Post Reply 
DMSI 3.1 - no results yet?
10-02-2017, 11:14 AM
Post: #21
RE: DMSI 3.1 - no results yet?
(10-02-2017 10:24 AM)RTBoss Wrote:  
(10-02-2017 12:06 AM)CatMan Wrote:  
(10-01-2017 06:48 PM)RTBoss Wrote:  Furthermore, more loops can theoretically create a "backlog" of processing your brain would have to catch up on. If there's too much data "in queue" to process, you'll find yourself using up all your energy processing and never executing. Going back to 2 loops, if you have a backlog, would allow you to free up processing power to execute the script. This may also be why there is a "bloom," after stopping a subliminal. Your mind shifts completely from "processing mode" to "execution mode."

The backlog theory is EXACTLY what I've often thought of. On the same page as me, brother.

It's why I scaled back to 2 loops. And I feel good here, seems to be the best compromise for me. I had patience, and awaited either a breakthrough, or a new version, whichever came first.

Didn't you see "glimmers of hope" when you ran 2.5, Catman? That was a no H&C version. I seriously think, if you saw some benefit there, you should try 21 days of 3.1-B.

Hmm, I can't recall. I'd have to go back to my old V2.5 offline journal to see.

I did an experiment of B for Shannon on this one, V3.1, much earlier on.

It surprisingly felt the same as A I think. I've heard the stories of it, so that was eye raising to me. That likely means not too much of it was being executed. At least on A the H&C should be to try to move things forward.

I feel A should give me the chance to get H&C, so until I start seeing more blatant signs of girls responding to it, I think A may be my best bet. I'll leave B to the pros for now, lol!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-02-2017, 11:36 AM
Post: #22
RE: DMSI 3.1 - no results yet?
(10-02-2017 11:14 AM)CatMan Wrote:  
(10-02-2017 10:24 AM)RTBoss Wrote:  
(10-02-2017 12:06 AM)CatMan Wrote:  
(10-01-2017 06:48 PM)RTBoss Wrote:  Furthermore, more loops can theoretically create a "backlog" of processing your brain would have to catch up on. If there's too much data "in queue" to process, you'll find yourself using up all your energy processing and never executing. Going back to 2 loops, if you have a backlog, would allow you to free up processing power to execute the script. This may also be why there is a "bloom," after stopping a subliminal. Your mind shifts completely from "processing mode" to "execution mode."

The backlog theory is EXACTLY what I've often thought of. On the same page as me, brother.

It's why I scaled back to 2 loops. And I feel good here, seems to be the best compromise for me. I had patience, and awaited either a breakthrough, or a new version, whichever came first.

Didn't you see "glimmers of hope" when you ran 2.5, Catman? That was a no H&C version. I seriously think, if you saw some benefit there, you should try 21 days of 3.1-B.

Hmm, I can't recall. I'd have to go back to my old V2.5 offline journal to see.

I did an experiment of B for Shannon on this one, V3.1, much earlier on.

It surprisingly felt the same as A I think. I've heard the stories of it, so that was eye raising to me. That likely means not too much of it was being executed. At least on A the H&C should be to try to move things forward.

I feel A should give me the chance to get H&C, so until I start seeing more blatant signs of girls responding to it, I think A may be my best bet. I'll leave B to the pros for now, lol!

You barely ran B for a week, IIRC?

You need to get this H&C thing off your mind. Even Shannon said, after running B, that H&C still happens - just by brute force. I concur. Duke would cocur (pipe up Duke, if you're around!). Ben, what'd you think? Anyway, I'm going to throw out the resistance and fear card, here. I think your subc is afraid B might work, so you're just avoiding it.

