Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Natious - 06-12-2016

Shannon Wrote:Modeling AOSI V2 has shown me that the responses that are gotten will depend on a factor that makes perfect sense, but that previously escaped my attention: they will depend on the suitability of the person for receiving information in the way it is being presented through the aura.

In other words, those people who are most receptive to the energies being projected, and best able to sense them, will be most responsive.

Those dominant in emotional focus and have the corresponding physiology will be most receptive and responsive; those people who are most dominant in the physical/sensual focus and have the corresponding physiology will be second most receptive and responsive; those who focus through their passions and energy will be third most responsive, and those who will be the most difficult to affect will be those who focus mostly through their minds.

This is true for V1, and should remain true for V2 and later versions in 6G.

So when you see some people responding and some not, that is likely a big part of the reason why.
How to determine which one we are most dominant in? I have a strong feeling that I am dominant in focusing through my mind considering how much I over-analyze and think everything.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Natious - 06-12-2016

AOSI is like that desert.



RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 06-12-2016

(06-12-2016, 06:57 AM)Natious Wrote:
Shannon Wrote:Modeling AOSI V2 has shown me that the responses that are gotten will depend on a factor that makes perfect sense, but that previously escaped my attention: they will depend on the suitability of the person for receiving information in the way it is being presented through the aura.

In other words, those people who are most receptive to the energies being projected, and best able to sense them, will be most responsive.

Those dominant in emotional focus and have the corresponding physiology will be most receptive and responsive; those people who are most dominant in the physical/sensual focus and have the corresponding physiology will be second most receptive and responsive; those who focus through their passions and energy will be third most responsive, and those who will be the most difficult to affect will be those who focus mostly through their minds.

This is true for V1, and should remain true for V2 and later versions in 6G.

So when you see some people responding and some not, that is likely a big part of the reason why.
How to determine which one we are most dominant in? I have a strong feeling that I am dominant in focusing through my mind considering how much I over-analyze and think everything.

I think Shannon's saying those are how those types will respond to your aura, not whether or not you are responding to the sub and putting out an aura.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jake2015 - 06-12-2016

Shannon, will there be plans on updating the current ERPHA 5.5G to the 6G model? I ask because even though many are seeing positive things it seems from the journals, I can't help but feel that still we will have to listen to this sub for the same duration of 6months or 12months to benefit from a deeper inner clearing and this then makes me feel isn't it the same as when E1 was available too?

So I'm hoping that 6G will enable perhaps a listener to simply listen for 6months or 3months to get a fuller clearing and cleansing of issues such as fear etc

thanks

ps: Having recently read 1 members journal where he has been here since 2014 and confused about how the subs have benefitted him, I'm wondering now whether this E2 is really a bigger leap from E1 and thus would it be better to not expect big things until E version X, Generation 7 or 8 is around?

thanks lol


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-12-2016

(06-11-2016, 08:05 PM)K-Train Wrote: Disclaimer: I don't own Indigo Mind Labs, the following is just my OPINION from a strictly scientific/observational perspective based off my own observations as well as my interpretation of the scientific method.

I'm intrigued by the addition of a female tester. So far, we've seen stuff from just the guys which is fine with me, since that gives me a better baseline. Theoretically, if Shannon has the new goods in AOSI V2 then a female tester should get more approaches (assuming she's heterosexual) because males in the West are encouraged to approach. It'll be good to for any ladies thinking about buying AOSI.

If AOSI V2 is being tested I hope there is also a male tester due to the difference in societal conditioning that men and women undergo. Point blank, a male (who's heterosexual) and is trying to get women to approach him will probably have a harder time than a woman trying to get men to approach her. At least that's how it looks on paper.

My female tester is almost 60 years old, and looks like she is in her late 40's, early 50's. She has a nice body still, and is attractive enough that she gets interest and attention from men significantly younger than herself on regular basis. She has V1 of AOSI, so that I can get more clues as to how to adjust it before I release V2.

This woman is primarily, and very heavily, focused (five points) through the cardinal intellectual plane, and has a secondary focus through the mutable passionate plane. If you want to understand that better, Alpha360 can no doubt be more explanatory - in the appropriate thread, of course.

This woman is used to being attractive and getting interest and attraction from men, but since starting on E2 has lost interest in slogging through the mire of low quality men available where she lives, and I have her testing this program to show me how E2 is affected by and affects AOSI v1, and to see how such a personality will project. It stands to reason that that personality type would be a poor receiver, so are they also a poor projector? We shall see.

AOSI V2 is a long way from ready for me to build. I'm working on figuring out how to trigger maximum sexual dis-inhibition through the aura you generate with it. I think you will appreciate the time I put into that little gem.

But regardless, a female perspective will be valuable for my research and development. I am surprised how much 6G development has come from developing this specific script already.

