Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 05-28-2016

(05-28-2016, 12:46 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-27-2016, 11:51 PM)kenpachi Wrote: IME, when I reject women in my social circle they either:

1.) Don't speak to me again
2.) Immediately have sex with someone else to try and "hurt" me
3.) Gain new respect and giggle/blush every time they see me

I never thought about "fear of being sexy" being a thing, but I can see how it might be for some if they have never been considered sexy before. My fear is more a fear of being open/vulnerable, but being sexy does nothing but improve your life. The fear of it is irrational... but then I guess so is the fear of vulnerability so I can't judge.

Which brings me onto: is there any programming in AOSI that helps us become more vulnerable with women? When I get IOIs from women, I'll self-sabotage by telling myself I'm too good for her, or that she's lower value and needy because she's approaching me, but I realize it's me protecting my own ego because I am afraid to be open and be rejected.

Will AOSI have anything in there to help with that, or is it outside the scope of the program?

Also, will you be releasing the files in FLAC like you did for E2?

More vulnerable? No.

That's the sort of thing that is outside the goal boundaries of a program like this. It's designed to generate an aura, not heal you. We have other programs for that. Sounds like you should perhaps run one of them first? Although you may be surprised how the program affects you.

Okay, I thought it was probably outside the range of the programs goals. Power + vulnerability = sexy anyway, so it's possible my subconscious will make me more vulnerable in its interpretation of the word sexy. We'll see!

Sorry, think you missed this part: will you be releasing it in FLAC format? Thank you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 05-28-2016

(05-27-2016, 10:17 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-27-2016, 09:23 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I've had women get visibly frustrated from my 'rejecting' them (which was really just me not knowing how to seduce her properly aka "dropping the ball") but I've also had women try to help me seduce them. Maybe that's something you could add as well Shannon, persistence on the girl's part. And so long as you don't outright say " no, I'm not interested " ("safe" phrase maybe that breaks them out of the trance? This is too fun to think about) then she'll keep trying.

That doesn't work, unfortunately. Not for this type of program.

That's too bad. Oh well, it was fun to think about.

EDIT: in line with what alignment was saying, why not make it so women get validation if they sleep with you?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 05-28-2016

(05-27-2016, 11:18 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-27-2016, 10:35 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote:
(05-27-2016, 09:23 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I've had women get visibly frustrated from my 'rejecting' them (which was really just me not knowing how to seduce her properly aka "dropping the ball") but I've also had women try to help me seduce them. Maybe that's something you could add as well Shannon, persistence on the girl's part. And so long as you don't outright say " no, I'm not interested " ("safe" phrase maybe that breaks them out of the trance? This is too fun to think about) then she'll keep trying.

I actually like this idea.

One other thing if it isn't too late. I was wondering Shannon if you could make it so that the Aura also gives the woman (though probably applies to men but too a lesser degree) a kinda of "emotional high" if you will. Even though I don't like David Deangelo that much I do remember him saying something that I distinctly agree with, that "emotions are the most addictive drug there is". I think this applies doubly so for women. Since she has this "emotional high" in your presence it would make her want to be around you when she can and she would have the right amount of emotional high that is appropriate at the time (she might have a different type of emotional high when you are having sex then when you two are watching a movie on a date, if that makes sense?). I mainly mention this for the guys who might enjoy being with multiple women but might have a few that they might want to see multiple times (whether dating/or sex). Who just don't want it to be a ONS type of thing only (maybe a multiple girlfriends/FWBs type of thing). I'm thinking obviously the "emotional high" thing would have to adjust to what shes comfortable with as well not to scare her off.

Thought I would suggest that, even though I have the feeling it might compound how much clingy or stalkerish the girl might get.. Probably??? Don't know if their might be some other unpredictable consequences as well since we are dealing with influencing a person's emotions, which by their nature are unpredictable at times.

Yep. There is a cost to everything. I can run it through the models, though.

Please let us know if you add in the emotional high!

Also, is it possible to add in something so that those you are sexually attracted to and interact with will think about you frequently or a few times a day after you leave?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 05-28-2016

(05-28-2016, 04:22 AM)ALI6NMENT Wrote:
(05-28-2016, 02:43 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Why not make it so women get validation if they sleep with you?

It sounds kind of like...the women seeing you as a challenge, sleeping with you "getting validation" then moving on because that challenge has been won.

Do you mean like that?

That might be the effect, but I'm hoping Shannon can make it so the feeling of validation or being "the girl who got alignment/Sarge into bed" is fleeting and doesn't "count" forever, thus making it so she's compelled to "renew" her status.

I guess it's more a status thing.

Women will sleep with guys for many reasons not always sexual attraction, we might as well capitalize on it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 05-28-2016

(05-28-2016, 07:00 AM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon I'm thinking of doing this after WM: 1 month E2, 1 month this AOS 5.5g sub, and then 1 month AM refresher before going into SM3. Do you think I should change the order at all? And do you think that this new AOS subliminal would boost the effects of SM3 or do you think I should just cut it out since I would be only running it for a month (maybe 2 or 3 if it's amazing I guess).

Don't subs take multiple months to become "permanent?"


