Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-22-2016

(03-22-2016, 01:29 AM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:I recently thought this girl was into me. She was suggesting we do things together and hangout with me. Constantly asking my preferences about sex.

The friend sounds full of shit and a cockblock.

I once had a "friend" of mine with whom I worked, tell me that a rather lovely woman with whom we both worked was his girlfriend when he noticed me admiring her as she walked by one day. Because of that, I dropped it, figuring there was no place for me to advance.

Two years later, I get a phone call from her, and during that conversation, she reveals to me that she never dated him, nor did he ever even ask her out. We quickly started dating, and had a 4 year relationship.

Cockblock indeed. Let her tell you she's not interested... and taken.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-22-2016

(03-22-2016, 02:28 AM)AlphaReal Wrote: Shannon... more like guide the user to rewrite the past in a strictly positive light and see it for what it is, a learning about oneself and toughening experience. There is value in it afterall that way.

That is something to think about. The actual implementation, however, is a bit tricky.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ffaux - 03-22-2016

Would MHS help with things like a ruptured disk that sometimes "magically" heal by the body itself but doesn't have a known fix or path to rehabilitation/recovery otherwise?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - zudoshichi - 03-22-2016

(03-21-2016, 07:32 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-21-2016, 12:36 PM)Jakeb203 Wrote: Hey Shannon,

Since you were talking about football programs that magnify the results of BAMM, have you ever considered creating footballs on AM/SM/BASE? It'd be great if we can get extra results based on existing technology. You can implement the 6G tech in the football magnifier in order to make AM and other programs more effective.

Practically speaking you don't even need to create new programs if you can create 6G magnifiers. I know they will still be created regardless. You can release the footballs fast so we get a taste of 6G, and create the new 6G programs while we are enjoying it.

The reason for the football in BAMM is to avoid rebuilding the base program because it is so ridiculously huge and complex, and because it is not necessary to do so given the use of a football.

But, all three of those programs, AM, SM and WM, would massively benefit from a complete rebuild using modern technology and my current understanding based on R&D and observing the challenges people have experienced using them.

The idea may seem good to you, but you would not think so if you knew what I know. Better to forego footballs wherever possible and build the whole thing from scratch.

Since 6G technology will be so advanced according to the description, I guess BASE will be rebuilt as well?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 03-22-2016

Shannon, this is such an early question, but I'll ask anyway. After I finish E2 and I completely self-generate that thought process, would it be to my advantage to run ASC 6G before doing multiple AM6 runs (assuming AM7 isn't out by then, it is I'll do AM7 instead) OR would it best to just go straight to AM6/AM7?

I'm enjoying the results of taking your recommendation to do E2 (I'll post more in detail later this week), so I'm asking for another recommendation.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 03-22-2016

(03-22-2016, 01:29 AM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:I recently thought this girl was into me. She was suggesting we do things together and hangout with me. Constantly asking my preferences about sex.

The friend sounds full of shit and a cockblock.

yeah seriously wtf lol what a twat


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-22-2016

(03-22-2016, 03:46 AM)ffaux Wrote: Would MHS help with things like a ruptured disk that sometimes "magically" heal by the body itself but doesn't have a known fix or path to rehabilitation/recovery otherwise?

I can't know what it will help with ahead of time. That information will only come from observing the results of use by many people. People are a complex dynamic system, and every one is different mentally, physically, emotionally, etc. While I am pretty good now with self optimizing polymorphic and self amplifying scripting, I am neither a medical doctor nor an expert in the physiology of the body.

What I can say is this. If there is a way for the self to heal it, the program will be designed to cause that response from the self - if the self is accepting and executing the script. Beyond that... we shall see.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-22-2016

(03-22-2016, 05:25 AM)zudoshichi Wrote:
(03-21-2016, 07:32 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-21-2016, 12:36 PM)Jakeb203 Wrote: Hey Shannon,

Since you were talking about football programs that magnify the results of BAMM, have you ever considered creating footballs on AM/SM/BASE? It'd be great if we can get extra results based on existing technology. You can implement the 6G tech in the football magnifier in order to make AM and other programs more effective.

Practically speaking you don't even need to create new programs if you can create 6G magnifiers. I know they will still be created regardless. You can release the footballs fast so we get a taste of 6G, and create the new 6G programs while we are enjoying it.

