Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-07-2016

(11-06-2016, 09:57 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 09:43 PM)2Cozy Wrote: Was it the first date? I don’t think anything’s wrong with making a move on a girl, but you just have to gauge where she’s at, it’s kind of like your leading her through it, like reading someone a story. You just always have to watch where she’s at, if you do too much you give away too much power and she’ll get scared, if you do to little she might feel like she’s wasting her time. Not too hot, not too cold, it just has to be smooth. Don’t see her as a hot girl, just see her a person you’re getting to know, and be the best you. And relax. After a while you can do it like clockwork.

Yeah it was the first date.

And now, this is where it gets confusing and actually gives me a headache every time I try to figure this shit out. But I thought I was supposed to be able to be masculine, "impose my will", set the frame, bring the girl into my reality, and all that shit, but then there's the other aspect of "go at her pace", check in with her, make sure she's ok, etc.

So which is it? I don't get it and it drives me insane (literally. I'm probably more likely to get admitted to a mental hospital than i am to get laid at this point, only slightly joking).

I don't understand how it all works. If I didn't know better, i'd say sleeping with a girl is more an exercise of me getting her to do what she wants, than me doing what i want. Undecided

Ok, like Chaos, I wasn't aware you were getting that much interest. Now that's squared away, like you said, let's focus on the next step.

Dating chicks and banging chicks (ONS/FWB/purely sexual) are two completely different pathways to sex. With dates, the purpose is usually to see if you are romantically compatible. The woman is not likely on the date, first and foremost, for sex. If you're looking for someone to call your girlfriend, then by all means, take this path with the awareness that sex likely won't come into the equation for some weeks - until the woman is sure your relationship is "going somewhere" or has potential for the long term.

Hooking up - different story. Meeting women (on the street, online/using an app like Tinder, bars/clubs) who are looking for just sex requires a quick chemistry-compatibility check, and quick escalation. Getting to a private place is paramount, and then from there it's about escalation. So if you say, "You wanna head back to my place?" and she says, "Yes, let's go." it's on. Once you get there, give her the tour that includes your bedroom, and position yourself to kiss her within a relatively short period of time. Some dudes literally just walk into their bedroom and hop into bed and she what she does, lol. Anyway, once you're making out, it should be smooth sailing from that to bra-and-panties on the floor, whether you're in bed, on the couch, or the kitchen table.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 11-07-2016

(11-06-2016, 09:57 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I don't understand how it all works. If I didn't know better, i'd say sleeping with a girl is more an exercise of me getting her to do what she wants, than me doing what i want. Undecided

The story women want is "it just happened" - it's very hard to give strict rules like when she does x you do y because everyone is different but that's the general frame under which women justify sex with a new guy. "We went on a date, he was cool, we went back to his place JUST to watch tv/eat/get a drink/etc, the chemistry was great and it just sort of happened"

If I were to give you a "rule" it would be this - have fun on the date and don't escalate beyond quick pecks until she's back at your place. I know it's "reality tv" but this is probably the best example on camera:



@6:15

He took the date slow, went in for a quick kiss, pulled back, pretended like it was the end of their date and he would call her, walked back to the room to say goodbye, then started escalating.

If most PUA coaches saw him they would be screaming "BETA CHODE!, SHOW INTENT, NEG HER, DISQUALIFY HER, ESCALATE ESCALATE ESCALATE!!!" Most guys would be better off throwing out 90% of PUA material - especially if they're using subliminals or mones.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-07-2016

@sarge

It's not going to take "some weeks" to get to sex if you do it the way I said. 2-3 weeks tops. Plus I don't think attractive girls will be on tinder DTF. I've seen the girls on tinder, they're pathetic.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016

Since when did my thread become the WWF Dating Channel?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-07-2016

(11-07-2016, 05:40 AM)Shannon Wrote: Since when did my thread become the WWF Dating Channel?

That's what happens when you're on hiatus for too long.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Have at ye - 11-07-2016

The DMSIs without clearing modules do seem to have a tendency to make people restless. Big Grin


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016

(11-07-2016, 05:50 AM)2Cozy Wrote:
(11-07-2016, 05:40 AM)Shannon Wrote: Since when did my thread become the WWF Dating Channel?

That's what happens when you're on hiatus for too long.

I have been having a hard time getting enough sleep lately. Something is draining my energy at an alarming rate. I'm averaging 4-6 hours awake per day. It's hard to be productive when you're expecting 12+ and you just suddenly drop from exhaustion after 4 or 6.

