Post Reply 
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
02-19-2017, 07:55 AM
Post: #2141
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
@Jason Capitol: My guess regarding the girls: Both of them basically threw themselves at you, making it very clear they want you. It very much sounds like you failed to act on this, which in a girls mind is the equivalent of you rejecting them - which is why they go cold on you. If a girl gives clear signals, act on it (you are the man here, men act) - if you don't they leave.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes hsindermann's post:
FREAK4LIFE
02-19-2017, 08:50 AM
Post: #2142
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
Shannon,

I am glad to hear about the additional features going into MSI v3.1, but I have a concern. It seems MSI have gone very far in its capability and for some users produced quite amazing results, but for many (more than half I think) it has been mostly resistance, and has been so for many months now.

Would it make sense to concentrate on anti-resistance tech to ensure more users can get the results sooner? The additional features are cool but while many including me are not executing (I assume to mean no euphoria experienced, which makes for a majority of MSI users) and those executing it already getting great results, perhaps it's reasonable to focus mostly (if not only) on making MSI easier for users to accept, increasing the number of users getting results.

Thus far, going by journals it seems that the ratio of result to no result has actually been lower than the 4G version, and 4G and 5G versions of many subliminals. ASC 5G worked for me, for example, within a day. Meanwhile, many are still patiently letting MSI's healing do its work but it's been 8 months since 1.0 came out, and the goal still seems unachievable for too many.

Thanks.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like Lowe's post:
K-Train, hsindermann, gdogg9999, maxx55, swisston
02-19-2017, 08:53 AM
Post: #2143
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
I agree with hsindermann 100%. With the way they were acting all you needed to do was simply say yes.

Quote:Another question, I have had two girls not specifically but indirectly offered themselves to me in some secretive manner.
One girl when I was teasing her with another guy, like she should really go for this X guy, and she gets furious to me and tells me seductively, she is willing to do it with me, but I did not reply or did not do anything. Does it has anything to do with the fact that at that time I was on 2.5 version or 2.4? Also, on 2.5, this same girl grabs my hand while we were sitting next to each other in a car and holds it, and later on she ignores me for no reason.

That's a bulls-eye right there my good man. Nothing indirect about that. DMSI was achieving its design goals. Is she unattractive or were you just so caught off guard you froze a bit? Either way I understand. Just trying to see where you're at. Either way, the autopilot should have kicked in and helped (in theory).

PS: Jason, is it possible you can reduce the font size of your posts in the future please? Thanks man!

Popular recent questions to Shannon:

1. What are the "sniper modules" in V3.1?

2. What is "reality bending"?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like K-Train's post:
RTBoss, eternity
02-19-2017, 09:45 AM
Post: #2144
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
Hi Shannon, 2 questions.

Firstly a couple posts back you were suggesting creative visualizations. I was doing this and similar practices with BIATBW with good results but from what I remember you should not use them with DMSI because they would fight each others's effects or something. Did something change on that front? Given that you are pretty sure you know whom you will long distance snipe will those exercise make a difference?

And secondly I'm sure it was answered somewhere already but I'm curious... What effects will sniped person feel? While possibly powerful is it possible that a given person will not act on those effects because of their beliefs or obligations?

For not by numbers of men, nor by measure of body, but by valor of soul is war to be decided.
~Belisarius, the last Roman
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-19-2017, 01:32 PM
Post: #2145
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(02-19-2017 05:14 AM)maxx55 Wrote:  You're going to maximize reality bending for the 6G prototype and then put it in DMSI 3.2?

I'm looking forward to that version already Smile

I have been slowly implementing reality bending for quite some time. It is a very powerful thing, and with power of course comes responsibility, my responsibility here being that I must very carefully increase the "bend" until we all achieve the goals, but make sure it is always safe.

So I'm putting it in 3.1, and it's in 3.0 and was in 2.5 and 2.4 and 2.3. Now I understand how to bend it all the way to the breaking point, but that is not a safe thing to do. So in each version released, we will be adding a bit more and a bit more until we achieve that sweet spot where the program bends reality enough to make it achieve design goals for the majority of people t least, but while keeping it safe to use.

