Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - lokko - 06-25-2016

I want v2 for us alreadyyy


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 06-25-2016

Chakras aren't allegorical, they're just rather haphazard and you can create your own so it's not an exact system when dealing with higher than base functions. The Hindu system seems to be very poetic and breadcrumbs than the Chinese alchemical system. And kundalini is actually my main concern when it comes to these subs. I want the benefits (Shannon's subliminals are very effective and detailed) but I don't want to trigger kundalini if possible.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RisingSon - 06-25-2016

(06-25-2016, 07:11 AM)Nox Wrote: Chakras aren't allegorical, they're just rather haphazard and you can create your own so it's not an exact system when dealing with higher than base functions. The Hindu system seems to be very poetic and breadcrumbs than the Chinese alchemical system. And kundalini is actually my main concern when it comes to these subs. I want the benefits (Shannon's subliminals are very effective and detailed) but I don't want to trigger kundalini if possible.

You seem a little conflicted. That's a personal problem.

Some of us have the inverse goal in mind. If you are scared of your kundalini then don't embrace your sexuality fully and stop all meditation or choose a slow route of cultivation like Tai Chi. Surely, don't listen to THE KING/QUEEN OF ALL SEX SUBS, DAOSI V@!!! Hehe...

Sort of curious how the @ symbol could appear as a coiled serpent...

Really, most people don't have the right intent, knowledge, or level of purification when coming at Kundalini so when it erupts with negative side effects to a person's mental/physical health or whatever due to repression, blockages, and disease the spiritually inept are quick to cast blame and create fear. Actual Kundalini experiences are quite rare, by the way. I've observed that the real ones require a person to have significant spiritual protection and it greatly alters perception of this reality FOREVER. Seek truth and the rest will come naturally at it's own pace.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 06-25-2016

(06-25-2016, 06:47 AM)jacksonchandra Wrote: DAOSI I think It plays the sacral, solar plexus and third eye chakra. Third eye chakra doesn't overall mean only in spiritual things. One of the third eye chakra aspect that governs our life flow is how we "see" the world. We create our world by our thoughts. If we see the world as label as beautiful, it is what you will create. And so the opposite. And our belief is in the third eye chakra. With subconscious reprogramming, we "refresh" and "replace" with the new one, and our life circumstance also change.

Hey Sarge...

This is "as above, so below" being expressed through the lens of a different mental / spiritual discipline. You'll find it in almost every belief system.

Wink


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 06-25-2016

(06-25-2016, 07:34 AM)RisingSon Wrote:
(06-25-2016, 07:11 AM)Nox Wrote: Chakras aren't allegorical, they're just rather haphazard and you can create your own so it's not an exact system when dealing with higher than base functions. The Hindu system seems to be very poetic and breadcrumbs than the Chinese alchemical system. And kundalini is actually my main concern when it comes to these subs. I want the benefits (Shannon's subliminals are very effective and detailed) but I don't want to trigger kundalini if possible.

You seem a little conflicted. That's a personal problem.

Some of us have the inverse goal in mind. If you are scared of your kundalini then don't embrace your sexuality fully and stop all meditation or choose a slow route of cultivation like Tai Chi. Surely, don't listen to THE KING/QUEEN OF ALL SEX SUBS, DAOSI V@!!! Hehe...

Sort of curious how the @ symbol could appear as a coiled serpent...

Really, most people don't have the right intent, knowledge, or level of purification when coming at Kundalini so when it erupts with negative side effects to a person's mental/physical health or whatever due to repression, blockages, and disease the spiritually inept are quick to cast blame and create fear. Actual Kundalini experiences are quite rare, by the way. I've observed that the real ones require a person to have significant spiritual protection and it greatly alters perception of this reality FOREVER. Seek truth and the rest will come naturally at it's own pace.

Kundalini isn't what you think it is. But you're correct that true kundalini experiences are rare.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bookstacks DC737 - 06-25-2016

Ive seen a few times while I was researching MLS that quite a few users were dissatisfied with the 5G version. What specifically is wrong with it? When will it be fixed or upgraded? I'd assume it takes priority if it really is "broken."


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Natious - 06-25-2016

BAMM 6g, I wonder how much that's gonna cost. 25 large? Take's a millionaire?

Another thing I was thinking about is that the following years might be a huge leap in evolution (don't know if I expressed my idea properly). Awesome to be alive at such a time.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 06-25-2016

(06-25-2016, 07:47 AM)Nox Wrote:
(06-25-2016, 07:34 AM)RisingSon Wrote:
(06-25-2016, 07:11 AM)Nox Wrote: Chakras aren't allegorical, they're just rather haphazard and you can create your own so it's not an exact system when dealing with higher than base functions. The Hindu system seems to be very poetic and breadcrumbs than the Chinese alchemical system. And kundalini is actually my main concern when it comes to these subs. I want the benefits (Shannon's subliminals are very effective and detailed) but I don't want to trigger kundalini if possible.

You seem a little conflicted. That's a personal problem.

Some of us have the inverse goal in mind. If you are scared of your kundalini then don't embrace your sexuality fully and stop all meditation or choose a slow route of cultivation like Tai Chi. Surely, don't listen to THE KING/QUEEN OF ALL SEX SUBS, DAOSI V@!!! Hehe...

Sort of curious how the @ symbol could appear as a coiled serpent...

Really, most people don't have the right intent, knowledge, or level of purification when coming at Kundalini so when it erupts with negative side effects to a person's mental/physical health or whatever due to repression, blockages, and disease the spiritually inept are quick to cast blame and create fear. Actual Kundalini experiences are quite rare, by the way. I've observed that the real ones require a person to have significant spiritual protection and it greatly alters perception of this reality FOREVER. Seek truth and the rest will come naturally at it's own pace.