When AOSI V2 is built, it will be tested by at least 2 males and at least 1 female before I release it for general consumption.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 06-12-2016

(06-12-2016, 09:27 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: ps: Having recently read 1 members journal where he has been here since 2014 and confused about how the subs have benefitted him, I'm wondering now whether this E2 is really a bigger leap from E1 and thus would it be better to not expect big things until E version X, Generation 7 or 8 is around?

thanks lol

And yet, there are so many other journals that go into detail about how plainly E2 has dramatically impacted lives in a very short time frame (<90 days), forever changed. Mine included.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-12-2016

(06-12-2016, 02:22 AM)ALI6NMENT Wrote:
(06-12-2016, 12:15 AM)LionKing Wrote: Me: Ok.. Its time to move on with it, I want to succeed in life.
Mum: You should be successful.
Me: Yes.
Mum: You know that one trauma, you'd probably feel better if you let that go.
Me: Yes, I guess you're right.
Mum: You know, you really want to let it go.
Me: Yes, agreed.
Mum: You should let it go.
Me: Yes.
Mum: Be sure to let it go.
Me: Yes...
Mum: Its gonna go much better if you let it go
Me: Yes yes, I'm trying, could you leave me be for a moment?
Mum: You realize its not good for you, let it go already
Me: I'm not doing a single thing before you stfu and leave me be!
Mum: Its much better to let i....
Me: (shuts the door on her)
Me: (annoyed, need to calm down for a while and forget about her)
Me: (...)
Me: Ah. Ok, now where was I.. Yes that crap - letting go of it now.


That makes hell of alot of sense, especially when it is to do with resistance and these subliminals.

Unless you consider that it's more like this.

Sub: This is how you achieve X as easily as possible. It's a good idea to achieve X.
You: Mom, stop telling me what to do!
Sub: This is how you achieve X as easily as possible. It's a good idea to achieve X.
You: I refuse to cooperate because you're forcing it down my throat.
Sub: This is how you achieve X as easily as possible. It's a good idea to achieve X.
You: FUCK OFF! I WILL NOT BE TOLD WHAT TO DO!

Sub gets turned off for being bad and telling you what to do.

You: This is how I achieve X as easily as possible. It's a good idea for me to achieve X. I think I will achieve X in this way now, because mom's not telling me what to do and I can do what I want to do, which is what I wanted to do all along, but because I have to have control and be right, I decided to sabotage myself and waste time and energy to be right and have control, when in the end I'm either going to waste time, energy and money resisting, or I'm going to waste time and energy resisting and then doing what I was given the suggestion to do anyway.

Consider that:

A) The program is not telling you what to do, it's telling you how to achieve a goal YOU WANT TO ACHIEVE in the best and easiest possible way.
B) Nobody's forcing you to run the program, so you are obviously running it because YOU WANT TO ACHIEVE THE GOAL.
C) It still makes NO SENSE to choose to run a program, because you want to achieve it's goal, and then resist it and refuse to achieve the goal because you are taking what it is saying as a command, when it is an instruction set being presented AS A SUGGESTION.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 06-12-2016

FIRST OF ALL E2 is miles ahead of E1 in soooo many many a way ,its like the difference between a bad ass mazeratti and a UFO.... yes there is HUGE difference in the two... E3 'er E -"X",when ever it arrives will be signifgantly better than e2 but E2 still has the capcity to elevate heal and renew a persons being-ness as such,I can verfy that as I've been on it for 19 days now..and 19 days ONLY my life is changing in more ways that I am willing to write a book about here.

I had already planned a post here for Shannon which is : I took a look at the overcoming the Victim Mentality Script Shannon.was wondering if this is intentional or a typo on your part or whomever's? and before I go ANY further Im the FIRST ONE to admit that Im the King of Typos,and mispells- with that said here growzz:

I now make myself impossible to victimize. ( is that supposed to be "to be victimized or to victimize or both??)
I now be letting go of the past more and more. <---- same ,same, supposed to be this way or ???)
I now be uninterested in getting pity from others. <----- (I Now 'be' ?.)


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-12-2016

(06-12-2016, 06:57 AM)Natious Wrote:
Shannon Wrote:Modeling AOSI V2 has shown me that the responses that are gotten will depend on a factor that makes perfect sense, but that previously escaped my attention: they will depend on the suitability of the person for receiving information in the way it is being presented through the aura.

In other words, those people who are most receptive to the energies being projected, and best able to sense them, will be most responsive.

Those dominant in emotional focus and have the corresponding physiology will be most receptive and responsive; those people who are most dominant in the physical/sensual focus and have the corresponding physiology will be second most receptive and responsive; those who focus through their passions and energy will be third most responsive, and those who will be the most difficult to affect will be those who focus mostly through their minds.