So 3.2 may be the final, because in 3.2 I will have the ability to bend reality as far as necessary. But I would rather err on the side of caution, and we may not get all the additions into 3.2. So there may be a 3.3 or a 3.4. The key here is always to achieve the goals in a safe way. I will never compromise on safety, even if it means DMSI takes 6 more months to finish or even a year.

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like Shannon's post:
wolverine_i_am, SargeMaximus, Have at ye, eternity, hunk
02-19-2017, 01:33 PM
Post: #2146
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(02-19-2017 05:23 AM)RoaringLion Wrote:  I guess I'll hold off on buying and using MHS for now since DMSI 3.1 is planned for around the 22nd.

Of course, me being sick might change that. Rolleyes

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-19-2017, 01:35 PM
Post: #2147
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(02-19-2017 05:50 AM)eternity Wrote:  Are the euphoria tags staying in 3.1? Or is there going to be different tags to signify script acceptance?

In 3.1 I have adjusted the tags for cooperation and resistance so that they should only affect that part of you that is cooperating or resisting. But they are still present. This will hopefully incentivize those parts of you that are cooperating to cooperate further, and those parts of you that are not cooperating to cooperate further. If this does not produce the desired results, I will probably remove them from 3.2.

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Shannon's post:
eternity
02-19-2017, 01:52 PM
Post: #2148
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(02-19-2017 01:32 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(02-19-2017 05:14 AM)maxx55 Wrote:  You're going to maximize reality bending for the 6G prototype and then put it in DMSI 3.2?

I'm looking forward to that version already Smile

I have been slowly implementing reality bending for quite some time. It is a very powerful thing, and with power of course comes responsibility, my responsibility here being that I must very carefully increase the "bend" until we all achieve the goals, but make sure it is always safe.

So I'm putting it in 3.1, and it's in 3.0 and was in 2.5 and 2.4 and 2.3. Now I understand how to bend it all the way to the breaking point, but that is not a safe thing to do. So in each version released, we will be adding a bit more and a bit more until we achieve that sweet spot where the program bends reality enough to make it achieve design goals for the majority of people t least, but while keeping it safe to use.

So 3.2 may be the final, because in 3.2 I will have the ability to bend reality as far as necessary. But I would rather err on the side of caution, and we may not get all the additions into 3.2. So there may be a 3.3 or a 3.4. The key here is always to achieve the goals in a safe way. I will never compromise on safety, even if it means DMSI takes 6 more months to finish or even a year.

So going forward, when the reality bending tech is complete and fully implemented in 6G, what might the effects be? Would it be noticeable that reality bending is occurring?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-19-2017, 01:55 PM
Post: #2149
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(02-19-2017 06:28 AM)Jason Capital Wrote:  Shannon, did you implement as you said in your journal the volume calibration scripting in the latest sub, MIR, MHS or DMSI ?

Yes, that was implemented in DMSI 3.0 and exists in MHS 5.5G also.

Quote:I am curious did you also use the energy source from Sun or it was the fun part ?

I have not had a chance to look at direct energy sourcing from the sun. However, given the difference in power between what you have and what the sun has, even if that is possible it would be incredibly important to make sure you didn't source more energy than was safe, or controllable. I will put that in my notes, though.

Quote:Side question: How fast you type? What's your Typing speed?

73 wpm max, last testing.

Quote:DMSI Question. I have encountered the DMSI user in real life, and he is male and somehow I did not think of him in a long time, but since starting his run, he came on my radar, I thought of connecting and talking with him, and it was kinda surprising for me as that person I have not paid any special attention to him in my past as I am far superior in everything as I have had presumed, but somehow I found myself contacting him, and as soon as I realized I am contacting him, or whenever I found even a bit resistance in doing so, I disengaged myself from any further talk for the time being. So it was kinda new insight that this is how someone who comes into my contact in real life feels this way about me and if that's correct, I want the affected to feel okay and comfortable in doing so, and have the perfect logical base and it should make perfect sense to do so on a logical as well as emotional level. I don't know if you can see what I mean here, but can you include something in 3.1 or 3.2 that causes the affected to overcome any and all objections. I know it's already in place. But can you make it even more focused than it already is?

I'll see if I have time to do that in 3.1.