I slept from 7:30 PM last night to 7:30 am, for example. It's 9:30 and I'm already feeling tired again.

So it's not so much trying to disappear as trying to figure out what's going on and get enough sleep.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-07-2016

(11-07-2016, 06:30 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-07-2016, 05:50 AM)2Cozy Wrote:
(11-07-2016, 05:40 AM)Shannon Wrote: Since when did my thread become the WWF Dating Channel?

That's what happens when you're on hiatus for too long.

I have been having a hard time getting enough sleep lately. Something is draining my energy at an alarming rate. I'm averaging 4-6 hours awake per day. It's hard to be productive when you're expecting 12+ and you just suddenly drop from exhaustion after 4 or 6.

I slept from 7:30 PM last night to 7:30 am, for example. It's 9:30 and I'm already feeling tired again.

So it's not so much trying to disappear as trying to figure out what's going on and get enough sleep.

It's probably MIR.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 11-07-2016

(11-07-2016, 06:30 AM)Shannon Wrote: I'd like to cause it to trigger them not just sexually, but in all the ways that person needs to respond by initiating and having sex with the user. I think this is a big issue right now - it's lopsided. Too much sexual and not enough of whatever else is needed and desired.

Big Grin I'm feeling good about this, trigger all forms of (attraction?) whatever, that will lead to sex Cool


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016

(11-07-2016, 07:43 AM)dweller94 Wrote:
(11-07-2016, 06:30 AM)Shannon Wrote: I'd like to cause it to trigger them not just sexually, but in all the ways that person needs to respond by initiating and having sex with the user. I think this is a big issue right now - it's lopsided. Too much sexual and not enough of whatever else is needed and desired.

Big Grin I'm feeling good about this, trigger all forms of (attraction?) whatever, that will lead to sex Cool

If I can figure out how to word it... the grammar is ridiculous.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016

So I found a statement in the AOSI tuning section that had some of what was necessary, but not all of it, and I added it. Looking good. It actually uses polymorphic scripting to determine what each person needs to experience to move forward, this should be good.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 11-07-2016

A couple things Shannon. First off, congrats on your recent epiphany concerning sexual safeness. I had someone explain something similar to me except they used the analogy of an airplane pilot. Basically, if you got on an airplane and looked into the cockpit and saw two blind pilots you would feel unsafe. On the other hand, if you saw two pilots talking the pilot lingo and moving their hands and body with confidence, you would feel safe. That safeness motivates you to get on that plane and relax.

Number two, have you considered perhaps interviewing/questioning any females you are close to and pick their brains on instances where they approached a male and see if you can gather more info? I'm sure some of the guys around here could perhaps do the same. If you've done this already, then disregard this paragraph.

Number 3, for those of us who purchased DMSI can we request one of the older versions talking specifically about V1)?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - mat422 - 11-07-2016

Hey Shannon, I asked you this in my journal but I figure I might catch you here. It's been a while since I've run AM and I'm thinking it would do me some good. I only have 5.0 at the moment, haven't been able to buy 6 yet. Having said that I'm taking a break from E2. What's your opinion on 5.0? I can't remember where you stood on it because 5.0 was supposed to be the last one. Anyway it was either that or ASC. I'm leaning more towards ASC to see if maybe it can help me land a better job and then from there buy AM6. But I wanted to know your opinion. Especially since I've grown so accustomed to the 5G tech.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016

(11-07-2016, 08:36 AM)K-Train Wrote: A couple things Shannon. First off, congrats on your recent epiphany concerning sexual safeness. I had someone explain something similar to me except they used the analogy of an airplane pilot. Basically, if you got on an airplane and looked into the cockpit and saw two blind pilots you would feel unsafe. On the other hand, if you saw two pilots talking the pilot lingo and moving their hands and body with confidence, you would feel safe. That safeness motivates you to get on that plane and relax.

Number two, have you considered perhaps interviewing/questioning any females you are close to and pick their brains on instances where they approached a male and see if you can gather more info? I'm sure some of the guys around here could perhaps do the same. If you've done this already, then disregard this paragraph.

Number 3, for those of us who purchased DMSI can we request one of the older versions talking specifically about V1)?

I don't mind you guys having access to V1, if Ben is willing to link it up as an add on to the current 2.5. I would actually like to see how you think it compares to 2.4/2.5.