Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 06-01-2016

(06-01-2016, 05:45 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(06-01-2016, 05:40 AM)Sky_Wolf Wrote: This HTC sounds crazy powerfull, Can't wait to try AM7 using it, all this top secret stuff is getting me excited.

@Shannon, what is the difference in tech between 5.5 and 6 Generation subs?

HTC is a phone. HCT is HyperCompression Technology. Smile I actually got it wrong in the description, so no biggie.

5.5 and 6G is different in the number of technologies in use and their level of use.

6G prototype has over 80 of these technologies that I have had a chance to document, and many more left. Not all of them will be in use in any given program built in 6G, but they will be used to the fullest.

5.5G is me learning how to implement them, and building the skeleton script for the 6G programs slowly but surely adding in more and of them over time. The technologies that are in use in 5.5G may be only partially implemented or only partially enabled.

6G sounds so crazy...

When AM7 comes out... insta buy, especially now that I have a job. FINALLY


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-01-2016

(06-01-2016, 02:37 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Quick question Shannon. Is goal 2 of AOSI (achieving self-validation, deservedness, etc.) achieving part of the same goals as E2 and AM?

What I mean is, if someone used E2 or AM beforehand, and then used AOSI, would goal 1 be achieved quicker? Or is the self-validation and self-deservedness in AOSI exclusively addressing sexual issues?

It's all going to be helping in the same direction. It's about being congruent with the sexual and sexy and magnetic energy you are putting out there.

Imagine a guy who is bursting with super sexy energy, but is a nervous wreck. This communicates the following:

* I'm sexy as hell, and ready to go. Come fuck me.
* I'm nervous and scared and completely unready for a sexual encounter. Please stay away.

When you communicate any contradictions like this, the result is 99.9999999999% of the time going to be that the observer chooses to back off.

So yes, they're all working toward the same goals, and you can get further with AOSI by mastering yourself first.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-01-2016

(06-01-2016, 04:22 PM)Kurohawk Wrote: Hey guys i just purchsed AOSI and i have a question, what should i use? flac or MP3 . i have no clue what the difference is and i will play it on my iphone.

Flac and MP3 differ in two ways.

1. File size. If this is more important for you, as you have limited space.
2. Audio quality. If this is more important for you, choose FLAC, as it gives a small improvement in subliminal audio clarity, which gives a slight edge for effectiveness.

I think I remember that iPhones suck, so they can't use FLAC. Apple uses ALAC instead, so you would have to use mp3. I don't recommend trying to transcode it from FLAC to ALAC, because at that point you have no guarantee that it's still pristine and undamaged.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-01-2016

(06-01-2016, 04:48 PM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:This instant starvation makes me think I could turn this effect into a weight loss program. Two parts. Part 1: maintain current eating habits EXACTLY, without allowing sensations of hunger to change at all. Part 2: multiply energy expenditure to cause the person to burn off all food ingested and all excess fat.

Hmm my thought is what happens when you stop the program and aren't burning that same energy. Would it then be easier for them to put it back on?

I'd be keen for a 'get ripped' program more for bodybuilders/gym people where I lose fat and get ripped while maintaining muscle. At this point I don't think the weight loss program is suited for my goal since it has measurement specifications inbuilt and I want to get more muscular.

And to be able to maintain the being ripped. I don't care about crazy ripped like bodybuilding competition level but if I could maintain something like 12% bodyfat it'd be cool.

Obviously that would not and could not be the whole goal and focus and effect of the program. It would be useful for getting weight under control quickly while we were to adjust everything else behind the scenes that caused the weight issues in the first place, so that when you're done, you don't need to burn massive amounts of energy and your eating habits allow for the weight to stay off.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-01-2016

(06-01-2016, 05:50 PM)dissonance Wrote:
(06-01-2016, 05:45 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(06-01-2016, 05:40 AM)Sky_Wolf Wrote: This HTC sounds crazy powerfull, Can't wait to try AM7 using it, all this top secret stuff is getting me excited.

@Shannon, what is the difference in tech between 5.5 and 6 Generation subs?

HTC is a phone. HCT is HyperCompression Technology. Smile I actually got it wrong in the description, so no biggie.

5.5 and 6G is different in the number of technologies in use and their level of use.

6G prototype has over 80 of these technologies that I have had a chance to document, and many more left. Not all of them will be in use in any given program built in 6G, but they will be used to the fullest.

5.5G is me learning how to implement them, and building the skeleton script for the 6G programs slowly but surely adding in more and of them over time. The technologies that are in use in 5.5G may be only partially implemented or only partially enabled.

6G sounds so crazy...

When AM7 comes out... insta buy, especially now that I have a job. FINALLY

6G is beyond crazy. It's so complex now that I think the only way I could possibly ever hope to have it be consistent from build to build is to use a skeleton file, which is why I am using 5.5G to develop one.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 06-01-2016

(06-01-2016, 05:54 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(06-01-2016, 04:22 PM)Kurohawk Wrote: Hey guys i just purchsed AOSI and i have a question, what should i use? flac or MP3 . i have no clue what the difference is and i will play it on my iphone.

Flac and MP3 differ in two ways.

1. File size. If this is more important for you, as you have limited space.
2. Audio quality. If this is more important for you, choose FLAC, as it gives a small improvement in subliminal audio clarity, which gives a slight edge for effectiveness.

I think I remember that iPhones suck, so they can't use FLAC. Apple uses ALAC instead, so you would have to use mp3. I don't recommend trying to transcode it from FLAC to ALAC, because at that point you have no guarantee that it's still pristine and undamaged.