The reason for the football in BAMM is to avoid rebuilding the base program because it is so ridiculously huge and complex, and because it is not necessary to do so given the use of a football.

But, all three of those programs, AM, SM and WM, would massively benefit from a complete rebuild using modern technology and my current understanding based on R&D and observing the challenges people have experienced using them.

The idea may seem good to you, but you would not think so if you knew what I know. Better to forego footballs wherever possible and build the whole thing from scratch.

Since 6G technology will be so advanced according to the description, I guess BASE will be rebuilt as well?

6G is extremely advanced. So advanced, in fact, that the resultant necessity for comparable complexity means that it will not be, nor will it be possible to, use it to rebuild everything, or to rebuild things "just because". It currently takes me 1-2 months to build a single stage 5.5G program. Compare that to typically a few days with 5G. Now consider that 5.5G uses 5 backport 6G technologies, and 6G has an array of 42+ of them. I haven't even finished counting them, that's just how many I have documented so far. There are likely to be well over twice that number when I finish the documentation process.

So the question is, "Does BASE really need to be re-built? Or is it doing the job already?"

So far I don't see a critical need to rebuild it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-22-2016

(03-22-2016, 12:27 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Shannon, this is such an early question, but I'll ask anyway. After I finish E2 and I completely self-generate that thought process, would it be to my advantage to run ASC 6G before doing multiple AM6 runs (assuming AM7 isn't out by then, it is I'll do AM7 instead) OR would it best to just go straight to AM6/AM7?

I'm enjoying the results of taking your recommendation to do E2 (I'll post more in detail later this week), so I'm asking for another recommendation.

I can't know how long it will take to build ASC 6G, or AM7. Or what other programs I will be building in between. I am hoping to build MHS 5.5G and then build Breast Enlargement in 5.5 or 6G, while building ASC in 6G and using the knowledge I gain from doing so in BE.

That said... I suggest that if ASC 6G is out when you finish E2, try it for a bit. If not, well, AM6 is six months and then you can re-assess.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 03-24-2016

I hope, when it's eventually built, DAOS + BIATBWS will be like Life Tune Up having several different modules in it. Like modules for sex appeal, sexual confidence, raw animal magnetism, attractiveness, health, aura/energy of gorgeous good-looks, aura of the rawest sexuality, self-esteem, rate yourself a 20 out of 10, self-esteem/self-respect, be a high quality man etc....The Best you can up with. That will be so worthwhile, it would rock !


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 03-24-2016

Hey Shannon, since EPRHA 2.0 has the C/SAM (I think that's it) tech in it, can we run it for more than 21 hours? In my experience, it's best to run it as much as possible. I have yet to exceed 21 hours though.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 03-24-2016

Will the new max healing speed be like the other programs in that longer duration use (3-6 months) will result in a permanent state, and only need occasional refreshers? I could definitely see that being my next subliminal after EHPRA 2.0 if that's the case.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-25-2016

(03-24-2016, 11:52 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: I hope, when it's eventually built, DAOS + BIATBWS will be like Life Tune Up having several different modules in it. Like modules for sex appeal, sexual confidence, raw animal magnetism, attractiveness, health, aura/energy of gorgeous good-looks, aura of the rawest sexuality, self-esteem, rate yourself a 20 out of 10, self-esteem/self-respect, be a high quality man etc....The Best you can up with. That will be so worthwhile, it would rock !

When the time comes, we shall see. But this is not high on my list of priorities right now.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-25-2016

(03-24-2016, 01:14 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Hey Shannon, since EPRHA 2.0 has the C/SAM (I think that's it) tech in it, can we run it for more than 21 hours? In my experience, it's best to run it as much as possible. I have yet to exceed 21 hours though.

C/SMA - Conscious/Subconscious Mind Alignment Technology.

When you sleep, the conscious mind shuts down. CSMA does not work without a conscious mind to align with and to. But other modules ensure that the results remain effective while you sleep.

You can theoretically run EHPRA 2.0 for 24 hours a day if you can handle it, since it has 20:2 ratio of audio to silence. I would consider such intensive usage experimental though. 21 hours a day is a good max.