Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-16-2016

(06-16-2016, 11:42 AM)Mystic Pymp Wrote: I've read this on Shannon's journal today:
Quote:Those dominant in emotional focus and have the corresponding physiology will be most receptive and responsive; those people who are most dominant in the physical/sensual focus and have the corresponding physiology will be second most receptive and responsive; those who focus through their passions and energy will be third most responsive, and those who will be the most difficult to affect will be those who focus mostly through their minds.

My question is how can I know which one of those I am? For example I would say I am both emotional and thinking, both in uneasy balance. Also if so what could I possibly do to make the auras more effective? Giving more to my emotional side? Can I control my emotion and restrain them or should I do the opposite, even then it hurts and just embrace it? Any thoughts?

I've already answered this. I use natal astrology for this. But that discussion is for the astrology thread. Alpha360 is likely to be able to help you with that further.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jake2015 - 06-16-2016

(06-16-2016, 01:16 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(06-16-2016, 06:59 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(06-15-2016, 02:15 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(06-15-2016, 01:18 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: Shannon, How loud should you play the silent speaker test mp3 please?

I have a mac book pro 2015 laptop. I did play this at the volume id normally want to play the silent track and it worked without any hiccups.

For the past 8 days I've played the silent track again without any issue.

I used frequensee and it showed that my signal was around 19KHZ and about -50 to -30db from speaker to my ears and further behind.

Today however I played the track at full volume as I was away from my laptop and wanted to make sure if reached my ears. When I sat down at the laptop I then could hear crackling.

When I played the free silent testing mp3, at this loud volume (full volume both on my laptop and my iTunes player), then I could hear crackling very very low and only if I bring my ears to the speakers of the laptop. My apartment is super quiet and this is why I could hear this but its only when Im sat at the laptop.

Is there any issue with my laptop therefore playing silent tracks? i hope not now Sad

Play it at the same levels of audio you would anything else.

All you need to do is calibrate.

Thanks Shannon

Im using iTunes player which came pre-installed onto my mac book pro.

Ive turned the volume lower and the crackling has gone, but I'm worried that the volume is too low, especially for when I'm not sat at the laptop. I walk around my room and leave the laptop at the table that I'm sat at to get to the sink (same room).

So using frequensee this is what I got at the laptop itself. (see image attached)

What do you think?

The issue I have is whether this volume will reach me if I'm not sat around the laptop, so shall I use frequensee with the phone held next to my ear and walk around my apartment and see if how the graph changes? and if so what should I be looking for?

thanks

Play the trickling stream track. Set it, while you are sitting at your computer, to a comfortable volume. Now go to every point in the room, and listen. Just listen. And then to other areas where you will commonly be.

If you do that, you'll find that you can hear it at surprising distances from your laptop. I can hear it playing on my phone, in my bedroom, through the master bedroom, through the bathroom that leads to the hallway, down the hallway and in the living room in my house. And that's at the standard volume I use at night.

The subconscious is MUCH more sensitive to volume than the conscious mind is. I have done experiments where I played a test track only phone at a volume of 1/15 (minimum volume possible), with a lifeproof case on my phone. It still gets results. Not very far from the phone, probably within about 6 feet or about 2 meters, but they are still there. And consciously, for me to hear anything even from an audible track at that point, I need to have the speaker right up to my ear!

Just relax. Calibrate as instructed, then reduce the volume until there are no crackles if necessary, and you're done.

Wow thank you so much Shannon. I was panicked about this and really am grateful! its calmed me right down and I'm going to do this Smile much appreciated it Sir!!


Very Quickly please: Can I listen to masked while watch tv, music, etc? Or is that only with Silent Track?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - shaffk - 06-16-2016

(06-16-2016, 01:06 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(06-16-2016, 01:29 AM)terry44 Wrote: Hey Shannon, is MIR2 going to be in 5.5G? Also, do you think it would help my mother, who has chronic Lyme disease (a nasty bacterial infection)? Or is it more designed for acute viral infections?

Yes. It is being built in 5.5G.

I cannot know if it will help her with Lyme disease until some people test it on that and I have evidence as to what it actually does over a number of trials in the real world.

But, this version is being designed to enable your immune system to be effective in detecting and removing bacterial infections, viral infections, fungal infections and yeast infections, as much as that is actually possible.

So all I can say is, it is designed to work against all types of infections except maybe parasitic, and it is designed to scale to whatever degree is necessary to enable your immune system to overcome and eradicate the infection. What it can actually do, and what is actually possible for your immune system to do, I do not yet know.

