Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 03-13-2016

(03-13-2016, 11:36 AM)brightike Wrote:
(03-13-2016, 05:06 AM)terry44 Wrote:
(03-13-2016, 03:44 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: Would be cool if we can get subliminals that don't require 8hours-16hours of usage daily to be effective but 3hours - 6hours max for the 5.5G.

That's what I'm hoping will be one of the benefits of 6g: Less minimum hours per day and less days for permanence.

Sounds a lot like the ever pervasive "Less work for more gain" mentality. The pay out from my last two years of subs has been worth every second. Ain't no such thing as a free lunch.
I think it's considering that the better the technology the easier it gets. But I still think I'll run the new subs for minim 8hours because I'll them during my sleep


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 03-13-2016

All these dudes want giant cocks until they realize their women get so beat up during sex that they only get laid once or twice a week. Bottoming out is also a nightmare. I guess this is cool if you're not ever interested in quickies or figure you'll be sleeping around for the rest of your life. But if you meet that one girl you're crazy about you better hope she's a larger framed woman if you want a lot of sex consistently. You can also keep that fantasy of anal on the fantasy shelf, because in real life you'll be told in no uncertain terms it isn't happening before you ever decide to ask lol

Meanwhile there's all of these guys with average sizes humping nonstop like rabbits with women that they'll be with for the rest of their lives.

The grass is always greener... Why not just accept what you've got and get awesome at sex? A guy giving awesome and multiple orgasms is far more valuable than a size deviation.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 03-13-2016

(03-13-2016, 02:44 PM)Nox Wrote: All these dudes want giant cocks until they realize their women get so beat up during sex that they only get laid once or twice a week. Bottoming out is also a nightmare. I guess this is cool if you're not ever interested in quickies or figure you'll be sleeping around for the rest of your life. But if you meet that one girl you're crazy about you better hope she's a larger framed woman if you want a lot of sex consistently. You can also keep that fantasy of anal on the fantasy shelf, because in real life you'll be told in no uncertain terms it isn't happening before you ever decide to ask lol

Meanwhile there's all of these guys with average sizes humping nonstop like rabbits with women that they'll be with for the rest of their lives.

The grass is always greener... Why not just accept what you've got and get awesome at sex? A guy giving awesome and multiple orgasms is far more valuable than a size deviation.

For me personally, I just wanted to it grow some more so I could look at it swing it around more. And it'll look more pleasing to me when getting a bj.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-13-2016

(03-12-2016, 10:50 PM)AlphaReal Wrote: Thank you Shannon, good enough, I will take my notes.

Hey all what do you think is the right penis size, one that is big enough, but at the same time doesn't hurt you or the girl?

As I read in many places, if the penis size is too big, there's a chance you might bang her cervix and also injure your penis during rough sex since it doesn't fit inside her vagina. Not being fully able to fit inside her would be painful enough in the first place.

Can someone throw light here, as to what is the "idea size", which is big but also not too big? Some people aim for 12'', can't believe those idiots.

The right penis size is the one that:
  • Best fits the woman's individual vagina for maximum pleasure for her during sex;
  • Best grants pleasure to it's owner during sex with the woman he is having sex with;
  • Is most visually appealing to the woman in question;
  • Is most able to placate the masculine insecurities of it's owner.

No two women have the same size vagina. Some are naturally shallow, some are naturally deep. Even if the average is 4.whatever inches deep, the vagina is designed to stretch (for sex and birth) and a woman with a 4 inch deep vagina can be gotten to accommodate 7+ inches of erect penis, if you take the time to stretch her out gently at first. Usually the more relaxed and aroused she is sexually, the more she can accommodate.

You guys who have enough to hit her G spot, that's really all you need to have. The G spot is usually 1-2 inches inside her vagina. So at that point, you have enough and it's what you do with it.

You guys who, erect, are still too short to touch that? Start using your fingers, lips and tongue more. Many women are forgiving of a small penis if you're willing to compensate by giving her equal pleasure in other ways. It's just that most guys don't, so she's not usually initially happy with a small penis because she thinks that's all she has hope for of pleasure during sex.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-13-2016

(03-13-2016, 02:16 AM)kenpachi Wrote: Fair point about it taking away from the goals of the other programs. I understand that.