This is true for V1, and should remain true for V2 and later versions in 6G.

So when you see some people responding and some not, that is likely a big part of the reason why.
How to determine which one we are most dominant in? I have a strong feeling that I am dominant in focusing through my mind considering how much I over-analyze and think everything.

I use natal astrology for that. There are other ways as well. Not everyone agrees with my methods. Astrological discussion, of course, goes in the astrology thread.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-12-2016

(06-12-2016, 09:27 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: Shannon, will there be plans on updating the current ERPHA 5.5G to the 6G model? I ask because even though many are seeing positive things it seems from the journals, I can't help but feel that still we will have to listen to this sub for the same duration of 6months or 12months to benefit from a deeper inner clearing and this then makes me feel isn't it the same as when E1 was available too?

So I'm hoping that 6G will enable perhaps a listener to simply listen for 6months or 3months to get a fuller clearing and cleansing of issues such as fear etc

thanks

ps: Having recently read 1 members journal where he has been here since 2014 and confused about how the subs have benefitted him, I'm wondering now whether this E2 is really a bigger leap from E1 and thus would it be better to not expect big things until E version X, Generation 7 or 8 is around?

thanks lol

You astonish me. First I gave you an ambulance (V1) and it does the job, but it's not really fast or a smooth ride. Then I gave you an ambulance with a Ferrari racing engine, racing tires and a race car driver. (V2) Much faster and smoother. But they both have to drive at the speed limit YOU SET.

Now you're complaining because the program only drives at the speed at which YOU MAKE IT GO?

I guarantee you, if you use V1 for 12 months, and V2 for 12 months, you'll get many times the benefit from V2. Many, many times. But for it to work at maximum success, it goes as fast as YOU can handle. V1 tried to plow through everything instead, and that caused the user to slow it down and resist.

Yes, I am planning to upgrade E2 to 6G. But even then, it will not work faster than you can go. Because going at the speed at which you are ready and able to process change, growth and healing is not going to be changed by more power. It still depends on what is safe and effective FOR YOU.

I think you are allowing yourself to be influenced too much by your conscious insecurities. And there will almost certainly not be a G7 or G8 in this next 10 years. 6G is being designed to be all that is possible to do at this time.

It also seems like a very subtle, very clever ploy on the part of your subconscious to get you to stop using the program because it wants to avoid following the instructions it's being given.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - mat422 - 06-12-2016

(06-12-2016, 10:20 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(06-12-2016, 09:27 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: ps: Having recently read 1 members journal where he has been here since 2014 and confused about how the subs have benefitted him, I'm wondering now whether this E2 is really a bigger leap from E1 and thus would it be better to not expect big things until E version X, Generation 7 or 8 is around?

thanks lol

And yet, there are so many other journals that go into detail about how plainly E2 has dramatically impacted lives in a very short time frame (<90 days), forever changed. Mine included.

Yup. I've been here since 2010 and having experienced the early subliminals I can tell you E2 is amazing in what it does. It's not always about how fast you get results. With E2 it's like a steady climb to being your best self. This subliminal works with you in all the right ways and that's the beauty of it. You can have the most powerful subliminal but if the mind rejects it its worthless.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 06-12-2016

Bamm! There it is!!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-12-2016

(06-12-2016, 10:27 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: FIRST OF ALL E2 is miles ahead of E1 in soooo many many a way ,its like the difference between a bad ass mazeratti and a UFO.... yes there is HUGE difference in the two... E3 'er E -"X",when ever it arrives will signifgantly better than e2 but E2 still has the capcity to elevate heal and renew a persons being-ness as such,I can verfy that as I've been on it for 19 days now..and 19 days ONLY my life is changing in more ways that I am willing to write a book about here about,

I had already planned a post here for Shannon which is : I took a look at the overcoming the Victim Mentality Script Shannon.was wondering if this is intentional or a typo on your part or whomever's? and before I go ANY further Im the FIRST ONE to admit that Im the King of Typos,and mispells- with that said here growzz:

I now make myself impossible to victimize. ( is that supposed to be "to be victimized or to victimize or both??)
I now be letting go of the past more and more. <---- same ,same, supposed to be this way or ???)
I now be uninterested in getting pity from others. <----- (I Now 'be' ?.)

That's what happens when you use a find and replace instead of doing a line by line script walk through. It's things like that that led me to significantly step up the quality control, which is why I have been doing line by line walk throughs for years now, and why it takes me so long to build one of these.

I'm pretty sure that is not in the actual build script for that program, but I will look at the script. Of course if it is, I'll rebuild it. But when I was building E2 and including that script, I did not find that error in the script when I did the line by line walk through, which is why I say I doubt that is in the build script of that program.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 06-12-2016

Truly Appreciated. thank you Sir. Keith.