Anyway, do something different...unless you feel like you're legit making headway, day-in-and-out? Otherwise, you're just spinning your wheels.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-02-2017, 12:49 PM (This post was last modified: 10-02-2017 12:51 PM by CatMan.)
Post: #23
RE: DMSI 3.1 - no results yet?
(10-02-2017 11:36 AM)RTBoss Wrote:  
(10-02-2017 11:14 AM)CatMan Wrote:  
(10-02-2017 10:24 AM)RTBoss Wrote:  
(10-02-2017 12:06 AM)CatMan Wrote:  
(10-01-2017 06:48 PM)RTBoss Wrote:  Furthermore, more loops can theoretically create a "backlog" of processing your brain would have to catch up on. If there's too much data "in queue" to process, you'll find yourself using up all your energy processing and never executing. Going back to 2 loops, if you have a backlog, would allow you to free up processing power to execute the script. This may also be why there is a "bloom," after stopping a subliminal. Your mind shifts completely from "processing mode" to "execution mode."

The backlog theory is EXACTLY what I've often thought of. On the same page as me, brother.

It's why I scaled back to 2 loops. And I feel good here, seems to be the best compromise for me. I had patience, and awaited either a breakthrough, or a new version, whichever came first.

Didn't you see "glimmers of hope" when you ran 2.5, Catman? That was a no H&C version. I seriously think, if you saw some benefit there, you should try 21 days of 3.1-B.

Hmm, I can't recall. I'd have to go back to my old V2.5 offline journal to see.

I did an experiment of B for Shannon on this one, V3.1, much earlier on.

It surprisingly felt the same as A I think. I've heard the stories of it, so that was eye raising to me. That likely means not too much of it was being executed. At least on A the H&C should be to try to move things forward.

I feel A should give me the chance to get H&C, so until I start seeing more blatant signs of girls responding to it, I think A may be my best bet. I'll leave B to the pros for now, lol!

You barely ran B for a week, IIRC?

You need to get this H&C thing off your mind. Even Shannon said, after running B, that H&C still happens - just by brute force. I concur. Duke would cocur (pipe up Duke, if you're around!). Ben, what'd you think? Anyway, I'm going to throw out the resistance and fear card, here. I think your subc is afraid B might work, so you're just avoiding it.

Anyway, do something different...unless you feel like you're legit making headway, day-in-and-out? Otherwise, you're just spinning your wheels.

I'm using the version designed to actively go after the issues that cause resistance as a focus. So my mind fears the program will work...so it's using the version best able to handle the resistance issues to MAKE it work? I don't follow that. I just know I have a lot of crap in my mind to deal with, A LOT, so A is what I want to focus on. Others like B? Great. Bet they have a lot less crap in their mind to combat. I wish I did as well but it's clear to me I may have a lot more than I even thought to deal with judging by several of my dreams.

I'm struggling to see solid results with girls on A, so switching to B makes no sense to me at this point. At least the H&C can work on me to pave the way, A is the way forward for me it seems. A person can get the same external results on A that a person can on B. I don't see any downside to me to stick with A until I see true execution. That was my original plan anyway, sticking with A and getting rid of enough garbage from my past to get serious results on it for at least 6 full months. THEN I'd consider switching to B. I have too much crap in my mind from all the years of awfulness with girls, I want to keep purging it, otherwise I won't move forward. Better than wasting my time resisting/stonewalling B, which is probably what happened and why I felt nothing really on it. Resisting constantly has been enough of an aggravation on A already...

I know guys like B and that's awesome. Rock on to those that can get results they're happy with on it. It's clear I either need A or an upgraded program version which will happen in time. I noticed no difference in B as I said, so I likely wasn't executing much of it if at all.

I think I could very slowly be seeing some forward momentum. It's very hard to tell often. I do sometimes get dreams that are relevant to the script. Some stuff when out or with people, at times I wonder afterwards if it was something worth noting etc.

