+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 05-29-2016
(05-29-2016, 10:05 PM)K-Train Wrote:(05-29-2016, 09:48 PM)CatMan Wrote: *readies payment while camera pans in slowly and laughing maniacally*
On another topic, you mentioned beast 7 doing well. I remember you saying beast 7 would be the last, or second last prototype developed. Do you still feel this way? If so, 6G development is still coming along well and that's ALSO wonderful news.
I'm very happy AOSI will be done tonight, can't wait to buy it! Interesting that it may be able to be used as a NSFM-type alongside another program. Of course I expect it to not really have THAT profound of an effect in such short term situations, of course.
I think we all might be pleasantly surprised in that regard. Using NSFM for 5 days straight with at least 30 minutes of exposure through stereo/headphones was enough to put me on cruise control for over a week. And of course, that's with old tech.
I do believe that one of the key factors to speed of results which Shannon alluded to earlier is going to be the amount of time needed for AOSI to clear out any internal gunk. People who have run EPHRA 2.0 for a significant time should (theoretically) have a blast on this thing.
Yeah good call, it's possible.
I'm just not holding my breath about it doing anything meaningful in a few hours of listening, especially when the "main" program you're using is steering your mind in another direction entirely. Like with me and E2.
So really, the "reality" I believe it will boil down to for me, is using E2, *or* AOSI. Being that I came to this forum many moons ago to solve this ONE issue of my life, that AOSI siren's call will be insane. It seems I will soon have what I've needed right in front of me. I'll have to do some thinking.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 05-29-2016
(05-29-2016, 08:30 PM)Shannon Wrote: Sometimes, self incrimination is what gets the women to respond to you the way you want.
Today I had a woman flirt with me twice, who has been an impenetrable wall of ice for the six months I have known her, because I started expressing my attraction. Only took 30 minutes, too.
Yea maybe by saying " I don't Beleive in relationships" would push women to change that notion by being seductive in a way that you'd want to pursue a relationship with her.
I've seen this work when
1. A person is dominant in other areas of their life and
2. The person isn't being self entitled to the woman already.
Bibles of truth
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 05-29-2016
My new job starts tomorrow (after so much procrastination). I'm gonna buy this AOSI asap for SURE!!!!
There are a few gorgeous girls that work there, possibly more because I've only seen the people who are there during a couple days I was there. It's a trendy upscale restaurant so all the workers there range from attractive to extremely attractive (at least in the front of house staff lol)
This combined with pheros... can't wait.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 05-29-2016
The possibility of using e2 while sleeping and then aosi for a couple hours for a little sexy vibe has given me a 7G strength boner.
I know its not confirmed as possible yet... But still. My god.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 05-29-2016
Hey Shannon, how are things going?
Is it done being built?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016
(05-29-2016, 09:42 PM)Lowe Wrote:(05-29-2016, 09:08 PM)Shannon Wrote: Just a heads up. I'm working on a new fragrance idea I have that is going to be designed for men to be a strong aphrodisiac. It's going to be based on triggering the primal instincts using nothing but standard perfumery components.
Shannon, do you see the new fragrance as complementary for use with unscented pheromones? I am thinking using the fragrance this way can maximise the effect it has on women. And then the new AOSI will be the sledgehammer.
Which brings up a thought: Shannon, you previously formulated one of the most potent pheromone mix ever made, if nostalgic stories and reports from veteran users are correct. Why leave the pheromone part behind for perfumery-only fragrances, especially one meant to be aphrodisiac?
Some of my fragrances will be usable with pheromones, and some will not. That will be specified.
As to why not pheromones...
Pheromones are a complex subject, and while I am capable with them, I have not been able to keep up with the new options for quite some time now as I focused in other areas.
It is very expensive to stock a lab, be it a perfumery lab or a pheromone lab. There is only so much money available in my R&D budget each month.
Pheromones have something of a bad rep right now.
I have friends who make their livings with pheromones, with whom I don't wish to compete.
I can create the same effects as pheromones, and possibly more powerfully and more effectively, with subliminals.
And... perfumery is fun, and perfumery aimed at achieving the same effects as pheromones, without using pheromones is killing two birds with one stone.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016
(05-29-2016, 09:48 PM)CatMan Wrote:(05-29-2016, 09:37 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-29-2016, 09:20 PM)CatMan Wrote: Are you building AOSI at this moment, Shannon?
Awhile ago you posted about going off to build, I just wanted to know.
It feels like Christmas Eve, the middle of the night, lmao.
Yes, recording the audio. Going to have to stop and eat soon, and drink some tea, but it will be built tonight.
*readies payment while camera pans in slowly and laughing maniacally*
On another topic, you mentioned beast 7 doing well. I remember you saying beast 7 would be the last, or second last prototype developed. Do you still feel this way? If so, 6G development is still coming along well and that's ALSO wonderful news.
I'm very happy AOSI will be done tonight, can't wait to buy it! Interesting that it may be able to be used as a NSFM-type alongside another program. Of course I expect it to not really have THAT profound of an effect in such short term situations, of course.
Beast 6 is doing very well in the few trials I have been able to put it through. Definitely and noticeably more powerful and capable than Beast 5. But it is not, so far, achieving the goal.
Yesterday's trial, however, produced a couple of results that dropped my jaw. One was that one of the most resistant tester I have was able to resist the effects fully during exposure, but was unable to resist them when the end of exposure came. Even she was unable to resist once input stopped. And the second one was that the most resistant of my testers was unable to resist responding overtly for the first time ever.
So yes, it's much more powerful than Beast 5, approximately six times more powerful, but still it is not yet producing the design goal target results. I am noting why and making adjustments. It may yet be a few months or even more, but I have started working on the first steps to building the first 6G public prototype.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016
(05-29-2016, 11:23 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hey Shannon, how are things going?
Is it done being built?
No, the audio is recorded, but blood sugar became a priority. I am back from dinner, and build resumes.
Just because I am finished building it tonight doesn't mean I will be able to put it up right away, though. I have a lot to do after I build it, including packaging, encoding, testing, verifying, uploading, hashing, writing the store page.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - swisston - 05-30-2016
Presumably the BIATBWS part of AOSI will be permanent though, and a lot sooner than the 4g version, with sufficient use?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-30-2016
(05-30-2016, 12:01 AM)swisston Wrote: Presumably the BIATBWS part of AOSI will be permanent though, and a lot sooner than the 4g version, with sufficient use?
If you use the program for long enough, that is a definite probability.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-30-2016
AOSI ultrasonic raw is built. AOSI masked is being vocoded.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 05-30-2016
Sweet.
Now it's built perhaps you have an answer for us concerning if/how we can use it in conjunction with other subs?
E.g. I would like to use E2 around 8-10 hours while I sleep, then AOSI 2-3 hours in the day before I need a sexiness boost.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-30-2016
Because we cannot have more than one period in a file name onour server, it will be referenced in the file names as "5_5G" instead of "5.5G".
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-30-2016
(05-30-2016, 12:32 AM)kenpachi Wrote: Sweet.
Now it's built perhaps you have an answer for us concerning if/how we can use it in conjunction with other subs?
E.g. I would like to use E2 around 8-10 hours while I sleep, then AOSI 2-3 hours in the day before I need a sexiness boost.
Not done building yet. Still have to encode and tag. Then I can start modeling optimal usage patterns.
EDIT: Oh, still have to calculate the Audio-To-Silence ratio, too.