Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 05-29-2016

Interesting info about aura based subs. So AOSI isn't intended for permanent results which would interfere with other programs it sounds more and more similar to NSFM. So theoretically, due to the state shifting tech and the other ABC EFG modules could one could use AOSI as kind of a pick-me-up before a night out? Or perhaps a more appropriate question would be should a person use AOSI in that way?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spiritman - 05-29-2016

(05-29-2016, 06:26 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-29-2016, 10:06 AM)Sky_Wolf Wrote: @Shannon

On PT people keep going on about your frags and that you are selling them, or used too, through this forum.

Is this true or just misinformation?

I am currently in the process of designing and creating a set of fragrances for an initial line that we will be offering to the public when that line is finished and at a quality level that meets my demands and which Andrew feels comfortable with also. Neither of us is easy to please, but we are partners, so we are going to be doubly picky when it comes to what fragrances we offer.

We haven't started selling them yet; although I do have a dedicated clientele for a couple of my fragrances, who started off as testers and then became addicted to how good it smelled, or the responses it got them or both. Currently that list includes one fragrance for men, and one for women.

Developing fragrances to my standards of excellence is a challenging and slow process. I'm currently working on one called Paradise that is tropical, unisex and sexy, and one that's designed to be fresh, masculine and classy. I'm also working on a more masculinized version of the fragrance for men that has a dedicated clientele, and making it even more erotic.

When we have something we can offer you, trust me, I won't be hiding it.

However, please be aware that we are only going to be making very small batches of each fragrance each year, and therefore each batch becomes a very limited supply. We do this because we don't want everyone smelling the same, which maintains the value of the fragrance for those who choose to wear it. We also do this because it allows us a lot more precision and control of the quality we can achieve in making each batch. Currently, my plan is that each fragrance is only batched once per year, and when that year's batch is gone... well, it's gone until the next year.


Damn that sounds like a very limiting supply. So, when people buy it, they might have to get 2 sets, if possible. If they can't buy more than two, then people will have to be very sparingly with what they have to make it last.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016

(05-29-2016, 07:09 PM)K-Train Wrote: Interesting info about aura based subs. So AOSI isn't intended for permanent results which would interfere with other programs it sounds more and more similar to NSFM. So theoretically, due to the state shifting tech and the other ABC EFG modules could one could use AOSI as kind of a pick-me-up before a night out? Or perhaps a more appropriate question would be should a person use AOSI in that way?

AOSI uses ITM-SS only; no triggered state shifting, as again that might interfere with other subs in use later. (EHPRA2 will not, as it is universally supportive of self improvement.)

AOSI is designed for use in two ways, which are it's primary and secondary usage modes:

Primary usage mode is for weeks or months at a time. This will generate and maximize the effect fully, as it will take some time to achieve maximum effect as the program clears away the things that might be an issue and continues to increase your efficiency and effectiveness in achieving the results.

Secondary usage mode is a "once off" before a night out. It can be used for any number of hours before a night out (the more, the better), without long term usage.

In this way, it will behave sort of like an ultra-powerful NSFM, except that it doesn't get YOU to seduce others; instead it will tend to have the effect (when used for enough time beforehand, which will vary from person to person) of getting others to seduce YOU.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016

(05-29-2016, 07:22 PM)spiritman Wrote:
(05-29-2016, 06:26 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-29-2016, 10:06 AM)Sky_Wolf Wrote: @Shannon

On PT people keep going on about your frags and that you are selling them, or used too, through this forum.

Is this true or just misinformation?

I am currently in the process of designing and creating a set of fragrances for an initial line that we will be offering to the public when that line is finished and at a quality level that meets my demands and which Andrew feels comfortable with also. Neither of us is easy to please, but we are partners, so we are going to be doubly picky when it comes to what fragrances we offer.

We haven't started selling them yet; although I do have a dedicated clientele for a couple of my fragrances, who started off as testers and then became addicted to how good it smelled, or the responses it got them or both. Currently that list includes one fragrance for men, and one for women.

Developing fragrances to my standards of excellence is a challenging and slow process. I'm currently working on one called Paradise that is tropical, unisex and sexy, and one that's designed to be fresh, masculine and classy. I'm also working on a more masculinized version of the fragrance for men that has a dedicated clientele, and making it even more erotic.

When we have something we can offer you, trust me, I won't be hiding it.

However, please be aware that we are only going to be making very small batches of each fragrance each year, and therefore each batch becomes a very limited supply. We do this because we don't want everyone smelling the same, which maintains the value of the fragrance for those who choose to wear it. We also do this because it allows us a lot more precision and control of the quality we can achieve in making each batch. Currently, my plan is that each fragrance is only batched once per year, and when that year's batch is gone... well, it's gone until the next year.


Damn that sounds like a very limiting supply. So, when people buy it, they might have to get 2 sets, if possible. If they can't buy more than two, then people will have to be very sparingly with what they have to make it last.

I have in mind, currently, to make each fragrance in a 5 gallon batch per year, and offer it in 50 mL bottles.

A gallon is 128 ounces, and an ounce is 29.97 mL; therefore, a 5 gallon batch could fill as many as 383.616 bottles of that size.

Of course we have to consider various factors such as potential spillage, the amount of product that evaporates during filtration and bottling, the amount that is absorbed by filters or remains on the glass container from which it was poured, accidentally dropped or knocked over bottles. Let us therefore estimate 380 bottles of 50 mL/1.7 oz per fragrance per year.

It is likely that each bottle will be dated, serial numbered and possibly even signed by me by hand as a work of art, thus making it and/or the bottle it came in a collector's item.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016

Ladies and gentlemen, all systems are reporting green and go for build of AOSI in 5.5G. Let us begin.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spiritman - 05-29-2016

(05-29-2016, 07:30 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have in mind, currently, to make each fragrance in a 5 gallon batch per year, and offer it in 50 mL bottles.