I would absolutely love some feedback on Lyme disease, though!

Modulating immune response has to be very delicate/calibrated as a little imbalance can result in auto immune problems/disease, so safety should trump maximum effectiveness if at cross purposes in some way.
Yeast is a type of fungus as well.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-16-2016

(06-16-2016, 04:11 PM)shaffk Wrote:
(06-16-2016, 01:06 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(06-16-2016, 01:29 AM)terry44 Wrote: Hey Shannon, is MIR2 going to be in 5.5G? Also, do you think it would help my mother, who has chronic Lyme disease (a nasty bacterial infection)? Or is it more designed for acute viral infections?

Yes. It is being built in 5.5G.

I cannot know if it will help her with Lyme disease until some people test it on that and I have evidence as to what it actually does over a number of trials in the real world.

But, this version is being designed to enable your immune system to be effective in detecting and removing bacterial infections, viral infections, fungal infections and yeast infections, as much as that is actually possible.

So all I can say is, it is designed to work against all types of infections except maybe parasitic, and it is designed to scale to whatever degree is necessary to enable your immune system to overcome and eradicate the infection. What it can actually do, and what is actually possible for your immune system to do, I do not yet know.

I would absolutely love some feedback on Lyme disease, though!

Modulating immune response has to be very delicate/calibrated as a little imbalance can result in auto immune problems/disease, so safety should trump maximum effectiveness if at cross purposes in some way.
Yeast is a type of fungus as well.

I am only giving the instruction set. "Maximize and enhance the immune system and make it maximally capable and effective against all current infections." The subconscious handles the specifics of how that is put into effect. But I have in every 5.5G program, out of necessity, a safety limiter that is invoked multiple times for every statement in the script. It is aimed at keeping 5.5/6G technology from overloading the user, but it is also designed to make sure that no goal of the program is executed in any manner that would be unsafe for the user of the program.

Obviously I agree with you 100%. Smile That is part of why we always follow the IML creed, Safe, useful and effective. If it's not safe, I don't care how useful or effective it is. It's not going out.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jake2015 - 06-16-2016

Very Quickly please: Can I listen to masked while watch tv, music, etc? Or is that only with Silent Track?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-16-2016

Yes, but you'll have better results using the ultrasonic in that case.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 06-16-2016

AOSI- this puppy is one serious peice sa work Shannon. IM soo deep into E2 , and how its unfolding, that even way down the road -Im not shure I even wanna go near this Monster titled AOSI.... whew!
you've done a helluva job though Shannon thats fer shure and its obvious and wildly so,this is just the begining of what is to come for 5.5-transtional technology into 6G FULL on! Wow.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-16-2016

I'm lookin' to change the world, buddy! We gots ta go straight to the top on that one. Wink


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-16-2016

Just added a new 6G technology to AOSI 2.0, which is known as PNIA. I'd love to brag about what it does, but... it's a secret. It's not a secret that you're gonna like what it does, though.

I also removed scripting to fall back on food as a source of energy, and I am trying to force all energy to come from external, safe, appropriate nonphysical sources. If this fails in testing, I'll put back the fallback scripting.

MIR2 is being developed alongside AOSI2, and it's getting confusing which one has what technology, since they both are developing new technologies as we go along.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - eternity - 06-16-2016

I'm living vicariously through your updates shannon. I'm on BASE2.1 and I'm in it to win it, but your updates have me at the edge of my seat. You are changing the world, that's for sure. Helping us improve our lives goes on in turn to affect other people's lives, and the bigger picture is that the world is a better place because you dedicate your life to improving the lives of people by providing a product to people who are looking to grow themselves.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - THolt - 06-16-2016

All of these classified 6g technologies are piquing my interest to say the least


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 06-16-2016

(06-16-2016, 07:18 PM)Shannon Wrote: I am trying to force all energy to come from external, safe, appropriate nonphysical sources.

Hi Shannon, congrats on PNIA! Looking forward to V2 when it's done, sounds interesting.

But, for awhile now, I've wondered about this "external, safe appropriate nonphysical source of energy". What exactly does that mean? It's hard for me to understand what that means. As if it isn't energy from your body like from fat or from drinks or food, I don't understand where this "energy" comes from.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - eternity - 06-16-2016

Catman, the exact sources aren't clear to me either, but the subconscious will use whatever energy is available...

Most likely 'ambient energy' in your proximity... well that's what I understand anyway.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 06-16-2016

I like the sound of that Shannon, hopefully the non-physical energy sources work better than ever *fingers crossed*
I strongly feel this may possibly be a breakthrough for energy sourcing methods!