I still think a dedicated 5g or 6g sub for penis enlargement would be great.

I read back about the issue and why it got discontinued - Shannon felt it would impact negatively on the credibility of his subs in the public image if he offered it as it would be too far outside of the realities of most of the general public who would then put the subs in the "woo woo" category.

There was talk of a dedicated adult shop being set up for it but it didn't happen and I am guessing it's not high on Shannon's priority list.

As you know, there are a lot of men who would use this program in a heartbeat. For myself, and I imagine most of the others, the goal would be just to grow into an average / slightly bigger penis size. It is the only insecurity I have holding me back in life at this point, and it is a crippling one. You would change a lot of men's lives for the better if you were able to do this for them.

I think a lot of guys born with average/bigger penises don't fully grasp the negatives that come with being undersized and what a life changer it would be for guys born at a disadvantage to be able to even the playing field.

Just putting it out there - don't ask and don't get, right? Smile

The adult shop is dependent on Andrew, and Andrew's state of health is not great at the current time.

Given the amount of demand for this, I will reconsider it at some time in the future.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-13-2016

(03-13-2016, 03:44 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: Would be cool if we can get subliminals that don't require 8hours-16hours of usage daily to be effective but 3hours - 6hours max for the 5.5G.

That's one of the goals of 6G, but 5G isn't likely powerful enough to do that.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-13-2016

(03-13-2016, 04:43 AM)bogdy Wrote: Shannon might you consider making a bodybuilding subliminal likereach and mantain your ideal fitness level or better reach and mantain your,ideal muscle mass and body fat percentage, or easy 8 % body fat 5g type b c d, for those Who arent obese or Fat but want a sculpted body.

Something like that is bubbling in the back of my mind. Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-13-2016

(03-13-2016, 05:02 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: Here's what I hope Shannon creates in the upcoming months :
- BIATBWS + AOS 5.5g in one sub
- TLAM 5.5G
- Good looks subliminal ( designed to create gorgeous looks in the user along with perfect teeth & skin ) 5.5g
- AM7, WM3, SM4

The upcoming what, 36 months?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-13-2016

(03-13-2016, 05:49 AM)bogdy Wrote: Oh and Shannon 2 more questions does your subliminal include any module for wearing a seat belt because i have the need to wear it despite i hate wearing it! And secound it îs safe to convert flac to alac?

No subliminal I have ever created includes a module specifically aimed at getting a person to wear a seatbelt. That seems too much like a common sense thing to do to me for it to be something I would include. Smile

I don't ever recommend that you adjust, change or tamper with any program I create. That said, if you do convert it from one format to another, it must be that no alteration of the audio is performed during the transition (no filtration, etc.). ALAC is a lossless format, so it should be OK. Just make sure it's not filtered, altered, etc. in between.

It will not match calculated checksums afterward, of course.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-13-2016

(03-13-2016, 05:52 AM)bogdy Wrote: Oh and btw i love your subliminals and e2 is outstanding! Best investment ever!
Good job mate

Thank you, I'm pleased that it has been as well received and as effective as it has been for the amount of work, research, development and nitpicking that has gone into it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-13-2016

(03-13-2016, 06:03 AM)kenpachi Wrote:
(03-13-2016, 03:16 AM)Superman Wrote: Or you could run AM/ASC/ERPHA until your size is no longer an insecurity

I was waiting for someone to say this, so thank you.

And you might be right. I am nearing the end of AM6 Stage 6 and it hasn't sorted out the insecurity, if anything my need to do something about it has intensified, like me doing this post whereas before I would have stayed silent. I have EPHRA 2 purchased and ready to go after this run has finished, maybe that will sort it. I don't know.

But at the end of the day - why run the subs to accept the fact our penises are smaller and live with it, when we could run a penis enlargement sub, get a satisfactory size and then those negative beliefs are no longer an issue?

I know that the go-to response around here will be "Penis size doesn't matter, as long as you believe it doesn't matter", but that is counter to my real world experience with women. I think it's been said before here by people like Dzeemo, that a lot of the transcendent alpha stuff looks good in theory, but in real life it just isn't the case.