Quote:Another question, I have had two girls not specifically but indirectly offered themselves to me in some secretive manner.
One girl when I was teasing her with another guy, like she should really go for this X guy, and she gets furious to me and tells me seductively, she is willing to do it with me, but I did not reply or did not do anything. Does it has anything to do with the fact that at that time I was on 2.5 version or 2.4? Also, on 2.5, this same girl grabs my hand while we were sitting next to each other in a car and holds it, and later on she ignores me for no reason.

Yes. That was a pretty blatant hit. Apparently you either missed it, or it scared you and you ignored it. I used to do that when women would show interest.

Quote:Second girl, when I was on break from 2.4 grabs my hand in the elevator, and holds it for atleast 10 seconds and we were at least 8 to 9 people who were in my friend circle, and until elevator opens, she holds my hand, and the next thing I don't understand, is that she completely ignores me, and I am totally confused and turned on, I don't know what to do. What does it imply and how can I move forward with this kinda thing?

As others have said, she was being extremely blatant (in womanese) that she liked you and was interested by grabbing your hand and especially in front of everyone else. You have to understand that she needed some signal of returned interest and approval from you to feel like she was not just making a fool of herself in front of everybody. I'm guessing that you withdrew out of fear and gave no signal. This would be interpreted as disinterest by a woman (and with good reason). She would then very likely feel rejected and slighted or presume you were telling her she wasn't good enough for you, and this would make her go cold as a defense mechanism since you effectively made her look and feel stupid for putting herself out there in front of everybody to tell you she was interested.
Quote:This same girl, while on 2.5, looks at me with fvck me eyes, gets caught by one of my friend, and he calls her out for that, and one time she winks at me and he catches her the second time.
On 3.0.1, this same girl sits near me, asks me to move aside to let her sit with me on the bed at my friend's place. Her whole back is touching my leg, and her bxtt at points touches my feet. And at one point, she sleeps at my chest level, and quickly realizes this and moves aside. And there was some talk regarding love, and someone asked her about her love life, and she tells them that it's not moving forward right now as it is silent. And she was directing this at me as we were on silent mode at that time. This lets me know what from 2.4 and 2.5, she has now become much more receptive and open to me, but still hasn't opened that much with me. So my question is what's going on with these girls? Is it some sorta fear kicking in them or what?

I'd say what's going on with you? Because that's about as blatant and obvious concerning her interest in you and sex with you as a woman gets without being a hooker.

Quote:Also, I have been increasingly becoming more and more silent, and sometimes stuttering without any reason, it has happened in SM3, 2.4, 2.5 and 3.0.1, but it quickly fades away if I pay attention to it and become aware of it.

And I was waiting for this. You are reacting to DMSI by excuting it, but at the same time, you're afraid of what it does. Stuttering and silence is the clue to this. You have to outgrow that.

Quote:To recap, my questions are:

1. The volume calibration scripting is included or not?
2. What's your typing speed?
3. What causes the affected in DMSI to stop perusing and prevent themselves from further chasing or indulging?
4. The girl who can clearly offer in a fun manner to me, and can hold my hand in car and ignores me many times. What's going on here? (Btw, this girl used to put me down or confront me when I was teasing or using dirty language, many times in SM3 and but this has stopped for some reason while on 2.4, 2.5 or 3.0.1.)
5. The girl who can hold my hand for 10 seconds in elevator while other people are looking, who can sleep with me (lie down) for even two or three seconds, who looks at me with fvck me eyes, (btw fme has happened so many times with her), pulls off for no reason, and more importantly she does not contact me except in real life, on physical level. What's going on here?
6. What causes the stuttering to happen? I have somehow this fear that I would stutter, but mostly I don't stutter. (btw, I am the kinda guy who has had extremely clear pronunciation, loud and clear voice and who has had absolute perfect control over his speech, and it fades away quickly, and it happens only in certain situation)
7. I have had one dream while in 2.4, that some dark energy or something like ghost comes around my body, and absorbs itself in my heart, and it was so scary that I woke from my dream, and this had happened I tried to banish the negative energy or influences from my being at any level and it scared me to death.

This is almost certainly your subconscious showing you a symbolic dream that you are "allowing evil into your heart" by running DMSI. Which of course is preposterous. This sort of fear based thinking will be overcome if you continue using it.

