(06-09-2016, 08:42 PM)dissonance Wrote: "Those dominant in emotional focus and have the corresponding physiology will be most receptive and responsive; those people who are most dominant in the physical/sensual focus and have the corresponding physiology will be second most receptive and responsive; those who focus through their passions and energy will be third most responsive, and those who will be the most difficult to affect will be those who focus mostly through their minds."

What are some examples or further explanations for each of these? I'm not quite sure which one I am from reading that.

(06-09-2016, 08:42 PM)dissonance Wrote: "Those dominant in emotional focus and have the corresponding physiology will be most receptive and responsive; those people who are most dominant in the physical/sensual focus and have the corresponding physiology will be second most receptive and responsive; those who focus through their passions and energy will be third most responsive, and those who will be the most difficult to affect will be those who focus mostly through their minds."

What are some examples or further explanations for each of these? I'm not quite sure which one I am from reading that.

(06-09-2016, 08:46 PM)dissonance Wrote: Also, is the version of OGSF in AOSI scripted with 5.5G methods? or is it just OGSF 5G with a bit of it taken out?

(06-09-2016, 10:30 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(06-09-2016, 08:42 PM)dissonance Wrote: "Those dominant in emotional focus and have the corresponding physiology will be most receptive and responsive; those people who are most dominant in the physical/sensual focus and have the corresponding physiology will be second most receptive and responsive; those who focus through their passions and energy will be third most responsive, and those who will be the most difficult to affect will be those who focus mostly through their minds."

What are some examples or further explanations for each of these? I'm not quite sure which one I am from reading that.

Most people are a mix of these, and sometimes so much so that it is impossible to tell without using some esoteric system to figure it out.

Generally these personality/physiology types will correspond to the archetypal elements used by the ancients, as Alpha360 pointed out.

The two personality/physiology types most receptive tend on average to have stockier frames and more of a tendency to increased body fat. The two less receptive tend to be more active and of less body fat on average and taller and thinner.

When you mix them, you can end up with some body types that are very hard to classify. I happen to be a mix of three of them, and you'd never guess two of them. Only the passionate type makes itself outwardly known in my body type.

It is, however, too simplistic by far to say that, for example, passionate types have red hair - although it is frequently true that when this element/personality/physiology is dominant, red hair is a likelihood. It is more common for the presence of the redhead gene to be associated, with brown hair instead.

It's not just four types of people. There are many combinations possible, but it is too complex to say that in a quick note.

(06-10-2016, 01:43 AM)Light Wrote: Shannon, i wanted to ask you if it is resistence that i am having with the new sub AOSI or something else. I used it now for almost a week.
i have almost all the things that others report except attention or attraction from women. I mean i feel hungry after one loop, i am thirsty, i have better concentration when i play the sub, i have morning wood everyday, , and it gets me really tired in the evening and early in the morning. I am listening around 11 or 12 hours.

(06-10-2016, 09:32 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Shannon, I've been thinking about another thing AOSI should probably have (not sure if you thought of this or not) but that's a direct link to the user from the person of their desire. What I mean by that is, it's great if we can affect them in person, but if we go away and then the charm wears off, the sub won't be that useful as many women (at least ime) like to put a buffer between you and them. Prolly an ASD response.

Plus, if we get them all hot and bothered but then they go off and bang some other dude and are now satisfied, that won't do us any good either. I imagine there's got to be something to do about this, but you're the expert.

(06-10-2016, 10:03 AM)maxx55 Wrote:

(06-10-2016, 09:32 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Shannon, I've been thinking about another thing AOSI should probably have (not sure if you thought of this or not) but that's a direct link to the user from the person of their desire. What I mean by that is, it's great if we can affect them in person, but if we go away and then the charm wears off, the sub won't be that useful as many women (at least ime) like to put a buffer between you and them. Prolly an ASD response.

Plus, if we get them all hot and bothered but then they go off and bang some other dude and are now satisfied, that won't do us any good either. I imagine there's got to be something to do about this, but you're the expert.

I agree. Some kind of "imprinting" effect added to AOSI would be great! Regardless if she has a partner or not, it'd be great if the user was still on her mind.

(06-10-2016, 10:17 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:

(06-10-2016, 10:03 AM)maxx55 Wrote:

(06-10-2016, 09:32 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Shannon, I've been thinking about another thing AOSI should probably have (not sure if you thought of this or not) but that's a direct link to the user from the person of their desire. What I mean by that is, it's great if we can affect them in person, but if we go away and then the charm wears off, the sub won't be that useful as many women (at least ime) like to put a buffer between you and them. Prolly an ASD response.

Plus, if we get them all hot and bothered but then they go off and bang some other dude and are now satisfied, that won't do us any good either. I imagine there's got to be something to do about this, but you're the expert.

I agree. Some kind of "imprinting" effect added to AOSI would be great! Regardless if she has a partner or not, it'd be great if the user was still on her mind.

While I love this idea, you really gotta watch out when dealing with imprinting and fallout. Back in my pheromone days, I experimented with fallout extensively (using commercial phero blends too, nothing fancy). I was able to succeed, but man -- if you're not ready to commit to that chick, you're asking for trouble. I just lost a really good friend because of this. I induced fallout using pheros over the course of a month or so, we hooked up a lot and then I never committed because she had a boyfriend. When they broke up, she naturally thought I was going to get with her. When I didn't, she got nastier and nastier until I finally had to break things off.

(06-10-2016, 10:17 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: If ANYTHING, instead of inducing fallout in her, you should ask for some kind of implementation for Natural Seduction for Men so that you'll just go for it regardless of any fears.