Or it limits you to attract the 1% of transcendent alpha women, which is why a lot of AM6 users report becoming loners and losing friends. Why bother being at the top when there's nobody around when you get there? I want sex with the 99% of other women, superficiality be damned. I don't want to be in relationships with these women, I want to have some fun with them. For a while at least.

I would love to listen to EPHRA 2 for 6 months, go out and the insecurity about penis size has gone and women are crazily attracted to me, and as there is no penis enlargement sub, that's what I will be doing. But a PE sub would just fix the issue entirely.

There are hardly 1% trascendent alpha women out there. That would be WAY overestimated. Transcendent alpha females are as rare or rarer than TA males. And TA males are more along the lines of 1 in 10,000 or less.

That said, it doesn't limit you. It raises your values and your standards. But if that limits you, you're doing something wrong. You can't expect to find high value females where you were looking for females before you raised your value, because you were looking for females there because they fell within your value range at that time before you raised it! You have to look elsewhere.

And as for becoming loners, that's a choice, and that choice happens to make a lot of men happy. I choose to live alone whether or not I have one or more girlfriends, and I love living alone. I also choose to socialize. The program is making you stronger and more self sufficient. If you choose to socialize less after it does it's thing, that's YOUR CHOICE. For me, it's been a lot more socialization, even though I live alone now, whereas before AM, I could not have lived alone.

Losing friends happens when you outgrow them. And new friends eventually take their place. You can't ask me for something to transform you and then complain that it transformed you. It's one or the other.

And if you want sex with "the 99% of other women, superficiality be damned", as an alpha, WHAT'S STOPPING YOU? Again... YOUR CHOICE.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-13-2016

(03-13-2016, 08:58 AM)AlphaReal Wrote: Thanks @ Mr. Anderson for the reply. I have feverishly searched all over Google, and yes almost everywhere they point out the same.

If women on avg. are only 4.75 inches deep, then is there really any point in increasing penis length at all?

I have read on forums all over, and I think the avg. size for men lies around 6 inches according to some studies

But the thing is, how the heck do these 6 and above inch guys penetrate these girls... or is everyone lying?

Or is there something wrong with those studies?

So I was hoping if anyone here can clear it up.

The vagina stretches to accommodate the penis, and the baby. That's what it's designed for.

If she's relaxed and aroused, she can accommodate quite a lot more than her depth pre-penetration. You do have to stretch her out gently at first, but even most teeny tiny petites who start off with 3-4 inches of un-streched depth can end up with 7+ erect penises comfortably and fully buried in them.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-13-2016

(03-13-2016, 02:04 PM)rayrocanaldo Wrote:
(03-13-2016, 11:36 AM)brightike Wrote:
(03-13-2016, 05:06 AM)terry44 Wrote:
(03-13-2016, 03:44 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: Would be cool if we can get subliminals that don't require 8hours-16hours of usage daily to be effective but 3hours - 6hours max for the 5.5G.

That's what I'm hoping will be one of the benefits of 6g: Less minimum hours per day and less days for permanence.

Sounds a lot like the ever pervasive "Less work for more gain" mentality. The pay out from my last two years of subs has been worth every second. Ain't no such thing as a free lunch.
I think it's considering that the better the technology the easier it gets. But I still think I'll run the new subs for minim 8hours because I'll them during my sleep

You'll have to run them for however long is possible without overloading your brain. 6G is a beast. We still have to figure out what the optimal time per day is, but I find that currently, 4-5 hours of exposure is the most I can handle without exhaustion in most cases, even with the external energy powering module.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Rocket13 - 03-13-2016

(03-13-2016, 04:43 AM)bogdy Wrote: Shannon might you consider making a bodybuilding subliminal likereach and mantain your ideal fitness level or better reach and mantain your,ideal muscle mass and body fat percentage, or easy 8 % body fat 5g type b c d, for those Who arent obese or Fat but want a sculpted body.
This would be perfect for me. I got all of these annoying fat deposits even though i lost alot of weight