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spiritman - 05-28-2016

(05-28-2016, 07:18 AM)Nox Wrote:
(05-28-2016, 07:00 AM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon I'm thinking of doing this after WM: 1 month E2, 1 month this AOS 5.5g sub, and then 1 month AM refresher before going into SM3. Do you think I should change the order at all? And do you think that this new AOS subliminal would boost the effects of SM3 or do you think I should just cut it out since I would be only running it for a month (maybe 2 or 3 if it's amazing I guess).

Don't subs take multiple months to become "permanent?"

Yeah I don't think that is a good idea to do 4 subs like that. By doing that, you are scrambling and scattering your brain into different directions. Plus, if you go through with it, don't expect to see any real significant results because you are using too many subs in a short time period.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 05-28-2016

(05-28-2016, 07:47 AM)spiritman Wrote: Yeah I don't think that is a good idea to do 4 subs like that. By doing that, you are scrambling and scattering your brain into different directions. Plus, if you go through with it, don't expect to see any real significant results because you are using too many subs in a short time period.

Shannon recommended similar to someone else. It was something like E 2, AM6, then SM where the duration of listening to E 2 is entirely up to the user. He would be listening to the AM6 refresher stage 7 for 1 month in this case, which is entirely feasible.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 05-28-2016

Hey Shannon,

When do you think you are going to be able to build for me a sub to get the ability to visualize, imagine & fantasize anything in crystal clear detail at will ? Any dates or approx ?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spiritman - 05-28-2016

(05-28-2016, 08:07 AM)heavysm Wrote:
(05-28-2016, 07:47 AM)spiritman Wrote: Yeah I don't think that is a good idea to do 4 subs like that. By doing that, you are scrambling and scattering your brain into different directions. Plus, if you go through with it, don't expect to see any real significant results because you are using too many subs in a short time period.

Shannon recommended similar to someone else. It was something like E 2, AM6, then SM where the duration of listening to E 2 is entirely up to the user. He would be listening to the AM6 refresher stage 7 for 1 month in this case, which is entirely feasible.

Even if Shannon recommended it, I still wouldn't do it. I think it is better to stick with one thing at a time, then try to use 3-4 subs one right after another within a month of each other. Either way he is free to do what he wants, I am just stating how I feel about it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Darkness - 05-28-2016

Shannon please keep aosi as simple as possible, there's no need for emotional high, when this sub is all about irresistible sex appeal. I want this to work thoroughly, not end up being let down.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 05-28-2016

(05-28-2016, 08:39 AM)Darkness Wrote: Shannon please keep aosi as simple as possible, there's no need for emotional high, when this sub is all about irresistible sex appeal. I want this to work thoroughly, not end up being let down.

I think it's better for it to be like ASC. Being happy and confident attracts girls too.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 05-28-2016

I Agree with Wolverine,Man.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AbundanceCH - 05-28-2016

Questions for Shannon

1. You mentioned that AOS will help you attract whoever you find attractive. So will the subs help us attract those women we find desirable if we have fetishes? For example for us guys that only date blondes, or redheads, or women from a certain ethnicity.

Will you put something in the script to help us do that easier and get us mostly those women? For example "I easily attract women of the ethnic background I am attracted to."

2. Will BASE be rebuilt in 5.5g or 6g if at all? And if it will be rebuilt could you please include the overcome procrastination sub in it if you do rebuild it? This is something that should have been already included in my opinion. I still find myself procrastinating a lot even with BASE. I am motivated but procrastinating and maybe because BASE has certainly steered me in the right direction (the ultra motivation module) but by having overcome procrastination in the sub that would only make my results (and everyone's results) be achievable faster. It certainly wouldn't hurt Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - DarthXedonias - 05-28-2016

(05-28-2016, 03:49 AM)maxx55 Wrote: Please let us know if you add in the emotional high!

Also, is it possible to add in something so that those you are sexually attracted to and interact with will think about you frequently or a few times a day after you leave?


Yeah, do let us know if you put it in.

Also Max, that was kinda of what I'm getting at. When I see women on this "emotional high" its like they can't get enough of the guy. They are constantly texting him, want to be around him, and am thinking about him constantly throughout the day. I think if you can , through the aura, to get the woman to feel the right combination and level of emotions in this emotional high in your presence she will naturally be addicted to it in a way and want to be in your presence very often. As I said though this could cause problems with the woman becoming obsessive, clingy, or stalkerish if she lacks self control. This goes especially for when you say "no" to her and she doesn't know how to handle it but then again thats more of her problem then your own. I think Lowe said it best. If you want to be really sexually attractive (like 20 out of 10 attractive) you have to take both the pros and the cons that come with it.

Quote:Shannon please keep aosi as simple as possible, there's no need for emotional high, when this sub is all about irresistible sex appeal. I want this to work thoroughly, not end up being let down.

I don't know why this would be a problem, unless the models show otherwise. This just guarantees for those that don't just want ONS but still want just mainly a sexual relationship (FWBs,etc) they can have the girl coming back multiple times instead of "well, slept with that hot guy, mission accomplish. Time to move on to something else". There are those times when a guy finds a girl he sleeps with that he actually wants to keep as one of his multiple FWBs/Girlfriends you could say.