Quote:8. Also, I have had one dream, wherein the ghost or some ET influence possessed some of the people I know, and when I am little bit scared, but I confront them without hesitation and they do not go away instantly but I am not affected by them, and that surprised me a lot. I have had some other dreams wherein this influences tried to overtake my being but I tried to kill them with extreme fierce force and absolute certainty that they can't harm me. Does this mean that energy flooding is causing or attracting some negative energy or influences in my life?

The energy flooding cannot source or use negative energy. What seems most likely to me is that you're wrestling again with deeply held limiting fear based beliefs that are trying to get you to stop using DMSI because it conflicts with those beliefs.

DMSI 3.1 has energy shielding in it which will protect you in the off chance that you have somehow attracted some negative entity.

Quote:9. Also, for some reason, I seem to indulge myself in fun or entertainment activities a lot, and it seems to affect me a lot like I am not doing anything with my life. Just watching TV shows, which makes me enjoy my life to the fullest and it frees me somehow but I can't do anything with my life. And it concerns me to certain degree. Can you shed some light here?
Thank you.

Escapism. Seeking pleasure instead of accepting personal responsibility or doing what needs to be done. Classic resistance technique to being faced with needing to take responsibility - which is in 3.0, and stronger in 3.1.

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Shannon's post:
Griffin, eternity
02-19-2017, 02:06 PM
Post: #2150
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(02-19-2017 08:50 AM)Lowe Wrote:  Shannon,

I am glad to hear about the additional features going into MSI v3.1, but I have a concern. It seems MSI have gone very far in its capability and for some users produced quite amazing results, but for many (more than half I think) it has been mostly resistance, and has been so for many months now.

Would it make sense to concentrate on anti-resistance tech to ensure more users can get the results sooner? The additional features are cool but while many including me are not executing (I assume to mean no euphoria experienced, which makes for a majority of MSI users) and those executing it already getting great results, perhaps it's reasonable to focus mostly (if not only) on making MSI easier for users to accept, increasing the number of users getting results.

Firstly, consider that resistance means that the program is working. It's touching on something or some things that frighten you to do at some level. The progression we can expect from considering this with logic is that we will start off with maximum resistance and then with each iteration and increase in power, more and more will begin getting the results. Is this not what we have been observing? On that point, it will simply require patience. Crafting the different aspects of this program is no simple task, and they must be made safe. They are also all interconnected. So we can't just take a step straight to finished, even though at this point I think I know how to do that, because doing so would not be safe unless and until we have all the interwoven component parts at the same level.

There is a significant increase in the power of the ASS/ART modules in 3.1, I just have not been talking about it.

Beast 10 is sitting on my hard drive, waiting for me to be well enough to test it. It is the result of me working long and hard to do two things: achieve unlimited reality bending, and unlimited motivational ability. If it performs as the models suggest, then we are only a few short steps away from that being a reality. At which point the only thing I have to do is carefully calibrate and optimize the strength of these two components and we may be finished trying to achieve the design goal.

Quote:Thus far, going by journals it seems that the ratio of result to no result has actually been lower than the 4G version, and 4G and 5G versions of many subliminals. ASC 5G worked for me, for example, within a day. Meanwhile, many are still patiently letting MSI's healing do its work but it's been 8 months since 1.0 came out, and the goal still seems unachievable for too many.

Thanks.


Try MIR. Try MHS. They will work for you, even if DMSI does not. Why? Because you won;t likely try to resist them. Most people will not have anything to fear by becoming healthier or killing an infection. But as we have seen, there are a lot of fears cming up over what DMSI is trying to achieve, and those fears are why people are not yet getting the results.

It's not far off. Mark my words.

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Shannon's post:
Lowe, Have at ye, eternity, wolverine_i_am
02-19-2017, 02:09 PM
Post: #2151
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(02-19-2017 09:45 AM)Mystic Pymp Wrote:  Hi Shannon, 2 questions.

Firstly a couple posts back you were suggesting creative visualizations. I was doing this and similar practices with BIATBW with good results but from what I remember you should not use them with DMSI because they would fight each others's effects or something. Did something change on that front? Given that you are pretty sure you know whom you will long distance snipe will those exercise make a difference?

CV isn't going to be useful for the LDS. It's useful for the standard sniper. LDS is auto-targetting.