I don't want to try to be hasty and switch for no reason. The whole external thing is off in the distance for me for the time being, I'm fine with that, I accept that. I'm happy staying with A until V3.2. As I continue getting more time in, and better versions come along, sticking with A should remove enough crap that I can get this thing functioning better. I hope! Smile
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-02-2017, 01:11 PM (This post was last modified: 10-02-2017 01:14 PM by RTBoss.)
Post: #24
RE: DMSI 3.1 - no results yet?
(10-02-2017 12:49 PM)CatMan Wrote:  
(10-02-2017 11:36 AM)RTBoss Wrote:  
(10-02-2017 11:14 AM)CatMan Wrote:  
(10-02-2017 10:24 AM)RTBoss Wrote:  
(10-02-2017 12:06 AM)CatMan Wrote:  The backlog theory is EXACTLY what I've often thought of. On the same page as me, brother.

It's why I scaled back to 2 loops. And I feel good here, seems to be the best compromise for me. I had patience, and awaited either a breakthrough, or a new version, whichever came first.

Didn't you see "glimmers of hope" when you ran 2.5, Catman? That was a no H&C version. I seriously think, if you saw some benefit there, you should try 21 days of 3.1-B.

Hmm, I can't recall. I'd have to go back to my old V2.5 offline journal to see.

I did an experiment of B for Shannon on this one, V3.1, much earlier on.

It surprisingly felt the same as A I think. I've heard the stories of it, so that was eye raising to me. That likely means not too much of it was being executed. At least on A the H&C should be to try to move things forward.

I feel A should give me the chance to get H&C, so until I start seeing more blatant signs of girls responding to it, I think A may be my best bet. I'll leave B to the pros for now, lol!

You barely ran B for a week, IIRC?

You need to get this H&C thing off your mind. Even Shannon said, after running B, that H&C still happens - just by brute force. I concur. Duke would cocur (pipe up Duke, if you're around!). Ben, what'd you think? Anyway, I'm going to throw out the resistance and fear card, here. I think your subc is afraid B might work, so you're just avoiding it.

Anyway, do something different...unless you feel like you're legit making headway, day-in-and-out? Otherwise, you're just spinning your wheels.

I'm using the version designed to actively go after the issues that cause resistance as a focus. So my mind fears the program will work...so it's using the version best able to handle the resistance issues to MAKE it work? I don't follow that. I just know I have a lot of crap in my mind to deal with, A LOT, so A is what I want to focus on. Others like B? Great. Bet they have a lot less crap in their mind to combat. I wish I did as well but it's clear to me I may have a lot more than I even thought to deal with judging by several of my dreams.

I'm struggling to see solid results with girls on A, so switching to B makes no sense to me at this point. At least the H&C can work on me to pave the way, A is the way forward for me it seems. A person can get the same external results on A that a person can on B. I don't see any downside to me to stick with A until I see true execution. That was my original plan anyway, sticking with A and getting rid of enough garbage from my past to get serious results on it for at least 6 full months. THEN I'd consider switching to B. I have too much crap in my mind from all the years of awfulness with girls, I want to keep purging it, otherwise I won't move forward. Better than wasting my time resisting/stonewalling B, which is probably what happened and why I felt nothing really on it. Resisting constantly has been enough of an aggravation on A already...

I know guys like B and that's awesome. Rock on to those that can get results they're happy with on it. It's clear I either need A or an upgraded program version which will happen in time. I noticed no difference in B as I said, so I likely wasn't executing much of it if at all.

I think I could very slowly be seeing some forward momentum. It's very hard to tell often. I do sometimes get dreams that are relevant to the script. Some stuff when out or with people, at times I wonder afterwards if it was something worth noting etc.

I don't want to try to be hasty and switch for no reason. The whole external thing is off in the distance for me for the time being, I'm fine with that, I accept that. I'm happy staying with A until V3.2. As I continue getting more time in, and better versions come along, sticking with A should remove enough crap that I can get this thing functioning better. I hope! Smile

You always have an excuse. Good luck to you. Just stick with what doesn't work, and don't try anything else. Whatever, dude. You've been on A for fuckin' ever. Try something else. It's your life, your decision, but I don't have much respect for your lack of results when you don't do much to change it up.