Kundalini isn't what you think it is. But you're correct that true kundalini experiences are rare.

Can you explain what kundalini is?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 06-25-2016

(06-25-2016, 09:01 AM)bogdy Wrote:
(06-25-2016, 07:47 AM)Nox Wrote:
(06-25-2016, 07:34 AM)RisingSon Wrote:
(06-25-2016, 07:11 AM)Nox Wrote: Chakras aren't allegorical, they're just rather haphazard and you can create your own so it's not an exact system when dealing with higher than base functions. The Hindu system seems to be very poetic and breadcrumbs than the Chinese alchemical system. And kundalini is actually my main concern when it comes to these subs. I want the benefits (Shannon's subliminals are very effective and detailed) but I don't want to trigger kundalini if possible.

You seem a little conflicted. That's a personal problem.

Some of us have the inverse goal in mind. If you are scared of your kundalini then don't embrace your sexuality fully and stop all meditation or choose a slow route of cultivation like Tai Chi. Surely, don't listen to THE KING/QUEEN OF ALL SEX SUBS, DAOSI V@!!! Hehe...

Sort of curious how the @ symbol could appear as a coiled serpent...

Really, most people don't have the right intent, knowledge, or level of purification when coming at Kundalini so when it erupts with negative side effects to a person's mental/physical health or whatever due to repression, blockages, and disease the spiritually inept are quick to cast blame and create fear. Actual Kundalini experiences are quite rare, by the way. I've observed that the real ones require a person to have significant spiritual protection and it greatly alters perception of this reality FOREVER. Seek truth and the rest will come naturally at it's own pace.

Kundalini isn't what you think it is. But you're correct that true kundalini experiences are rare.

Can you explain what kundalini is?

That's actually a super deep question, and can get very personal and weird honestly. More than happy to answer questions in pms, but know that it will be a rule 4 violation in advance


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - waahbeta - 06-25-2016

Considering the achievements in 5.5G. I'd seriously like an update to SSF. I've used ssf fir over 6 months with no improvement. Just bought the Ephra 2, and I can feel the effects like mindfulness I. E recognizing negative thought as soon as they appear n removing them and sexual Dreams


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-25-2016

(06-25-2016, 04:38 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(06-24-2016, 09:37 PM)Shannon Wrote: A long time ago, I started trying to develop a computerized predictive model for helping me figure things out faster. Instead, for example, of trying 30 million variations of something, it helps me narrow down my efforts by showing me what will probably happen if I use each option.

Over time it's gotten more and more complex and refined. Now it consists of three models that are all using slightly different algorithms, which all have merit and are accurate. But when two or more of them agree within about 5%, or three of them all agree within about 10%, I know they are around 85% likely to be correct.

When I run various questions that are related through my models, they show me with a very high degree of accuracy what is most likely, because the effect is that one can't be right of the other three disagree. It ends up being a little bit like how the oil companies used to map out oil deposits by drilling a series of cores and then building a computer model from them.

The original model was based loosely on the idea of weather modeling. Over time, I have refined it and it is more and more becoming something that has very little relation to anything else I know about. Basically takes into account a lot of data and then manipulates that data in special ways to arrive at an answer which it outputs.

I'm going to have to rewrite the models again soon, have been lazy about that. Current models need to be refined for more speed and ease of use.

But when I say models, that's what I am talking about.

Do you use some known algorithms as foundation? Or maybe neural networks? And where do you get data for things like meeting a certain person? Just curious.

I use algorithms I developed myself. Beyond that, I'm keeping it a secret. Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-25-2016

(06-25-2016, 05:19 AM)Nox Wrote:
(06-25-2016, 01:24 AM)Shannon Wrote: The "powering up" process for this one is very interesting. First, it seems to play teasingly with and flicker on and off superficially on my face and chest. Then it settled "on" my lungs. Then it entered my lungs, and then filled them and my upper abdomen. Next, I felt hints of energy in my breath, but it's not very obvious unless you're really paying attention and looking for it. Then I started feeling it going down into my root chakra and after that it's overflowed my chest into my face and head.

After a little over an hour and 5 minutes, it seems to be gaining power in my chest. Heart chakra is definitely still powering up. It's the sort of lightness that you could easily ignore though, if you were distracted.

Exactly what I would expect from the specified energy sources.

So it's designed to work with root chakra / huiyin area? Well that's concerning for me, but pretty cool for you guys it sounds like. Smile

It's designed to work with energies, not areas. Your subconscious decides which energies best fit the bill, and how to manipulate them to achieve the program goal safely.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-25-2016

(06-25-2016, 05:45 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(06-25-2016, 03:14 AM)Shannon Wrote: I'm not going to go into details as to how the first test went aside from to say that. I am pleased with what happened.

Argh, you tease. Ben, I hope you're more forthcoming with the details. Tongue

I can't wait to see how this ramps up over the week. How many loops are you planning to run daily? Did you ask testers to run a specific number of loops, or is it up to them?

Ben's not talking. Not without my say so. We need a little more time yet.

Still determining loops to use.

So far only one at a time.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-25-2016

(06-25-2016, 07:56 AM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: Ive seen a few times while I was researching MLS that quite a few users were dissatisfied with the 5G version. What specifically is wrong with it? When will it be fixed or upgraded? I'd assume it takes priority if it really is "broken."

The 5G version of what?

EDIT: I misread that, I thought it said IML instead of MLS. Gotcha.

It's going to be high priority, but not top priority. I have a few things that I need to do first. But we'll fix it.