Quote:And secondly I'm sure it was answered somewhere already but I'm curious... What effects will sniped person feel? While possibly powerful is it possible that a given person will not act on those effects because of their beliefs or obligations?

I will have to report back on what they will feel when I have been a snipee. And yes, it is possible that a person will not act on being sniped, but given the nature of the LDS and SDS, it is very likely that over time, they will respond as desired.

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Shannon's post:
Alpha360
02-19-2017, 02:21 PM
Post: #2152
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(02-19-2017 01:52 PM)THolt Wrote:  
(02-19-2017 01:32 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(02-19-2017 05:14 AM)maxx55 Wrote:  You're going to maximize reality bending for the 6G prototype and then put it in DMSI 3.2?

I'm looking forward to that version already Smile

I have been slowly implementing reality bending for quite some time. It is a very powerful thing, and with power of course comes responsibility, my responsibility here being that I must very carefully increase the "bend" until we all achieve the goals, but make sure it is always safe.

So I'm putting it in 3.1, and it's in 3.0 and was in 2.5 and 2.4 and 2.3. Now I understand how to bend it all the way to the breaking point, but that is not a safe thing to do. So in each version released, we will be adding a bit more and a bit more until we achieve that sweet spot where the program bends reality enough to make it achieve design goals for the majority of people t least, but while keeping it safe to use.

So 3.2 may be the final, because in 3.2 I will have the ability to bend reality as far as necessary. But I would rather err on the side of caution, and we may not get all the additions into 3.2. So there may be a 3.3 or a 3.4. The key here is always to achieve the goals in a safe way. I will never compromise on safety, even if it means DMSI takes 6 more months to finish or even a year.

So going forward, when the reality bending tech is complete and fully implemented in 6G, what might the effects be? Would it be noticeable that reality bending is occurring?

The primary effects of reality bending are that what was once impossible or astronomically unlikely... happens. And relatively quickly. And it will seem perfectly natural, because it is - you will exist in the reality in which that was supposed to happen. We bent the reality from what it was to point at what we wanted to achieve, and because we bent it in the right direction, with the right amount of power and force, we safely achieved it.

Right now, you think it is extremely unlikely that you would walk into a movie theater and have an 18 year old girl you have never met before actually sense you, seek you out during the movie, and then successfully seduce you into having sex with her during the movie. Why? Because right now, in the reality in which you currently exist, it is not the goal. Otherwise it would be happening. But when DMSI is finished, this sort of thing can and will happen, and it will happen more than once.

I'm not saying you will experience this exact scenario, but the type of thing that is extremely unlikely or "impossible" to you now will become not only possible, but likely, and will very likely happen multiple times because of that.

Look at the results we are getting with DMSI now. Those people who are getting results are getting results that blow us away. Why? Because we are assuming a reality in which they cannot happen. They're impossible, or extremely unlikely.

But when you focus on them properly, they become very likely as long as you don't self sabotage or resist. And why would you have to self sabotage or resist if not for the fact that otherwise, you would achieve the program goal?

When I released V1, everyone was amazed. V2, nobody was amazed by what amazed you about V1 because you got used to the reality shifts caused by V1. It became normal, but before using V1, I had people laughing at me on my own forum saying that what V1 did was impossible.

And with each version we have slowly made our way forward and now we are seeing results that show us that A) these things really are possible, and B) a lot of us are downright scared to achieve those goals. And those who are afraid to achieve those goals have to resist and self sabotage to maintain the status quo of nothing because the program does work, and without that constant effort, would achieve the goals!

We can't just go from water faucet to Niagra Falls overnight though on power. It's not safe. So we ratchet it up a step at a time, because too much is not safe. This means we cannot fail, but it also requires patience as I find that sweet spot of power and safety. And in this world of instant everything patience is in seriously short supply.

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 8 users Like Shannon's post:
Have at ye, eternity, wolverine_i_am, Kol, Zane, , enoch, D.Ace
02-19-2017, 03:04 PM
Post: #2153
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(02-19-2017 02:21 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(02-19-2017 01:52 PM)THolt Wrote:  
(02-19-2017 01:32 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(02-19-2017 05:14 AM)maxx55 Wrote:  You're going to maximize reality bending for the 6G prototype and then put it in DMSI 3.2?