EDIT:
And by the way, please take my attitude with a grain of salt. While I still feel this way - I'm sure I could word it nicer - I've had a bad day of sorts, and I'm blowing off steam on the forum. So anyway, I'm being a bit of a dick. But I still wanna say what I said, lol.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes RTBoss's post:
Dr. Strangelove
10-02-2017, 02:50 PM
Post: #25
RE: DMSI 3.1 - no results yet?
Holy shit man...wow.

I'm happy with A.

I have a lot of issues it handles in a direct fashion.

It's my path forward, I know that now. Others don't have my issues and can do great with B, I'm happy for them.

Unfortunate I don't get "respect" because of that.

Yeah...I can see that. Hope things improve for you soon, bro.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-02-2017, 05:57 PM
Post: #26
RE: DMSI 3.1 - no results yet?
@catman: did you ever do WM? just curious.

INTJ - Assertive
http://www.16personalities.com/profiles/57d38267146d9
https://www.16personalities.com/intj-rel...ips-dating
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-02-2017, 07:40 PM (This post was last modified: 10-02-2017 07:50 PM by RTBoss.)
Post: #27
RE: DMSI 3.1 - no results yet?
I love how you doubled down. You're so stubborn, you just dig your heels in so you can be "right." Yes, it's difficult to respect that. As for your "wins" you actually attribute to DMSI 3.1 - A, I guess I'm having trouble recalling all this progress you've had with it? Is it the fapping issue, ED, or other sexual issues? Or is there more we haven't heard about?

My day has improved considerably, thanks.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-02-2017, 07:44 PM (This post was last modified: 10-02-2017 07:45 PM by RTBoss.)
Post: #28
RE: DMSI 3.1 - no results yet?
deleted
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-03-2017, 01:48 AM
Post: #29
RE: DMSI 3.1 - no results yet?
I'm not sure it's helping to talk down to Catman and tell him you aren't able to respect him and such while also trying to give advice. I'm sure you can say it without that other stuff.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-03-2017, 05:33 AM
Post: #30
RE: DMSI 3.1 - no results yet?
(10-03-2017 01:48 AM)Benjamin Wrote:  I'm not sure it's helping to talk down to Catman and tell him you aren't able to respect him and such while also trying to give advice. I'm sure you can say it without that other stuff.

There was no flaming, and it was an honest opinion. Please don't overstep yourself - you've done that a lot lately. You're not my dad, Ben, you're a moderator. No rules were broken.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes RTBoss's post:
Kol
10-03-2017, 02:09 PM (This post was last modified: 10-03-2017 02:15 PM by Benjamin.)
Post: #31
RE: DMSI 3.1 - no results yet?
Are you serious? Yes actually your posts were close enough to flaming, you didnt have to continue so youre getting a warning on your account. Even if you dot like it im gonna do my job. Though it could have ended at my simple comment.

I in no way had a go at you, yet thats exactly what you do when my post was in no way like that. Youre the one overstepping here.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  DMSI Anti-Sniper causing room mate to be angry? awesomeDMSI 9 724 Yesterday 06:46 PM
Last Post: RisingSon
  Seduced on DMSI RTBoss 34 1,710 10-09-2017 01:30 PM
Last Post: Illumi
  Solid AM6 and Magnets fundations before going to DMSI? Voytek 4 227 10-07-2017 11:38 PM
Last Post: Benjamin
  DMSI: Hybrid subliminal benefits? Jingo786 2 231 10-06-2017 04:12 PM
Last Post: dweller94
  DMSI should I buy it? Zyv 9 522 10-05-2017 02:28 PM
Last Post: Benjamin
  Another thread on SM v DMSI :) thor2014 24 1,326 09-21-2017 09:41 PM
Last Post: thor2014

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Return to TopReturn to Content