You misspelled rock as "suck" :p

You can get the TuneShell app and listen to FLAC on iPhones through there. Options to loop and everything.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-01-2016

(06-01-2016, 06:06 PM)maxx55 Wrote:
(06-01-2016, 05:54 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(06-01-2016, 04:22 PM)Kurohawk Wrote: Hey guys i just purchsed AOSI and i have a question, what should i use? flac or MP3 . i have no clue what the difference is and i will play it on my iphone.

Flac and MP3 differ in two ways.

1. File size. If this is more important for you, as you have limited space.
2. Audio quality. If this is more important for you, choose FLAC, as it gives a small improvement in subliminal audio clarity, which gives a slight edge for effectiveness.

I think I remember that iPhones suck, so they can't use FLAC. Apple uses ALAC instead, so you would have to use mp3. I don't recommend trying to transcode it from FLAC to ALAC, because at that point you have no guarantee that it's still pristine and undamaged.

You misspelled rock as "suck" :p

You can get the TuneShell app and listen to FLAC on iPhones through there. Options to loop and everything.

I mis-spelled "sucks like a black hole" as what now? Big Grin

I just don't like Apple products because they try to exclude everyone else (Bluetooth, anyone?) and make their users jump through stupid hoops like having to use an app to use a universal standard like bluetooth and FLAC.

But hey, you can't see a black hole cause its black. I forgive you. Big Grin


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 06-01-2016

(06-01-2016, 06:30 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(06-01-2016, 06:06 PM)maxx55 Wrote:
(06-01-2016, 05:54 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(06-01-2016, 04:22 PM)Kurohawk Wrote: Hey guys i just purchsed AOSI and i have a question, what should i use? flac or MP3 . i have no clue what the difference is and i will play it on my iphone.

Flac and MP3 differ in two ways.

1. File size. If this is more important for you, as you have limited space.
2. Audio quality. If this is more important for you, choose FLAC, as it gives a small improvement in subliminal audio clarity, which gives a slight edge for effectiveness.

I think I remember that iPhones suck, so they can't use FLAC. Apple uses ALAC instead, so you would have to use mp3. I don't recommend trying to transcode it from FLAC to ALAC, because at that point you have no guarantee that it's still pristine and undamaged.

You misspelled rock as "suck" :p

You can get the TuneShell app and listen to FLAC on iPhones through there. Options to loop and everything.

I mis-spelled "sucks like a black hole" as what now? Big Grin

I just don't like Apple products because they try to exclude everyone else (Bluetooth, anyone?) and make their users jump through stupid hoops like having to use an app to use a universal standard like bluetooth and FLAC.

But hey, you can't see a black hole cause its black. I forgive you. Big Grin

Haha, Shannon you have a point.

*sent from my iPhone*


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 06-01-2016

That's not true. Bluetooth works normally on the iPhone with items like speakers headphones and cars


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-01-2016

(06-01-2016, 06:44 PM)Kibagame Jubei Wrote: That's not true. Bluetooth works normally on the iPhone with items like speakers headphones and cars

Of course. But just try sending a file to, or receiving one from, an Android phone (around 80% of the phones in use right now) and see how well Apple does standard bluetooth then.

No, one or both of us would have to download an app, set it up, figure it out and THEN maybe (maybe!) we can do a simple phone to phone file share that would be effortless on Android to Android or Apple to Apple.

But Apple wants you to stay with them, so they... mess with your standards and... make you jump through... hoops... hmmm. Makes me wonder what they're smoking at Apple.

Customers like convenience. That's what got them where they are. Now they're forgetting that fact. Well, I guess as long as you guys with iPhones are happy with it they can get away with it. But don't blame me if you ever come across me in person and I offer you a free sub and you can't accept it because you run an iPhone. Sucks to be you. lol

All the people I have tried to help, with free subs, that Apple has stopped... it's just evil, I tell you!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AbundanceCH - 06-01-2016

I think most people here missed Shannon's post on the BAMM forum where he says he might rebuild BAMM in 6g and it might be as short as 1, 3 or 6 stages.

That I think is the must have subliminal even before alpha male if it is made in 6g.

Shannon, any plans to rebuild BASE if so will it be in 5.5 or 6g?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 06-01-2016

I get it. That's an awesome story. I'm probably not as tech savy as you. The Apple ID is annoying I admit. However my phone and computer have been pretty reliable with just using subs. So will probably relate back to your post when ready to move on to different (better) tech.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-01-2016

(06-01-2016, 06:58 PM)Kibagame Jubei Wrote: I get it. That's an awesome story. I'm probably not as tech savy as you. The Apple ID is annoying I admit. However my phone and computer have been pretty reliable with just using subs. So will probably relate back to your post when ready to move on to different (better) tech.

Don't get me wrong, Apple hardware and tech is very, very good. They're just pulling stupid corporate crap to force their customers to do things their way. I happen to disagree with it. So... I use PCLinuxOS for 99% of what I do on a laptop and Android for 99% of what I do on a phone. I also use Windows 8.1 for the only software I have left that isn't either Linux native or can be gotten to run on Linux, which is the TTS reader I use. But eventually even that will fall, and Windows too will go bye bye.

Did you know that PlayStation gaming consoles are running FreeBSD under the hood? I couldn't make up my mind on PS4 vs XBox 1 until I heard that. Now I just have to muster up enough give-a-shit to actually buy one. I can't seem to get that far. Who has time for gaming, when you're developing this technology I'm developing?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 06-01-2016

(06-01-2016, 06:57 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: I think most people here missed Shannon's post on the BAMM forum where he says he might rebuild BAMM in 6g and it might be as short as 1, 3 or 6 stages.

That I think is the must have subliminal even before alpha male if it is made in 6g.

Shannon, any plans to rebuild BASE if so will it be in 5.5 or 6g?

I was wondering if the current 6 stagers could turn into 6G 3 stagers due to how much info can be put in each track. But if transformations would be stronger with the 6 stage format in 6G, then it should stay that way.