I'm looking forward to that version already Smile

I have been slowly implementing reality bending for quite some time. It is a very powerful thing, and with power of course comes responsibility, my responsibility here being that I must very carefully increase the "bend" until we all achieve the goals, but make sure it is always safe.

So I'm putting it in 3.1, and it's in 3.0 and was in 2.5 and 2.4 and 2.3. Now I understand how to bend it all the way to the breaking point, but that is not a safe thing to do. So in each version released, we will be adding a bit more and a bit more until we achieve that sweet spot where the program bends reality enough to make it achieve design goals for the majority of people t least, but while keeping it safe to use.

So 3.2 may be the final, because in 3.2 I will have the ability to bend reality as far as necessary. But I would rather err on the side of caution, and we may not get all the additions into 3.2. So there may be a 3.3 or a 3.4. The key here is always to achieve the goals in a safe way. I will never compromise on safety, even if it means DMSI takes 6 more months to finish or even a year.

So going forward, when the reality bending tech is complete and fully implemented in 6G, what might the effects be? Would it be noticeable that reality bending is occurring?

The primary effects of reality bending are that what was once impossible or astronomically unlikely... happens. And relatively quickly. And it will seem perfectly natural, because it is - you will exist in the reality in which that was supposed to happen. We bent the reality from what it was to point at what we wanted to achieve, and because we bent it in the right direction, with the right amount of power and force, we safely achieved it.

Right now, you think it is extremely unlikely that you would walk into a movie theater and have an 18 year old girl you have never met before actually sense you, seek you out during the movie, and then successfully seduce you into having sex with her during the movie. Why? Because right now, in the reality in which you currently exist, it is not the goal. Otherwise it would be happening. But when DMSI is finished, this sort of thing can and will happen, and it will happen more than once.

I'm not saying you will experience this exact scenario, but the type of thing that is extremely unlikely or "impossible" to you now will become not only possible, but likely, and will very likely happen multiple times because of that.

Look at the results we are getting with DMSI now. Those people who are getting results are getting results that blow us away. Why? Because we are assuming a reality in which they cannot happen. They're impossible, or extremely unlikely.

But when you focus on them properly, they become very likely as long as you don't self sabotage or resist. And why would you have to self sabotage or resist if not for the fact that otherwise, you would achieve the program goal?

When I released V1, everyone was amazed. V2, nobody was amazed by what amazed you about V1 because you got used to the reality shifts caused by V1. It became normal, but before using V1, I had people laughing at me on my own forum saying that what V1 did was impossible.

And with each version we have slowly made our way forward and now we are seeing results that show us that A) these things really are possible, and B) a lot of us are downright scared to achieve those goals. And those who are afraid to achieve those goals have to resist and self sabotage to maintain the status quo of nothing because the program does work, and without that constant effort, would achieve the goals!

We can't just go from water faucet to Niagra Falls overnight though on power. It's not safe. So we ratchet it up a step at a time, because too much is not safe. This means we cannot fail, but it also requires patience as I find that sweet spot of power and safety. And in this world of instant everything patience is in seriously short supply.

It will be interesting to see how this technology is applied to future programs such as BAMM 3.0.

Very interesting stuff
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-19-2017, 03:13 PM
Post: #2154
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(02-19-2017 02:09 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(02-19-2017 09:45 AM)Mystic Pymp Wrote:  Hi Shannon, 2 questions.

Firstly a couple posts back you were suggesting creative visualizations. I was doing this and similar practices with BIATBW with good results but from what I remember you should not use them with DMSI because they would fight each others's effects or something. Did something change on that front? Given that you are pretty sure you know whom you will long distance snipe will those exercise make a difference?

CV isn't going to be useful for the LDS. It's useful for the standard sniper. LDS is auto-targetting.

Ah, ok, I misunderstood you. I'll try this again. So basically when you see someone who is attractive to you you can enhance standard sniper with CV, is that what you meant?

For not by numbers of men, nor by measure of body, but by valor of soul is war to be decided.
~Belisarius, the last Roman
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-19-2017, 03:16 PM
Post: #2155
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
Thank you Shannon, for the thing you help me achieve.
For the stuff you provide.

just wanted to say that.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-19-2017, 03:26 PM
Post: #2156
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
This sounds very promising. It really does sound like we just have to bend our realities to be whatever we want. Sounds so simple.

