Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-25-2016

I'm not going to give my testers placebo effects with expectations. Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 06-25-2016

(06-25-2016, 08:10 PM)Shannon Wrote: I'm not going to give my testers placebo effects with expectations. Smile
Big GrinBig Grin
Shannon may you recommend a smartphone suited for ultrasonic? I'm thinking about HTC since it has stereo speakers, but I don't know if it passes the 20 kz test.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-25-2016

(06-25-2016, 08:31 PM)bogdy Wrote:
(06-25-2016, 08:10 PM)Shannon Wrote: I'm not going to give my testers placebo effects with expectations. Smile
Big GrinBig Grin
Shannon may you recommend a smartphone suited for ultrasonic? I'm thinking about HTC since it has stereo speakers, but I don't know if it passes the 20 kz test.

I have been using the Samsung Galaxy series ever since the S2. All of them except the S5, in fact. I happen to know that all of them, 2 through 7, work. But I have no experience with anything else except one low end LG, can't remember the model. All were okay.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 06-25-2016

(06-25-2016, 08:31 PM)bogdy Wrote: Shannon may you recommend a smartphone suited for ultrasonic? I'm thinking about HTC since it has stereo speakers, but I don't know if it passes the 20 kz test.

I don't know about others but I play the silent track from my phone through cheap Logitech computer speakers. It's worked perfectly for LTU, BASE and now for E 2.0

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000R9AAJA/

I only mention these speakers specifically because I've been using them for over a year now and they've done the job for the lowest $$$ I could find (got them for $10 on sale Big Grin)


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Minititan - 06-26-2016

Sincerely praying that this is released to testers before Friday. Friday is a massive local event and people from other towns all flood here for the day, busiest day of the year and I'm keen to see the power of DAOSI when surrounded by hundreds of babes.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-26-2016

I was planning to either release it or rework it on the 30th, which is Thursday.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-26-2016

I am starting to get an idea what the optimal usage pattern is in terms of loops per day for DAOSI V2. It seems to consistently show as being between 4 and 8 loops per day, with 4 and 6 being the top picks, and 6 winning more often than anything else. Surprisingly, 1 loop is also showing very well.

9 loops and up consistently shows as being dangerous and problematic so far. Apparently overpowering the aura will result in undesirable reactions from others.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 06-26-2016

(06-26-2016, 12:34 AM)Shannon Wrote: I was planning to either release it or rework it on the 30th, which is Thursday.

That's so perfect, as I'm sure all of us will be having a big weekend next week. Smile Hopefully the trials go well!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 06-26-2016

In Psychic Sexuality (book), he says the "full male regalia", meaning very high sexual energy, is often rejected by the female. It seems a kind of middle ground level of sexual energy is preferable.

I thought the sub could automatically alter your level of sexual energy to adapt to what the person you're trying to attract would require from you?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-26-2016

(06-26-2016, 01:06 AM)kenpachi Wrote: In Psychic Sexuality (book), he says the "full male regalia", meaning very high sexual energy, is often rejected by the female. It seems a kind of middle ground level of sexual energy is preferable.

I thought the sub could automatically alter your level of sexual energy to adapt to what the person you're trying to attract would require from you?

It automatically alters the aura to account for the specific amount and type of energy required by each person being affected. And this feature works well, if today's second observation is any indication. I was sitting in a restaurant surrounded by seven different women, and every single one of them was responding in ways that were obvious, except of course the one sitting behind me who I could not watch.

These females ranged in age from early 20's to late 50's, and included a range of different nationalities, including American, Japanese, Chinese and Philippine.

Yet they all responded in extremely similar ways, and they all responded at almost exactly the same rates of timing!

It would be very hard for me to believe that seven different females from such diverse backgrounds and ages would all give virtually identical conscious and subconscious reactions, and in identical timing, to just one single stimulus. I have been doing experiments with groups of people for years that show that it virtually never happens if they are all exposed to a single subliminal. But this is not a subliminal; this is an energy field, which is designed to adjust to the individual to become what they need it to be to achieve the goal of sexual arousal and attraction.

I can only explain what I saw in the second observation with, "It works." on that point.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Weichi - 06-26-2016

(06-26-2016, 01:17 AM)Shannon Wrote: Yet they all responded in extremely similar ways, and they all responded at almost exactly the same rates of timing!

Speaking of timing ... can you give us an timeframe in which this aura start affecting people in our vicinity?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Raz - 06-26-2016

(06-25-2016, 04:52 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(06-25-2016, 07:56 AM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: Ive seen a few times while I was researching MLS that quite a few users were dissatisfied with the 5G version. What specifically is wrong with it? When will it be fixed or upgraded? I'd assume it takes priority if it really is "broken."

The 5G version of what?

EDIT: I misread that, I thought it said IML instead of MLS. Gotcha.

It's going to be high priority, but not top priority. I have a few things that I need to do first. But we'll fix it.

I'd like to contribute my two cents to this. MLS 5G did not do much for me while I tried it. The MLS module in BASE 2.1 on the other hand is working quite well for me.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 06-26-2016

(06-26-2016, 12:34 AM)Shannon Wrote: I was planning to either release it or rework it on the 30th, which is Thursday.

This wait is going to be a bit harder than I thought. I'm going to have to start planning activities for the entire week just to help speed up the passage of time!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 06-26-2016

Hope I'll have my credit card before next thursday so I can have DAOSI V2 for testing.