B-day.
its amazing and even that hasnt gotten all the bells and whistle it one day will ! incredible.
all the best on your journey. salute!! on this day of da 4th !!

(07-03-2016, 08:04 PM)Shannon Wrote: This stuff is too new yet. I don't know.

That said, I do know that even just 2 days at 1 hour a day per week is slowly but surely producing increasing impact and results on my 6G testers from week to week.

5.5G and 6G are not even close in terms of levels of power yet. There's a lot left from 6G that I have to develop, define and transfer over.

I suspect... let me say that again, since some of you see to have relatively low reading comprehension... I suspect that 3 months of 6G daily will have a very long term or permanent impact on a person.

There's a lot more to learn.

That brings up an interesting point. If the 5.5 and 6G technology proves out, and requires fewer overall hours per day to achieve long-term success...

The logical next step would be to develop a way to work on multiple fronts at the same time.

Right now, the instructions specifically state that only one program [greater than or equal to] 5G should be used at one time. However, if we can get solid gains on 3-ish hours per day, then it would be a win/win (business and self-development) to find a way to use 2 or 3 at a time.

EDIT

The trick, I suppose, would be figuring out WHICH programs would naturally complement each other.
[/quote]

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-04-2016

I have been modeling a few options for the goal for V2.2 today and according to the models, the things you guys think you want, you don't really want. That means there's some unaccounted for variable that we haven't thought of that would throw it off, just like it has apparently thrown off V2.1's "people I am sexually attracted to" goal. I do have something that looks promising, though, and when I have more time I will continue looking for better goal phrasing.

Just got back from an experiment. Today I had my girlfriend expose herself, and I exposed myself. One loop.

Then we went to eat at Applebee's restaurant. Here's what I noticed.

* Our server from our previous visit there tried to serve us, even though she wasn't our server.
* Our server from this visit changed her reaction to us noticeably during the course of her time serving us, to much more friendly and open.
* A table sitting behind me had two Hispanic women, and heir boyfriends. Even though they were sitting behind us, I observed the females displaying signs of increased sexual arousal (shifting around in the seat, directional positioning that lined up with me but made no real sense otherwise, wagging legs) and their boyfriends became increasingly attentive, protective and focused on me.
* As we were leaving, we had two odd things happen:
1. We had a guy sitting in a different dining room entirely, who could not have seen us at all while we were there, get our attention by knocking on the glass and waving to us (her?) as we walked past. Neither of us had ever seen him before in our lives. Never before has this happened.
2. As we approached my car, a random guy sitting in his truck with the windows down looked at us (her?) and exclaimed, "Wow that is hot!" and motioned to his steering wheel. He was three cars down.

My girlfriend noted that she is exceptionally wet and sexually aroused.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-04-2016

(07-04-2016, 02:09 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have been modeling a few options for the goal for V2.2 today and according to the models, the things you guys think you want, you don't really want. That means there's some unaccounted for variable that we haven't thought of that would throw it off, just like it has apparently thrown off V2.1's "people I am sexually attracted to" goal. I do have something that looks promising, though, and when I have more time I will continue looking for better goal phrasing.

Interesting Shannon. The question then is will you make a version that gives us what we think we want, or will you give us a version that gives us what we "really want".

I vote for the former, tbh.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Vincent_Vega - 07-04-2016

(07-04-2016, 02:22 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(07-04-2016, 02:09 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have been modeling a few options for the goal for V2.2 today and according to the models, the things you guys think you want, you don't really want. That means there's some unaccounted for variable that we haven't thought of that would throw it off, just like it has apparently thrown off V2.1's "people I am sexually attracted to" goal. I do have something that looks promising, though, and when I have more time I will continue looking for better goal phrasing.

Interesting Shannon. The question then is will you make a version that gives us what we think we want, or will you give us a version that gives us what we "really want".

I vote for the former, tbh.

So does that mean that the goal phrasing of v2.1 doesn't work?

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-04-2016

It means it's not optimal. We don't know how well it works. An optimal goal will produce desired results for the majority of people the majority of the time.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-04-2016

(07-04-2016, 02:22 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(07-04-2016, 02:09 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have been modeling a few options for the goal for V2.2 today and according to the models, the things you guys think you want, you don't really want. That means there's some unaccounted for variable that we haven't thought of that would throw it off, just like it has apparently thrown off V2.1's "people I am sexually attracted to" goal. I do have something that looks promising, though, and when I have more time I will continue looking for better goal phrasing.

Interesting Shannon. The question then is will you make a version that gives us what we think we want, or will you give us a version that gives us what we "really want".

I vote for the former, tbh.

I am going to produce whatever the models tell me will result in the overall most number of customers who are happy with the product.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AriGold - 07-04-2016

Is there a timeframe for when to Manifest Your Perfect series will be updated for romantic lover/girlfriend/wife/boyfriend/husband? Like is it this year or not really in the near future?

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-04-2016

(07-04-2016, 02:33 PM)AriGold Wrote: Is there a timeframe for when to Manifest Your Perfect series will be updated for romantic lover/girlfriend/wife/boyfriend/husband? Like is it this year or not really in the near future?

No idea right now. I still have to figure out active manifestation scripting fully.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 07-04-2016

Hey Shannon, I haven't been here in moths but I'd like to ask you a question. You said that the US government would open to subliminals but they have been doing this since the 50s through MK ultra through trauma based mind control to create super soldiers (See Bucky Barnes in captain America Civil War) and seduction based mind control through the KGB. I'm sure the government has way advanced subs due to the billions spent on these projects. So why don't you think the govt isn't interested in these things.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 07-04-2016

(07-04-2016, 09:51 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-04-2016, 09:18 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: I just purchased DSMI but it says the status is on hold, how long is it going to be on hold ?

It depends on various factors. What country are you in? Are you using a credit card through paypal?

I am in canada and I used a credit card through paypal. Man, I want to use DMSI as quickly as possible. I hope it's not on hold for days, that would just be plain annoying.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 07-04-2016

So Shannon, can you tell us what it is that we think we want from MSI and also what we really want from it?

All I expect from it, is to achieve maximum sexiosity and for all girls who come in contact with me to know how sexy I am and for the ones I find attractive to very obviously and clearly act on it. Sometimes I'm attracted to a girl and later feel sexually attracted to her, sometimes I'm immediately sexually attracted to her. So if it makes all the girls I just find attractive to be obvious and blatant towards me, its cover everything.

RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AlphaRomeo - 07-04-2016

(07-04-2016, 03:05 PM)Hercules Wrote: Hey Shannon, I haven't been here in moths but I'd like to ask you a question. You said that the US government would open to subliminals but they have been doing this since the 50s through MK ultra through trauma based mind control to create super soldiers (See Bucky Barnes in captain America Civil War) and seduction based mind control through the KGB. I'm sure the government has way advanced subs due to the billions spent on these projects. So why don't you think the govt isn't interested in these things.

Why are you asking, Hercules?
I surely hope, for the love of everything that is good in this world, that the goverment will NEVER be interested in Shannnon´s subs. The moment they (hopefully not) become interested would be the moment we can all bet our family jewels that it will be all downhill from there. They are like Anti-Mida´s, turning everything that is gold into a s**t.