I really do look forward to the day that DMSI just bends my reality and the hotties are literally jumping me for sex.

I'm also glad to hear that the ART is getting a noticeable buff compared to 3.0. Once the ART, reality bending, and motivation modules are all at the perfect levels, the users can focus on things like what tweaks to make to the sniper or manifestation modules instead of waiting to get past resistance/healing. At that point, DMSI can be quickly refined and fine-tuned.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes maxx55's post:
wolverine_i_am
02-19-2017, 03:27 PM (This post was last modified: 02-19-2017 03:49 PM by Zane.)
Post: #2157
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(02-18-2017 09:18 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(02-18-2017 05:34 PM)Zane Wrote:  Shannon I am listening to OF... I am on day 21. Why am I feeling confused.? I feel like my subconscious is confused but idk about what? What do u think is happening?

There are a number of possible reasons, and I have no way of knowing which one it is definitively. It's possible that your subconscious is confused why you would want to give up your fears because it believes they keep you safe. Or it might be confused how to deal with having given them up, or what it was trying to protect you from by being afraid if it gives them up, or how to do something without them, or any number of other things.

One more Question Shannon... I have noticed that when I start listening to OF-4G.
After 30 minutes I start feeling so hot that I had to take cold shower and had to sit under fan to cool myself and after sometime I still feel hot again I get a little bit of soaked in my own sweat? ... Is this normal? Do you know anything about it as I have heard people saying this happening on DMSI. . So what's going on?

“I'll Take a Nightmare That's Real Over a Dream That's a Lie"-Sarah
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-19-2017, 03:33 PM
Post: #2158
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
Shannon

You told me to get a picture of her and focus on her and feel her energy.
When I do this, if I want her in every way, what else should I do? Do I do affirmations, or use my emotions and try to "feel us in the situations I want us in,or use CV to see us in these situations?

Thank You again for your valuable time.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-19-2017, 03:39 PM
Post: #2159
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
I'm in bloom mode. Went to a club this weekend and a girl ended up at my table. We played rock, paper scissors, loser drinks. I made no effort, didn't try any tricks or tactics, she just came closer and closer to me until eventually she was right in my face making obvious she wanted me to kiss her, so i did and we made out afew times and i pulled her close to me while we continued playing games together, her ass against my dick. I don't know how to continue past this point since it was quite late and my wife was due home and by 4:30am she was asking where i am and threatening me to return home.

Anyway, we have been talking quite a bit since and i have kept the conversation sexual. I told her i like sexy clothes like stockings and heels, and she said she has two pairs of stockings and i can see them in person. I guess I'll have to get a hotel room soon.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes RoaringLion's post:
enoch
02-19-2017, 03:51 PM (This post was last modified: 02-19-2017 03:51 PM by maxx55.)
Post: #2160
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
Shannon, I'm sure some people will go with the conscious sniping method for 3.1 and focus on pics and videos of girls they want.

Is there going to be some kind of anti-oneitis module so the user doesn't become obsessed with the girl they are sniping?

And will there be some way for users to know whether or not they can conscious snipe using that method? I take it that, just like the other snipers, if the user is still healing/clearing then the sniper won't work. It'd be terrible for a user to be doing this method for like a month while they're still healing and end up wasting time and effort.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Alteration -- Kalmah0804's Emotional Healing & Others Journal (Sub Break/EMDR) kalmah0804 913 108,820 Today 08:24 AM
Last Post: kalmah0804
  My MLS results journal Determined 3 394 Yesterday 11:53 PM
Last Post: Determined
Music Strumming my Brain with MLS 3.0 Journal Ampersnd 140 7,276 Yesterday 07:05 PM
Last Post: Ampersnd
  Transcendent Sith Lord's Exp.Journal OF 5G (Success) DarthXedonias 108 12,909 10-17-2017 08:29 PM
Last Post: DarthXedonias
  Shannon's Journal, Volume 2 Shannon 3,308 928,805 10-17-2017 08:31 AM
Last Post: Shannon
  myth's Belated DMSI 3.1 Journal myth 63 3,852 10-15-2017 12:11 PM
Last Post: myth

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread:
RisingSon, 4 Guest(s)

Return to TopReturn to Content