A gallon is 128 ounces, and an ounce is 29.97 mL; therefore, a 5 gallon batch could fill as many as 383.616 bottles of that size.

Of course we have to consider various factors such as potential spillage, the amount of product that evaporates during filtration and bottling, the amount that is absorbed by filters or remains on the glass container from which it was poured, accidentally dropped or knocked over bottles. Let us therefore estimate 380 bottles of 50 mL/1.7 oz per fragrance per year.

It is likely that each bottle will be dated, serial numbered and possibly even signed by me by hand as a work of art, thus making it and/or the bottle it came in a collector's item.


That sounds like a good plan and I hope when you are able to release them, that I can buy myself a bottle.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016

(05-29-2016, 07:37 PM)spiritman Wrote:
(05-29-2016, 07:30 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have in mind, currently, to make each fragrance in a 5 gallon batch per year, and offer it in 50 mL bottles.

A gallon is 128 ounces, and an ounce is 29.97 mL; therefore, a 5 gallon batch could fill as many as 383.616 bottles of that size.

Of course we have to consider various factors such as potential spillage, the amount of product that evaporates during filtration and bottling, the amount that is absorbed by filters or remains on the glass container from which it was poured, accidentally dropped or knocked over bottles. Let us therefore estimate 380 bottles of 50 mL/1.7 oz per fragrance per year.

It is likely that each bottle will be dated, serial numbered and possibly even signed by me by hand as a work of art, thus making it and/or the bottle it came in a collector's item.


That sounds like a good plan and I hope when you are able to release them, that I can buy myself a bottle.

We still have a ways to go yet on the back end and in creating the fragrances. There is sourcing bottles, designing bottles, buying the bottles and spray pumps, buying the machinery to crimp the sprayers onto the bottles, deciding how to label them, buying the labeling materials and/or equipment, packaging, designing labels and packaging, etc. etc. etc.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Lowe - 05-29-2016

(05-29-2016, 10:06 AM)Sky_Wolf Wrote: @Shannon

On PT people keep going on about your frags and that you are selling them, or used too, through this forum.

Is this true or just misinformation?

Not exactly. Shannon formulated a pheromone formula for AD, who used to sell it. The resulting product is no longer available but veteran users reported it as being very effective, hence there is a drive to put it through chemical analysis and recreate the mix that he made.

It is not a fragrance, however. Since the talks about it is on PT, it is fairly self-explanatory that it is a pheromone formula rather than a fragrance.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016

(05-29-2016, 07:54 PM)Lowe Wrote:
(05-29-2016, 10:06 AM)Sky_Wolf Wrote: @Shannon

On PT people keep going on about your frags and that you are selling them, or used too, through this forum.

Is this true or just misinformation?

Not exactly. Shannon formulated a pheromone formula for AD, who used to sell it. The resulting product is no longer available but veteran users reported it as being very effective, hence there is a drive to put it through chemical analysis and recreate the mix that he made.

It is not a fragrance, however. Since the talks about it is on PT, it is fairly self-explanatory that it is a pheromone formula rather than a fragrance.

Oh, I guess I misunderstood. Yes, er, this.

Hmm, now where did I put that last remaining bottle of Panty Scorcher?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Breeze - 05-29-2016

Shannon, since AOSI is also designed to give the user a push for the night out, like NSFM. So will we able to run AOSI with some other sub? Like NSFM. Say, a person is running E2, but once in a while decides to play AOSI before the night out for a couple of hours. And then, back to E2.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 05-29-2016

(05-29-2016, 08:06 PM)LeonidasXVI Wrote: Shannon, since AOSI is also designed to give the user a push for the night out, like NSFM. So will we able to run AOSI with some other sub? Like NSFM. Say, a person is running E2, but once in a while decides to play AOSI before the night out for a couple of hours. And then, back to E2.

Don't tase me bro.
If this is true, I see a $228 purchase in my near future.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016

(05-29-2016, 08:06 PM)LeonidasXVI Wrote: Shannon, since AOSI is also designed to give the user a push for the night out, like NSFM. So will we able to run AOSI with some other sub? Like NSFM. Say, a person is running E2, but once in a while decides to play AOSI before the night out for a couple of hours. And then, back to E2.

That's the goal, although the exact amount of time of use maximum, and the amount of uses per unit of time maximum, have yet to be calculated.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-29-2016

(05-29-2016, 08:08 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:
(05-29-2016, 08:06 PM)LeonidasXVI Wrote: Shannon, since AOSI is also designed to give the user a push for the night out, like NSFM. So will we able to run AOSI with some other sub? Like NSFM. Say, a person is running E2, but once in a while decides to play AOSI before the night out for a couple of hours. And then, back to E2.

Don't tase me bro.
If this is true, I see a $228 purchase in my near future.

LOL! Thanks for the laugh, "Don't tase me, bro." Classic.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Breeze - 05-29-2016

(05-29-2016, 08:12 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-29-2016, 08:06 PM)LeonidasXVI Wrote: Shannon, since AOSI is also designed to give the user a push for the night out, like NSFM. So will we able to run AOSI with some other sub? Like NSFM. Say, a person is running E2, but once in a while decides to play AOSI before the night out for a couple of hours. And then, back to E2.

That's the goal, although the exact amount of time of use maximum, and the amount of uses per unit of time maximum, have yet to be calculated.

Shannon, I must say you disappoint me.

You had us considering drop whatever sub we were using. but now we don't have to! You are not that good a tease. Big Grin

Seriously, though, that's great news!